Hi Nick Sorry I thought it was posted on the list a few days ago Yes too good to last I am afraid A week or so back the change happened, I presume its due to a change by the record owners Its not the first record set to have this change They will still be available at an LDS FHS but that is no help for most Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 15-Mar-17 9:24 PM, Nick Higton via DERBYSGEN wrote: > For the past few months, I've been able to view, on FamilySearch at > home, digital images of a number of Derbyshire Parish Registers, > including Wirksworth. > > This week, I'm denied access to view and get a message stating they are > only viewable to signed-in members of supporting organizations > (presumably LDS), or when using the site at a family history center. > > Is it just me, or was it too good to last?

For the past few months, I've been able to view, on FamilySearch at home, digital images of a number of Derbyshire Parish Registers, including Wirksworth. This week, I'm denied access to view and get a message stating they are only viewable to signed-in members of supporting organizations (presumably LDS), or when using the site at a family history center. Is it just me, or was it too good to last?

>> >>Mark Smith posted: "... with the original >>survey book alongside which it was created. >>Plans and survey books are easily separated.  >>They are superficially very different: a survey >>may look like a standard hardback of several >>pages, and the plan that goes with it may be a si" >>Respond to this post by replying above this line >> >> >> >>New post on Derbyshire Record Office >> >> >> >> >> >>[] >> >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/author/markpsmith/> >>[] >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/author/markpsmith/> >> >> >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/14/i-love-it-when-a-plan-comes-together/>I >>love it when a plan comes together… >> >> >> >> >> >>by <https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/author/markpsmith/>Mark Smith >> >>... with the original survey book alongside which it was created. >> >>Plans and survey books are easily separated.  >>They are superficially very different: a survey >>may look like a standard hardback of several >>pages, and the plan that goes with it may be a >>single sheet, rolled up or folded.  The >>difference in size and shape means the pair of >>items are unlikely to be stored on the same >>shelf or in the same box.  In fact, each might >>be so useful on its own that from time to time, >>their custodians forget that they two items >>were designed to complement one another. >> >>Here's how they work together.  See the plot >>numbered 358 on this poor rate plan of >>Brimington dating from 1827? I have highlighted it with a black arrow. >> >>D177 A PC 37 >> >> >>If I want to find out more about it, I can look >>at the survey book, and see that it was a >>Blacksmith's shop and hovel, owned and occupied >>by George Richards, amounting to three perches in area. >> >>D636 A PO 1 >> >> >>When Brimington Parish Council was created, as >>a consequence of the Local Government Act of >>1894, the civil functions of Brimington parish >>began to be administered under a separate >>authority for the first time.  The church >>parish, meanwhile, retained its ecclesiastical >>duties.  In the division of assets, whether by >>accident or design, the new parish council got >>to keep the book, while the church held on to >>the plan.  Come the 1960s, each of these >>bodies began to deposit its historic records >>here, so that the survey and plan ended up in separate collections. >> >>Today I added a cross-reference to the >>catalogue, and I believe it was the first time >>that anyone at our end had linked the two >>things together - although I gather from a >>researcher who visited today that both >>documents are mentioned by Philip J Cousins in >>his "Brimington : the changing face of a >>Derbyshire village", published to celebrate the >>100th anniversary of the parish council. >> >>If you ever want to >><http://www.derbyshire.gov.uk/leisure/record_office/visiting_us/>visit >>us to use the documents in our search room, or >><http://www.derbyshire.gov.uk/leisure/record_office/services/copying_and_research_service/default.asp>order >>a paid search of their contents, here are the >>all-important reference numbers: the book is >>D636/A/PO/1, and the plan is D177/A/PC/37. >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/author/markpsmith/>Mark >>Smith | 14 March 2017 at 4:50 pm | Tags: >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/1820s/>1820s, >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/brimington/>Brimington, >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/plans/>Plans, >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/poor-rate/>poor >>rate | Categories: >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/category/discoveries/>Discoveries, >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/category/news/>News >>| URL: <http://wp.me/p1jCye-2UQ>http://wp.me/p1jCye-2UQ >> >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/14/i-love-it-when-a-plan-comes-together/#respond>Comment >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/14/i-love-it-when-a-plan-comes-together/#comments>See >>all comments >> >><https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=bba82ab2519c1b6a78d8a94fa8662ac9&email=annete%40aapt.net.au&b=Lah3Ix%7CR%5DgSj8%25Rp-fug%7EJotHWhl2%7CQ-BO%25bPsd98HLsJ-4oOE>Unsubscribe >>to no longer receive posts from Derbyshire >>Record Office. Change your email settings at >><https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=bba82ab2519c1b6a78d8a94fa8662ac9&email=annete%40aapt.net.au>Manage >>Subscriptions. >> >>Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: >><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/14/i-love-it-when-a-plan-comes-together/>https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/14/i-love-it-when-a-plan-comes-together/ >> >><https://wordpress.com>Thanks for flying with >>[] >> <https://wordpress.com>WordPress.com

Hello Eric Have you considered the marriage between John MILLWARD and Margaret BARNET at Cubley 19 Feb 1787. This isn`t far from Snelston. best wishes Marjorie Ward Sources for Disley; Lyme Handley; Taxal & Whaley www.disley.net Sources for NWDby incl Chapel; Charlesworth; Chinley; Fernilee; Glossop; Hayfield; Hope Valley; Mellor & New Mills http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~dusk

As a last resort I would like to enlist the resources of this list in helping me to trace back from my 2xg g grandfather Benjamin MILWARD please. He was baptised at Snelston on 14th September 1790. His parents were John and Margaret but that is all I have been able to find out about them. Benjamin married Hannah RADFORD who I believe was from Colton, Staffordshire. He was an "ag lab" and they lived in the Fenny Bentley area for some time. Benjamin was buried at Ashbourne on 18th May 1834 when his address was Hanging Bridge between Ashbourne and Mayfield. In In 1841 Hannah was employed (and probably lived) at Wood Eaves Mill on Bentley Brook, Tissington. I have a John and Margaret marrying at Fenny Bentley on 27th October 1817 but they are too young to be Benjamin's parents. There is a burial of a Margaret MILLWARD aged 79 (i.e.born 1758) of Fenny Bentley at Tissington, Derbyshire on 17 December 1837 and also at Tissington a MI for John MILLWARD died Nov 14 1841 aged 75 years (i.e. b 1766). They are possibilities but I have no further information about them and MIL(L)WARD was not a rare name in Fenny Bentley at that time. Ref.The MILLWARD Murders!! Thank you for reading this Eric Millward

Jim Thank you for the email I have spent some time looking through what I have on the Lynams looking for a likely George b c1746 sadly to no avail The Derbyshire Lynam family were certainly centred around North Wingfield and Duffield area at this time. I will certainly follow this up and see what I can find about Lynam movement to the colonies. If I find anything interesting I will let you know All I have from Valerie's records is: Richard Lynam killed by Indians 1777 in Powell Valley. He had a brother Andrew Lynam Andrew Lynam died 1771New Castle County Delaware, married Brita John Lynam born 23/12/1631 at N Wingfield Place New Jersey I still have many, many boxes and files to examine (Valerie spent her whole adult life researching the Lynam name of Derbyshire) Peter > On 20 Feb 2017, at 22:20, James Linam via DERBYSGEN <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks so much for creating the Lynam website. My name is James Linam, and I have been trying to find a link between my South Carolina Linam’s and their English homeland for 50 years now. I have focused on Derbyshire because of the many Lynams, but without any real evidence of a link. I joined DerbysGen a couple of years ago and narrowly missed contacting Valerie Jones. An Irish DNA authority checked my DNA and concluded that my genetic “homeland" was within 10 miles of Belper. This weekend, Ancestry.com <http://ancestry.com/> allowed open access to their UK files, and I have spent several hours looking at the Lynams in Derbyshire. There seem to be two centers in the 18th century: N. Wingfield and Duffield. Christian names are, for the most part, very similar to my family. However, I’m not looking for Quakers, and I know that some Derbyshire Quakers went to Philadelphia and the Delaware valley. My oldest ancestor in America was George Linam, born about 1746 (place unknown) and died in 1815. He owned a plantation in the upcountry (highlands) of South Carolina and was, thus, a slaveholder - anathema to the Quakers. If there are Lynams remaining in Derbyshire (including your wife), who may have any insight into Linam emigrants to the American colonies in the 1740s, I would very much like to correspond with them. Also, I have done some fairly extensive y-chromosome testing through FamilyTreeDNA and have a minority haplogroup: I-1a1b. The subclades are Nordic and suggest Viking, Norman or Anglo-Saxon ancestors. But that’s all much earlier than the link I’m looking for. > > Once again, thanks for the website. Best regards, Jim Linam > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Thanks for the update Joan Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 13-Mar-17 8:10 AM, Joan M via DERBYSGEN wrote: > In case people aren't on the mailing list I've just received this: > > In the next few months a number of changes will be implemented in the London > FamilySearch Centre services at Kew. We have been based within The National > Archives at Kew since August 2011, and our planned stay of several months > has stretched to several years. The National Archives have been gracious > landlords, but our contract with them will end on 30 June 2017. Our presence > will continue at Kew in a 'legacy' mode until at least the end of March > 2019, although with mutual agreement, this could be extended. However, the

In case people aren't on the mailing list I've just received this: In the next few months a number of changes will be implemented in the London FamilySearch Centre services at Kew. We have been based within The National Archives at Kew since August 2011, and our planned stay of several months has stretched to several years. The National Archives have been gracious landlords, but our contract with them will end on 30 June 2017. Our presence will continue at Kew in a 'legacy' mode until at least the end of March 2019, although with mutual agreement, this could be extended. However, the size of presence at Kew and the type of offerings will change in June 2017. More information will be available closer to the time. Meanwhile, you should be aware of the following: Microfilm Collection The permanent microfilm collection now at Kew has been given to the Society of Genealogists. According to current plans, it will be available there starting early in June 2017, although this date may slip. See www.sog.org.uk for the Society's address, opening times and charges. For those who are not members, there is a daily or part daily charge for using the Society's resources, and also a daily charge for using a camera. It is likely that films at Kew will not be accessible from about mid-May, although this date could also slip. Further information will be given when available. FamilySearch has now digitised the film collection at Kew, and is now beginning to make some sub-collections available online to browse at any family history centre including Kew. As an example, the burials of Woodgrange Cemetery, all post-1858 record copy wills for both the Prinicipal Registry and the District Courts, and the Irish Registry of Deeds films held at Kew are now available. The rest of the Kew films have been given a very high priority in the schedule of providing digital remote access to films, but it is not possible to say when each film will appear. Legal issues may prevent some of the Kew collection from being available online. Kew films now available to browse will be able to be identified using the Salt Lake Family History Library catalogue available under 'Search' on the FamilySearch website. Go to the film number as shown in the Family History Library Catalogue filtered by 'London FamilySearch Centre' and look for the little picture of a camera to browse. Also available to browse are more than 65,000 films from the British Isles and many tens of thousands of films from other parts of the world which are not part of the Kew film collection. Note that these online films will not appear in a list of 'historical record collections' or 'browse collections' on the 'Search Records' page. Patron Short Term Films at Kew Patrons who now have short term films at Kew will be able to continue to view them at Kew, either using Kew readers or FamilySearch readers (as long as the latter are available). They will remain available to view when the permanent collection has been moved. Scans of images will continue to be available as at present. Film orders which have not yet arrived will be delivered to Kew as normal. New films to be viewed at Kew can still be ordered. We appreciate your patience while these changes occur. Sharon Hintze London FamilySearch Centre

Many thanks Margaret. Sounds good. Best Wishes, Andy. At 09:29 12/03/2017, you wrote: >In the 1851 census, she says her birthplace is Little Heaton, I think - >though it's transcribed as Littleham. And there is a Little Eaton, >according to Genuki. John is from Great Hucklow... So I think they gave >slightly different versions of the village name each time.. > >http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/DBY/Parishes > > >Margaret > > > >On 12/03/2017 08:24, Andy Micklethwaite via DERBYSGEN wrote: >> I'm tidying up place names in my database and came across an entry for someone from Heaton Derby[shire]. In wondering where it was I saw her son was from Hincklow Derby[shire]. I don't recognise either. Any ideas? >> >> The entry is for the 1861 census RG9/2551/15/25 for Hannah Thorpe, her son John, grand-daughters Ann Smith and Susannah Micklethwaite. >> >> TIA Andy >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

In the 1851 census, she says her birthplace is Little Heaton, I think - though it's transcribed as Littleham. And there is a Little Eaton, according to Genuki. John is from Great Hucklow... So I think they gave slightly different versions of the village name each time.. http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/DBY/Parishes Margaret On 12/03/2017 08:24, Andy Micklethwaite via DERBYSGEN wrote: > I'm tidying up place names in my database and came across an entry for someone from Heaton Derby[shire]. In wondering where it was I saw her son was from Hincklow Derby[shire]. I don't recognise either. Any ideas? > > The entry is for the 1861 census RG9/2551/15/25 for Hannah Thorpe, her son John, grand-daughters Ann Smith and Susannah Micklethwaite. > > TIA Andy > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I'm tidying up place names in my database and came across an entry for someone from Heaton Derby[shire]. In wondering where it was I saw her son was from Hincklow Derby[shire]. I don't recognise either. Any ideas? The entry is for the 1861 census RG9/2551/15/25 for Hannah Thorpe, her son John, grand-daughters Ann Smith and Susannah Micklethwaite. TIA Andy

I really enjoyed it - the best of the season. Sophie Raworth came over very well and it was refreshing that her ancestors seemed more like the ordinary people that most of us come across in our own trees. And sadly for her the same disappointments that we all find when something does not match up with the family stories. Bob Nottingham -----Original Message----- From: DERBYSGEN [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nivard Ovington via DERBYSGEN Sent: 08 March 2017 21:02 To: [email protected] Cc: Nivard Ovington Subject: [DBY] WDYTYA Sophie Raworth Well completely forgot all about it It was on tonight at 8pm BBC1 Good job for iplayer I say -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Well completely forgot all about it It was on tonight at 8pm BBC1 Good job for iplayer I say -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

> >Lien Gyles posted: "This Saturday, 11 March, the >Derwent Valley Mills celebrates fifteen years of >recognition as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.  >Between 11 am and 4 pm there will be all kinds >of events at the Strutts Centre in Belper, >including children's activities, guided w" >Respond to this post by replying above this line > > >New post on Derbyshire Record Office > > > >[] > ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/author/liengyles14/> >[] > > ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/07/derwent-valley-mills-celebrations-in-belper/>Derwent >Valley Mills celebrations in Belper > > > >by <https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/author/liengyles14/>Lien Gyles > >This Saturday, 11 March, the Derwent Valley >Mills celebrates fifteen years of recognition as >a UNESCO World Heritage Site.  Between 11 am >and 4 pm there will be all kinds of events at >the Strutts Centre in Belper, including >children's activities, guided walks, talks, and >stalls from forty heritage organisations.  >We'll be there with our stall, giving advice on >how to use original records for your research >and how to look after the old family >photographs, letters and books we all have >tucked away in a drawer or a box somewhere. > >Saturday > > >We hope to see you on Saturday! > > ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/author/liengyles14/>Lien >Gyles | 7 March 2017 at 9:38 am | Tags: ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/belper/>Belper, ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/childrens-activities/>Children's >activities, ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/derbyshire/>Derbyshire, ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/derwent-valley-mills-world-heritage-site/>Derwent >Valley Mills World Heritage Site, ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/strutt/>Strutt, ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/talks/>Talks, ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/tag/walks/>Walks >| Categories: ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/category/derbyshire/>Derbyshire, ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/category/events/>Events, ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/category/news/>News >| URL: <http://wp.me/p1jCye-2Tu>http://wp.me/p1jCye-2Tu > ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/07/derwent-valley-mills-celebrations-in-belper/#respond>Comment ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/07/derwent-valley-mills-celebrations-in-belper/#comments>See >all comments > ><https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=bba82ab2519c1b6a78d8a94fa8662ac9&email=annete%40aapt.net.au&b=D%3FQSksVDkR2eUM%7E%7ETN_T%3DnU51z%5DPWPn%3F.pIbke7%2Fl2%2C3F%266Bu>Unsubscribe >to no longer receive posts from Derbyshire >Record Office. Change your email settings at ><https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=bba82ab2519c1b6a78d8a94fa8662ac9&email=annete%40aapt.net.au>Manage >Subscriptions. > >Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: ><https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/07/derwent-valley-mills-celebrations-in-belper/>https://recordoffice.wordpress.com/2017/03/07/derwent-valley-mills-celebrations-in-belper/ > ><https://wordpress.com>Thanks for flying with >[] ><https://wordpress.com> WordPress.com

Thanks Annette. Andy At 22:24 07/03/2017, you wrote: >>Lien Gyles posted: "This Saturday, 11 March, the Derwent Valley Mills celebrates fifteen years of recognition as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Â Between 11 am and 4 pm there will be all kinds of events at the Strutts Centre in Belper, including children's activities, guided w" >>Respond to this post by replying above this line ...

Good afternoon Just to say I have added a new tranche of records (mainly photographs) to the www.lynamhistory.uk <http://www.lynamhistory.uk/> site I am slowly ploughing my way through Valerie Jones’s archives and adding to the site on a very regular basis. Just discovered a photo of my my wife’s great grandparents with great uncles and aunts amongst the photographs, very excited about that. Any broken/incorrect links etc I will be glad to hear about so that I can correct. Peter

Hi all Its come to my attention that orange based email accounts will cease in May this year If you have any of the following you will need to sort out a new account such as gmail and subscribe the new address, and unsubscribe the old The list of emailer is as follows Orange.net Orangehome.co.uk Wanadoo.co.uk Freeserve.co.uk Fsbusiness.co.uk Fslife.co.uk Fsmail.net Fsworld.co.uk Fsnet.co.uk Those who don't sort it out will be unceremoniously unsubscribed automatically :-( -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

Thank you Pauline. Fortunately I was able to be very specific with year and house address when ordering, so hopefully there won't be a problem. Thelma -----Original Message----- From: Pauline & Arthur Kennedy via DERBYSGEN Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 1:43 PM To: Derbyshire genealogy Cc: Pauline & Arthur Kennedy Subject: Re: [DBY] GRO > Enter the year of the event (they will search that year plus one either > side of it) You may need to be a bit careful about this. Although it is a while ago now, last time I placed a certificate order with checking points, it emerged that the search only includes checking a certain number of entries, so for a common name this may not cover all possibilities in the 3 years in question. I am not sure if this is still the case, or how I heard about it, but when I was advised that they hadn't found the birth I was looking for, I remember having to ring up to discover which entries had actually been checked, and could therefore be eliminated. I have a feeling that only 4 entries were checked. Pauline On 01/03/2017 10:45, Nivard Ovington via DERBYSGEN wrote: > Hi Thelma > > You can still order with checking points but relevant to the type of > certificate applied for (birth, marriage or death) > > There are differing checking points for each type > > It is as I described previously > > When you go to the GRO site, log in and select "Place an Order" > > On the first page select the type of cert (in this case death) > > You can add the age at death if you wish to but its available on the next > screen as well > > Lower down is a tick box for "Is the GRO Index Reference Number Known" > (yes or no) > > It defaults to no but select no if its not already selected > > Enter the year of the event (they will search that year plus one either > side of it) > > Click submit and you get a second screen which allows > > Surname of deceased > Forenames of deceased > Date of death (if known) otherwise enter 01/01/year > > Age at death (again) 0 for infants under a year > > Place of death or last known address > > Occupation of deceased > > Marital status > > There is no box to enter either parents or informants names, but parents > names would only be recorded if an infant > > I am awaiting a reply from the GRO to see if that is possible or not now > > It may be that you have to email the GRO with a specific enquiry but will > report back if and when they reply to my enquiry > > > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > On 23-Feb-17 4:16 PM, Thelma Wigley via DERBYSGEN wrote: >> Sadly it seems no longer possible to add checking points when ordering a >> certificate from the GRO, apart from the year, unless the event was >> within >> the last 50 years. > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Thank you again Nivard. I did in fact contact the GRO to enquire about their system and realised that I'd simply omitted to click 'submit' for the second screen to appear. So I now live in hope that they will be able to track down the certificate. Regards, Thelma -----Original Message----- From: Nivard Ovington via DERBYSGEN Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:45 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Nivard Ovington Subject: Re: [DBY] GRO Hi Thelma You can still order with checking points but relevant to the type of certificate applied for (birth, marriage or death) . ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

> Enter the year of the event (they will search that year plus one > either side of it) You may need to be a bit careful about this. Although it is a while ago now, last time I placed a certificate order with checking points, it emerged that the search only includes checking a certain number of entries, so for a common name this may not cover all possibilities in the 3 years in question. I am not sure if this is still the case, or how I heard about it, but when I was advised that they hadn't found the birth I was looking for, I remember having to ring up to discover which entries had actually been checked, and could therefore be eliminated. I have a feeling that only 4 entries were checked. Pauline On 01/03/2017 10:45, Nivard Ovington via DERBYSGEN wrote: > Hi Thelma > > You can still order with checking points but relevant to the type of > certificate applied for (birth, marriage or death) > > There are differing checking points for each type > > It is as I described previously > > When you go to the GRO site, log in and select "Place an Order" > > On the first page select the type of cert (in this case death) > > You can add the age at death if you wish to but its available on the > next screen as well > > Lower down is a tick box for "Is the GRO Index Reference Number Known" > (yes or no) > > It defaults to no but select no if its not already selected > > Enter the year of the event (they will search that year plus one > either side of it) > > Click submit and you get a second screen which allows > > Surname of deceased > Forenames of deceased > Date of death (if known) otherwise enter 01/01/year > > Age at death (again) 0 for infants under a year > > Place of death or last known address > > Occupation of deceased > > Marital status > > There is no box to enter either parents or informants names, but > parents names would only be recorded if an infant > > I am awaiting a reply from the GRO to see if that is possible or not now > > It may be that you have to email the GRO with a specific enquiry but > will report back if and when they reply to my enquiry > > > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > On 23-Feb-17 4:16 PM, Thelma Wigley via DERBYSGEN wrote: >> Sadly it seems no longer possible to add checking points when ordering a >> certificate from the GRO, apart from the year, unless the event was >> within >> the last 50 years. >