I would agree with you, a much better episode than Lee Mack although his was okay in its way But I think this was much deeper, casting a chink of light on a difficult subject You do wonder about those letters & poem, did they ever get to his wife? or were they donated to the archives later on? Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 27/07/2018 19:22, Kathy Wadlow wrote: > I enjoyed the episode too, much more interesting than last week with Lee Mack. > I thought Boy George was surprisingly articulate and a deep thinker. I would love to know how the letters that were written by his poor great uncle to his newly wed wife, prior to him being hanged, came to be archived and available though. Very moving. > > Kathy > in Kent

Yes I confess I was not expecting much, but then you tend to find they are the better ones Given his past, he surprised me, he comes across as an intelligent and thoughtful person It highlighted the complex nature of life in Ireland and the many conflicts of interest that must have beset many a family Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 27/07/2018 19:01, Helen Burton wrote: > Yes Nivard. I think he had some demons which, thank goodness, he to learned > to tame. > > Interesting story though. >

I enjoyed the episode too, much more interesting than last week with Lee Mack. I thought Boy George was surprisingly articulate and a deep thinker. I would love to know how the letters that were written by his poor great uncle to his newly wed wife, prior to him being hanged, came to be archived and available though. Very moving. Kathy in Kent Sent from my iPad On 27 Jul 2018, at 19:02, Helen Burton <helbrtn@gmail.com> wrote: Yes Nivard. I think he had some demons which, thank goodness, he to learned to tame. Interesting story though. On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 18:01, Nivard Ovington <ovington.one@gmail.com> wrote: > Did anyone catch the episode ? > > Well worth watching if you haven't already > > George came across very well I thought > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) >> > > _______________________________________________ >

Yes Nivard. I think he had some demons which, thank goodness, he to learned to tame. Interesting story though. On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 18:01, Nivard Ovington <ovington.one@gmail.com> wrote: > Did anyone catch the episode ? > > Well worth watching if you haven't already > > George came across very well I thought > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > On 25/07/2018 13:00, Nivard Ovington wrote: > > > > Hi all > > > > Latest episode of WDYTYA is on tonight at 9pm > > > > Subject is Boy George aka George Alan O'DOWD > > > > Boy George Singer Boy George knows that his maternal grandmother was > > found wandering the streets of Dublin as a small child and put in a > > children's home, and also heard that one of his great uncles was hanged > > in Dublin's Mountjoy jail and is somehow connected to Kevin Barry, who > > was commemorated in an Irish rebel song. As George uncovers the grim > > details of what really happened to his grandmother and his great uncle, > > he also delights in a new sense of his family being truly part of Irish > > history > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe and Archives > https://mailinglists.rootsweb.com/listindexes/search/derbysgen > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Did anyone catch the episode ? Well worth watching if you haven't already George came across very well I thought Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 25/07/2018 13:00, Nivard Ovington wrote: > > Hi all > > Latest episode of WDYTYA is on tonight at 9pm > > Subject is Boy George aka George Alan O'DOWD > > Boy George Singer Boy George knows that his maternal grandmother was > found wandering the streets of Dublin as a small child and put in a > children's home, and also heard that one of his great uncles was hanged > in Dublin's Mountjoy jail and is somehow connected to Kevin Barry, who > was commemorated in an Irish rebel song. As George uncovers the grim > details of what really happened to his grandmother and his great uncle, > he also delights in a new sense of his family being truly part of Irish > history > >

Hi all Latest episode of WDYTYA is on tonight at 9pm Subject is Boy George aka George Alan O'DOWD Boy George Singer Boy George knows that his maternal grandmother was found wandering the streets of Dublin as a small child and put in a children's home, and also heard that one of his great uncles was hanged in Dublin's Mountjoy jail and is somehow connected to Kevin Barry, who was commemorated in an Irish rebel song. As George uncovers the grim details of what really happened to his grandmother and his great uncle, he also delights in a new sense of his family being truly part of Irish history -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

From Rootsweb We will be moving our Mailing Lists to newer and what should be better performing machines on Thursday July 26, 2018. You can expect somewhere between 4 and 8 hours of downtime. No emails will be lost, but everything will be delayed. Also, your admin tools will not be available. -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

I have a 3rd great grandfather John Coombe & Julia Hocken on 17 September 1796 in a marriage register in Perranarworthal, Cornwall, both listed as sojourner. Bill Addy New Jersey USA

Hi Nivard, You might find the article 'The early history of Bexleyheath' of interest, there is a section on sojourners living there. It is on www.Bexley.gov.uk. Can't elaborate at moment as just dashing out - in this heat! Mad. best wishes Kathy in Kent > On 23/07/2018 19:08, Nivard Ovington wrote: > Hi all > Looking for some feedback please re the term "sojourner" as found recorded on marriages in parish

I can only find one and that was in St. Ebbe's, Oxford 14 Sep 1809 William EDGINGTON, sojourner Ann KIMBER sojourner Whilst most were 'otp', there were a number who were 'lodgers' including: 07 May 1803 Henry KING of Cowley and Ann BURRIN, lodger at Oxford St. Ebbes. Checking this page in the marriage register there are 8 marriages and 4 of the individuals were described as sojourners. Until you raised this I had assumed (I know you shouldn't!) that lodger and sojourner were similar versions of residency - not full time residents in the parish, but now I'm not so sure, Sorry - none that I've found in Derbyshire, Rosemary On 23/07/2018 19:08, Nivard Ovington wrote: > > Hi all > > Looking for some feedback please re the term "sojourner" as found > recorded on marriages in parish registers

Thanks for yours Joan That is slightly more unusual yet ;-) Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 24/07/2018 09:21, Joan wrote: > I have a marriage in 1820 in Ashburton, Devon where both are described as sojourners of this parish, > > Joan

I have a marriage in 1820 in Ashburton, Devon where both are described as sojourners of this parish, Joan On 24/07/2018 08:50:44, Nivard Ovington <ovington.one@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks for yours Jane How frequently do you come across it? And in all or most parishes or just a few ? I don't mean specifically but just a gut feeling from having transcribed those PRs Just trying to get a feel for how widespread a practice it is In my experience its infrequent but there are an awful lot of parishes ;-) Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 24/07/2018 08:27, Jane Taylor via DERBYSGEN wrote: > Have transcribed a lot of parish records for Lincolnshire, for FreeReg, I have frequently come across the term sojourner usually for records pre 1837. > Regards > Jane _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe and Archives https://mailinglists.rootsweb.com/listindexes/search/derbysgen Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Thanks for yours Jane How frequently do you come across it? And in all or most parishes or just a few ? I don't mean specifically but just a gut feeling from having transcribed those PRs Just trying to get a feel for how widespread a practice it is In my experience its infrequent but there are an awful lot of parishes ;-) Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 24/07/2018 08:27, Jane Taylor via DERBYSGEN wrote: > Have transcribed a lot of parish records for Lincolnshire, for FreeReg, I have frequently come across the term sojourner usually for records pre 1837. > Regards > Jane

Have transcribed a lot of parish records for Lincolnshire, for FreeReg, I have frequently come across the term sojourner usually for records pre 1837. Regards Jane Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: ANNE Sent: 23 July 2018 22:50 To: Derbyshire genealogy Subject: [DBY]Re: Wirksworth marriages question re sojourner In Somerset I have seen OTP or NOTP - of this parish or not. In some cases banns were read in both churches and appear as a marriage record in both. Anne -----Original Message----- From: Nivard Ovington Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 2:08 PM To: derbysgen@rootsweb.com Subject: [DBY]Wirksworth marriages question re sojourner Hi all Looking for some feedback please re the term "sojourner" as found recorded on marriages in parish registers One parish its been mentioned where its been found in use is Wirksworth, which as we all know has had a considerable, nay staggering amount of work done on it ;-) Sojourner is used by some ministers to denote where one or other party is not a full time resident in the parish they are marrying in but have qualified for one set of banns by being taken as resident for three weeks minimum Banns incurred a charge in each parish so some parties would move into or say they moved into the one parish, often the brides to save one banns fee Some ministers used the term sojourner to note that short residency and show that person was not a long term resident In my experience this is far from widespread and used by the odd minister here and there and even then sparingly Most ministers appear to have just read the banns but not noted whether one party was a sojourner I wondered what others experiences have been in this regard Another way of expressing that one party wasn't a long term resident was by entering the word "resident" after the one party and nothing against the other Again I would welcome feedback on whether anyone has found that in their research and where if possible The above is in relation to any parish in any county, I am just interested to know if others have found either term and how frequent -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe and Archives https://mailinglists.rootsweb.com/listindexes/search/derbysgen Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe and Archives https://mailinglists.rootsweb.com/listindexes/search/derbysgen Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Thanks for your feedback Anne Its usually a case of OTP or of the parish of XXXX isn't it It seems some clerks/ministers made up their own way of doing things Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 23/07/2018 22:44, ANNE wrote: > In Somerset I have seen OTP or NOTP - of this parish or not.  In some > cases banns were read in both churches and appear as a marriage record > in both. > > Anne

In Somerset I have seen OTP or NOTP - of this parish or not. In some cases banns were read in both churches and appear as a marriage record in both. Anne -----Original Message----- From: Nivard Ovington Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 2:08 PM To: derbysgen@rootsweb.com Subject: [DBY]Wirksworth marriages question re sojourner Hi all Looking for some feedback please re the term "sojourner" as found recorded on marriages in parish registers One parish its been mentioned where its been found in use is Wirksworth, which as we all know has had a considerable, nay staggering amount of work done on it ;-) Sojourner is used by some ministers to denote where one or other party is not a full time resident in the parish they are marrying in but have qualified for one set of banns by being taken as resident for three weeks minimum Banns incurred a charge in each parish so some parties would move into or say they moved into the one parish, often the brides to save one banns fee Some ministers used the term sojourner to note that short residency and show that person was not a long term resident In my experience this is far from widespread and used by the odd minister here and there and even then sparingly Most ministers appear to have just read the banns but not noted whether one party was a sojourner I wondered what others experiences have been in this regard Another way of expressing that one party wasn't a long term resident was by entering the word "resident" after the one party and nothing against the other Again I would welcome feedback on whether anyone has found that in their research and where if possible The above is in relation to any parish in any county, I am just interested to know if others have found either term and how frequent -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe and Archives https://mailinglists.rootsweb.com/listindexes/search/derbysgen Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Hi all Looking for some feedback please re the term "sojourner" as found recorded on marriages in parish registers One parish its been mentioned where its been found in use is Wirksworth, which as we all know has had a considerable, nay staggering amount of work done on it ;-) Sojourner is used by some ministers to denote where one or other party is not a full time resident in the parish they are marrying in but have qualified for one set of banns by being taken as resident for three weeks minimum Banns incurred a charge in each parish so some parties would move into or say they moved into the one parish, often the brides to save one banns fee Some ministers used the term sojourner to note that short residency and show that person was not a long term resident In my experience this is far from widespread and used by the odd minister here and there and even then sparingly Most ministers appear to have just read the banns but not noted whether one party was a sojourner I wondered what others experiences have been in this regard Another way of expressing that one party wasn't a long term resident was by entering the word "resident" after the one party and nothing against the other Again I would welcome feedback on whether anyone has found that in their research and where if possible The above is in relation to any parish in any county, I am just interested to know if others have found either term and how frequent -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

Hi Lou Archives are back to 2005 at present so still some years to go but getting there gradually Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 22/07/2018 17:53, lr_mills@mauimail.com wrote: > These were all gathered from the mailing list archives at Rootsweb. The archives don't appear to be complete for all e-mail yet, but all of the "derbysgen" content DOES appear to be complete. > > Lou

These were all gathered from the mailing list archives at Rootsweb. The archives don't appear to be complete for all e-mail yet, but all of the "derbysgen" content DOES appear to be complete. Lou ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hilary Thomas" <organic22@bigpond.com> To: "lr mills" <lr_mills@mauimail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:40:34 PM Subject: RE: [DBY]Boylestone parish burials Hi Lou Mills, Pardon the home intrusion. I was a user of Mike Spencer's Yesterday's Journey - I have a lot of Derbyshire Ancestry, and my mother's family were wheelwrights in Boylestone. Started the Rose and Crown Pub there. Now I live in Australia. At one time returning to England I met Mike, quite by fluke, in the Derby Studies Library. I really appreciated all of the work that he did. Are you collecting these records of Mikes from the Rootsweb Archives? Or can you help me by directing me to where they used to be held. I have a vague recollection of lists of them, either in the Archive - this is apart from his web page, which came a bit later, I think. What happened to his web page? Mike obtained in his journeys a settlement certificate for me of one of my Ancestors - it was almost illegible and he was very helpful helping me to read it. With Regards Hilary Thomas

My pleasure! you have to replace AROBASE by the sign and "stick" the surname on one side, and the klm on the other ;) it's a computer trick to avoid phising and pirating ;) On 20 July 2018 at 20:06, Peter Patilla via DERBYSGEN < derbysgen@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Marie > Wonderful > Where does the @ sign go ? > Peter > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 20 Jul 2018, at 19:01, Marie Cappart <mariecappart@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi ! > > > > Just found his email ! > > > > rob. troubley AROBASE klm-mra.be :) > > > > Best, > > > > Marie > > > > On 20 July 2018 at 19:54, Peter Patilla via DERBYSGEN < > > derbysgen@rootsweb.com> wrote: > > > >> Marie > >> Thank you so much for this info. > >> I could not find contact details for Dr Troubleyn but have winged a > couple > >> of emails away to two army museums in Brussels (mentioning his name) > hoping > >> for someone to respond. > >> > >> Fingers crossed > >> > >> Peter > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 20 Jul 2018, at 16:28, Marie Cappart <mariecappart@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> > >>> Regarding the belgian agents, you should contact Dr Troubleyn at the > >>> documentation center of the army museum in Brussels > >>> > >>> He would deff help us ( I would too if I had the time. If I happen to > be > >>> there in August I'll have a look but I can't promise) > >>> > >>> Best wishes > >>> > >>> Marie > >>> > >>> On 20 July 2018 at 16:37, Peter Patilla via DERBYSGEN < > >>> derbysgen@rootsweb.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Good afternoon. > >>>> On the original 1920 Roll of Honour for Crich there are two Belgians, > J. > >>>> De Ridder and Frank Maes. > >>>> > >>>> I know these two surnames were amongst the Belgian families who came > as > >>>> refugees to Crich and have a photograph of the families on my > >>>> www.crichparish-ww1.co.uk <http://crichparish-ww1.co.uk/> website > >>>> Obviously I am intrigued why they were included. I am making > assumptions > >>>> here – > >>>> > >>>> Were they Belgian Agents? If so, there are two possible candidates in > >> the > >>>> Medal Index Cards: > >>>> Jules Charles de Ridder Belgian Agent BWM > >>>> Rev Francois E Maes Belgian Agent BWM > >>>> > >>>> I have undertaken many searches but little seems to be recorded about > >> the > >>>> Belgian Agents (unless I have overlooked any source of records) > >>>> What I have about them is on my site. > >>>> > >>>> Should anyone know of a source of information about these little > >> recorded > >>>> men and women I would be delighted to hear. > >>>> > >>>> I only have until late September 2018 to finalise the new Roll of > Honour > >>>> before it is printed, dedicated and placed in our Community Centre and > >> also > >>>> the book to complement the Roll. > >>>> Although the website memorial will continue until I am no longer able > I > >>>> would like the Roll and Book to be as complete as possible. > >>>> > >>>> Peter > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > >>>> Unsubscribe and Archives https://mailinglists.rootsweb. > >>>> com/listindexes/search/derbysgen > >>>> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > >>>> https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > >>>> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > >>>> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal > RootsWeb > >>>> community > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> " > >>> > >>> > >>> *Move outside your comfort zones. Push yourselves. Expect more...Don’t > >> let > >>> the low standards and expectations of the world and others cause you to > >> aim > >>> beneath your nobility and ability—dream big!" ". Eline S. Dalton, "Dare > >>> Great Things".* > >>> > >>> > >>> Marie Cappart > >>> Historienne-Généalogiste > >>> mariecappart@gmail.com > >>> hist.defamilles@gmail.com > >>> http://www.histoires-de-familles.org > >>> http://www.rtbf.be/14-18 > >>> Facebook : Marie Cappart > >>> Histoires de Familles > >>> Twitter : Histdefamilles > >>> LinkedIn : Marie Cappart > >>> IBAN : BE20377021865756 > >>> BIC : BBRUBEBB > >>> > >>> > >>> Ce message est uniquement destiné aux destinataires indiqués et peut > >>> contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous n'êtes pas le > >>> destinataire, vous ne devez pas révéler le contenu de ce message ou en > >>> prendre copie. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez en > >>> informer l'expéditeur avant de le supprimer. > >>> > >>> This message may contain confidential and proprietary material for the > >> sole > >>> use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is > >>> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please > contact > >>> the sender and delete all copies. > >>> > >>> Dit bericht is enkel bestemd voor de aangeduide ontvangers en kan > >>> vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten. Als u niet de ontvanger bent, dan > >> mag u > >>> de inhoud van dit bericht niet bekendmaken noch kopiëren. Als u dit > >> bericht > >>> per vergissing ontvangen heeft, gelieve er de afzender van op de hoogte > >> te > >>> brengen en het bericht vervolgens te verwijderen > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > >>> Unsubscribe and Archives https://mailinglists.rootsweb. > >> com/listindexes/search/derbysgen > >>> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > >> https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > >>> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > >>> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > >> community > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > >> Unsubscribe and Archives https://mailinglists.rootsweb. > >> com/listindexes/search/derbysgen > >> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > >> https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > >> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > >> community > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > " > > > > > > *Move outside your comfort zones. Push yourselves. Expect more...Don’t > let > > the low standards and expectations of the world and others cause you to > aim > > beneath your nobility and ability—dream big!" ". Eline S. Dalton, "Dare > > Great Things".* > > > > > > Marie Cappart > > Historienne-Généalogiste > > mariecappart@gmail.com > > hist.defamilles@gmail.com > > http://www.histoires-de-familles.org > > http://www.rtbf.be/14-18 > > Facebook : Marie Cappart > > Histoires de Familles > > Twitter : Histdefamilles > > LinkedIn : Marie Cappart > > IBAN : BE20377021865756 > > BIC : BBRUBEBB > > > > > > Ce message est uniquement destiné aux destinataires indiqués et peut > > contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous n'êtes pas le > > destinataire, vous ne devez pas révéler le contenu de ce message ou en > > prendre copie. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez en > > informer l'expéditeur avant de le supprimer. > > > > This message may contain confidential and proprietary material for the > sole > > use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is > > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact > > the sender and delete all copies. > > > > Dit bericht is enkel bestemd voor de aangeduide ontvangers en kan > > vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten. Als u niet de ontvanger bent, dan > mag u > > de inhoud van dit bericht niet bekendmaken noch kopiëren. Als u dit > bericht > > per vergissing ontvangen heeft, gelieve er de afzender van op de hoogte > te > > brengen en het bericht vervolgens te verwijderen > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > > Unsubscribe and Archives https://mailinglists.rootsweb. > com/listindexes/search/derbysgen > > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe and Archives https://mailinglists.rootsweb. > com/listindexes/search/derbysgen > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > -- " *Move outside your comfort zones. Push yourselves. Expect more...Don’t let the low standards and expectations of the world and others cause you to aim beneath your nobility and ability—dream big!" ". Eline S. Dalton, "Dare Great Things".* Marie Cappart Historienne-Généalogiste mariecappart@gmail.com hist.defamilles@gmail.com http://www.histoires-de-familles.org http://www.rtbf.be/14-18 Facebook : Marie Cappart Histoires de Familles Twitter : Histdefamilles LinkedIn : Marie Cappart IBAN : BE20377021865756 BIC : BBRUBEBB Ce message est uniquement destiné aux destinataires indiqués et peut contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire, vous ne devez pas révéler le contenu de ce message ou en prendre copie. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez en informer l'expéditeur avant de le supprimer. This message may contain confidential and proprietary material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. Dit bericht is enkel bestemd voor de aangeduide ontvangers en kan vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten. Als u niet de ontvanger bent, dan mag u de inhoud van dit bericht niet bekendmaken noch kopiëren. Als u dit bericht per vergissing ontvangen heeft, gelieve er de afzender van op de hoogte te brengen en het bericht vervolgens te verwijderen