I've just been through the process, it's £24.95 then VAT of £5.00 gets added on. -----Original Message----- From: DERBYSGEN [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nivard Ovington via DERBYSGEN Sent: 21 March 2017 16:46 To: [email protected] Cc: Nivard Ovington Subject: Re: [DBY] FTM update re Synch function I hadn't looked at the conversion until now If a user has purchased a MacKiev FTM and are signed up for their mailing list, they can get a free update For those existing users who have had a free upgrade from FTM2014 Its a pre-order price of $30 = £24.04 After release its $40 = £32.06 For new FTM MacKiev purchasers its $80 = £64.11 (conversion as of today 21st March 2017) Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 21-Mar-17 4:35 PM, John Frearson via DERBYSGEN wrote: > Hi Bob and Nivard, > > Someone's conning someone if it is parity - today the pound is > equivalent to about 1.25 dollars. so a purcahe in Dollars may well be > cheaper - if I've got it the right way round!!! > > Cheers > > John Frearson ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello Nick, The marriage to Ann Hanby took place at Ashover, 1825 May 18, John Higton of this parish and Ann Handby of this parish, by banns. The marriage at Wirksworth on the 11th of November 1822 just has John Higton of this parish and Ann Mather of this parish, banns, witnesses Thomas Mather and Thomas Pickard. Hope that helps, Sue On 21 March 2017 at 22:53, Nick Higton via DERBYSGEN <[email protected] > wrote: > Could I please ask if some kind soul would lookup one, maybe two, > marriages on the microfilms in the Derbyshire Record Office relating to > John Higton, born 09 Jan 1784 at Wirksworth? > > I am reasonably confident that the maiden name of John's wife was Hanby or > Handby, and that she was born in Lea DBY in about 1800. I have a possible > marriage at Wirksworth on 11 Nov 1822, for John Higton to Ann Mather but, > if this is the correct marriage, she must have been a widow. Could someone > please check if the PR records her marital status and, if so , was she a > widow or a spinster? > > If she was a spinster, then this marriage is not the correct one, so a > marriage at Dethick was appear to be the most likely, and with a probable > date range 1820 - 1826. Could sks please search for this too? > > This date range is because I have baptisms for two children on John and > Ann: Mary Ellen born on 21 Sep 1823 at Wirksworth, and George baptised on > 07 May 1826 at Dethick (Ince records George as their only child). These > may, or may not, be children of the same parents, of course. > > Thanks, Nick > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Here is the conversion as of today: 1 GBP =1.24561USD >From http://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=1&From=GBP&To=USD Jack Kansas City, MO

Could I please ask if some kind soul would lookup one, maybe two, marriages on the microfilms in the Derbyshire Record Office relating to John Higton, born 09 Jan 1784 at Wirksworth? I am reasonably confident that the maiden name of John's wife was Hanby or Handby, and that she was born in Lea DBY in about 1800. I have a possible marriage at Wirksworth on 11 Nov 1822, for John Higton to Ann Mather but, if this is the correct marriage, she must have been a widow. Could someone please check if the PR records her marital status and, if so , was she a widow or a spinster? If she was a spinster, then this marriage is not the correct one, so a marriage at Dethick was appear to be the most likely, and with a probable date range 1820 - 1826. Could sks please search for this too? This date range is because I have baptisms for two children on John and Ann: Mary Ellen born on 21 Sep 1823 at Wirksworth, and George baptised on 07 May 1826 at Dethick (Ince records George as their only child). These may, or may not, be children of the same parents, of course. Thanks, Nick

On the website it gives you the option to choose which country you are in - US, Canada, Europe or Australia. I have not checked the others but US takes you to a page where the price is $29.95 and Europe takes you to a page where the price is quoted as £29.95 Bob Butler Nottingham -----Original Message----- From: DERBYSGEN [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nivard Ovington via DERBYSGEN Sent: 21 March 2017 16:46 To: [email protected] Cc: Nivard Ovington <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DBY] FTM update re Synch function I hadn't looked at the conversion until now If a user has purchased a MacKiev FTM and are signed up for their mailing list, they can get a free update For those existing users who have had a free upgrade from FTM2014 Its a pre-order price of $30 = £24.04 After release its $40 = £32.06 For new FTM MacKiev purchasers its $80 = £64.11 (conversion as of today 21st March 2017) Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 21-Mar-17 4:35 PM, John Frearson via DERBYSGEN wrote: > Hi Bob and Nivard, > > Someone's conning someone if it is parity - today the pound is > equivalent to about 1.25 dollars. so a purcahe in Dollars may well be > cheaper - if I've got it the right way round!!! > > Cheers > > John Frearson ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I hadn't looked at the conversion until now If a user has purchased a MacKiev FTM and are signed up for their mailing list, they can get a free update For those existing users who have had a free upgrade from FTM2014 Its a pre-order price of $30 = £24.04 After release its $40 = £32.06 For new FTM MacKiev purchasers its $80 = £64.11 (conversion as of today 21st March 2017) Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 21-Mar-17 4:35 PM, John Frearson via DERBYSGEN wrote: > Hi Bob and Nivard, > > Someone's conning someone if it is parity - today the pound is > equivalent to about 1.25 dollars. so a purcahe in Dollars may well be > cheaper - if I've got it the right way round!!! > > Cheers > > John Frearson

Hi Bob and Nivard, Someone's conning someone if it is parity - today the pound is equivalent to about 1.25 dollars. so a purcahe in Dollars may well be cheaper - if I've got it the right way round!!! Cheers John Frearson -----Original Message----- From: Bob Butler via DERBYSGEN Sent: Tuesday, 21 March, 2017 4:26 PM To: Derbyshire genealogy Cc: Bob Butler Subject: Re: [DBY] FTM update re Synch function Thanks for the news Nivard, I expect that Mackiev will be sending emails out in due course. Having checked out the details on their site I was shocked to learn that the US Dollar now has parity with the UK Pound - numbers are the same regardless of which currency you use!!! I wonder what will happen if I select to buy in dollars and let my CC company sort out the exchange rate. Bob Butler Nottingham Software MacKiev introduces FamilySync™ Last year, Ancestry announced that Software MacKiev had acquired Family Tree Maker and that together we would ensure a smooth transition for users. From the beginning, our common goal was to maintain the capability to sync Family Tree Maker trees with online Ancestry Member Trees and we’re pleased to announce that we have done just that. Over the past year, we’ve worked together to co-develop a new syncing technology which Software MacKiev engineers have incorporated into the upcoming Family Tree Maker 2017. The new technology, which Software MacKiev calls FamilySync, will replace Ancestry’s TreeSync® when the new edition is released. More on the following link <https://support.mackiev.com/244426-FamilySync-to-replace-TreeSync-in-FTM-2017> -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Bob When I have used a CC in foreign currency there has been a small charge for currency conversion on that day but it wasn't much as I recall Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 21-Mar-17 4:26 PM, Bob Butler wrote: > Thanks for the news Nivard, > > I expect that Mackiev will be sending emails out in due course. > Having checked out the details on their site I was shocked to learn that the US Dollar now has parity with the UK Pound - numbers are the same regardless of which currency you use!!! > > I wonder what will happen if I select to buy in dollars and let my CC company sort out the exchange rate. > > Bob Butler > Nottingham

Thanks for the news Nivard, I expect that Mackiev will be sending emails out in due course. Having checked out the details on their site I was shocked to learn that the US Dollar now has parity with the UK Pound - numbers are the same regardless of which currency you use!!! I wonder what will happen if I select to buy in dollars and let my CC company sort out the exchange rate. Bob Butler Nottingham Software MacKiev introduces FamilySync™ Last year, Ancestry announced that Software MacKiev had acquired Family Tree Maker and that together we would ensure a smooth transition for users. From the beginning, our common goal was to maintain the capability to sync Family Tree Maker trees with online Ancestry Member Trees and we’re pleased to announce that we have done just that. Over the past year, we’ve worked together to co-develop a new syncing technology which Software MacKiev engineers have incorporated into the upcoming Family Tree Maker 2017. The new technology, which Software MacKiev calls FamilySync, will replace Ancestry’s TreeSync® when the new edition is released. More on the following link <https://support.mackiev.com/244426-FamilySync-to-replace-TreeSync-in-FTM-2017> -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

Software MacKiev introduces FamilySync™ Last year, Ancestry announced that Software MacKiev had acquired Family Tree Maker and that together we would ensure a smooth transition for users. From the beginning, our common goal was to maintain the capability to sync Family Tree Maker trees with online Ancestry Member Trees and we’re pleased to announce that we have done just that. Over the past year, we’ve worked together to co-develop a new syncing technology which Software MacKiev engineers have incorporated into the upcoming Family Tree Maker 2017. The new technology, which Software MacKiev calls FamilySync, will replace Ancestry’s TreeSync® when the new edition is released. More on the following link <https://support.mackiev.com/244426-FamilySync-to-replace-TreeSync-in-FTM-2017> -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

Peter - Thanks for checking. Jim > On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:55 AM, Peter Patilla via DERBYSGEN <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jim > Thank you for the email > > I have spent some time looking through what I have on the Lynams looking for a likely George b c1746 sadly to no avail > > The Derbyshire Lynam family were certainly centred around North Wingfield and Duffield area at this time. > I will certainly follow this up and see what I can find about Lynam movement to the colonies. If I find anything interesting I will let you know > > All I have from Valerie's records is: > Richard Lynam killed by Indians 1777 in Powell Valley. He had a brother Andrew Lynam > Andrew Lynam died 1771New Castle County Delaware, married Brita > > John Lynam born 23/12/1631 at N Wingfield Place New Jersey > > I still have many, many boxes and files to examine (Valerie spent her whole adult life researching the Lynam name of Derbyshire) > > Peter > > >> On 20 Feb 2017, at 22:20, James Linam via DERBYSGEN <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks so much for creating the Lynam website. My name is James Linam, and I have been trying to find a link between my South Carolina Linam’s and their English homeland for 50 years now. I have focused on Derbyshire because of the many Lynams, but without any real evidence of a link. I joined DerbysGen a couple of years ago and narrowly missed contacting Valerie Jones. An Irish DNA authority checked my DNA and concluded that my genetic “homeland" was within 10 miles of Belper. This weekend, Ancestry.com <http://ancestry.com/> allowed open access to their UK files, and I have spent several hours looking at the Lynams in Derbyshire. There seem to be two centers in the 18th century: N. Wingfield and Duffield. Christian names are, for the most part, very similar to my family. However, I’m not looking for Quakers, and I know that some Derbyshire Quakers went to Philadelphia and the Delaware valley. My oldest ancestor in America was George Linam, born about 1746 (place unknown) and died in 1815. He owned a plantation in the upcountry (highlands) of South Carolina and was, thus, a slaveholder - anathema to the Quakers. If there are Lynams remaining in Derbyshire (including your wife), who may have any insight into Linam emigrants to the American colonies in the 1740s, I would very much like to correspond with them. Also, I have done some fairly extensive y-chromosome testing through FamilyTreeDNA and have a minority haplogroup: I-1a1b. The subclades are Nordic and suggest Viking, Norman or Anglo-Saxon ancestors. But that’s all much earlier than the link I’m looking for. >> >> Once again, thanks for the website. Best regards, Jim Linam >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

So we will just have to wait and see, obviously no-one is giving much away. Might do a tongue in cheek question to Ancestry tomorrow J From: Celia Renshaw [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 17 March 2017 17:02 To: Nick Higton; Derbyshire genealogy Cc: Joan M Subject: Re: [DBY] FW: Parish Register Images on FamilySearch Yep, same here - I thought it was going to be FMP too, but maybe Ancestry offered a better deal... Celia Renshaw Chesterfield, Derbyshire On 17 March 2017 at 16:57, Nick Higton via DERBYSGEN <[email protected]> wrote: I thought it might be something like this, although the DRO told me last year that they had signed a contract with FindMyPast. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Joan M" <[email protected]> To: "'Derbyshire genealogy'" <[email protected]> Sent: 17/03/2017 14:54:15 Subject: Re: [DBY] FW: Parish Register Images on FamilySearch And the reply from the DRO: 'Thank you for your email received 17 March 2017. I am afraid we are unable to say why images that have previously been on Family Search are no longer available, and are particularly intrigued by the statement from Family Search saying that they cannot confirm why the images are no longer available. However, we speculate that it may be a negotiation between Ancestry and Family Search given that Ancestry are in the process of preparing Derbyshire parish registers to be made available through their site. Although we have not been involved in any conversations with Family Search about the images on their site, we believe that Ancestry and Family Search may have had a conversation about this.' Joan -----Original Message----- From: DERBYSGEN [mailto:derbysgen-bounces+joan.m.wheeldon <mailto:derbysgen-bounces%2Bjoan.m.wheeldon> [email protected]] On Behalf Of John Green via DERBYSGEN Sent: 17 March 2017 11:22 To: [email protected] Cc: John Green Subject: Re: [DBY] FW: Parish Register Images on FamilySearch Hi Joan, The custodian will be DRO. They may be further limited for some records by permissions granted (or not) by the Bishop. Sheffield is a notorious blackspot for access since the Bishop seems reluctant to grant permission. regards John On 2017-03-17 12:03, Joan M via DERBYSGEN wrote: And here is the quote from the FS website ' Whether images can be viewed depends on requirements or restrictions imposed on the collection by the records custodians.' I assume the custodians are the Derbyshire Records Office. -----Original Message----- From: Joan M [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 16 March 2017 14:46 To: 'Derbyshire genealogy' Subject: RE: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch Interestingly the records are now showing as being updated on 28 Feb 2017 whereas previously it was Apr 2015 so this might have been the trigger. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Yep, same here - I thought it was going to be FMP too, but maybe Ancestry offered a better deal... Celia Renshaw Chesterfield, Derbyshire On 17 March 2017 at 16:57, Nick Higton via DERBYSGEN <[email protected] > wrote: > I thought it might be something like this, although the DRO told me last > year that they had signed a contract with FindMyPast. > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Joan M" <[email protected]> > To: "'Derbyshire genealogy'" <[email protected]> > Sent: 17/03/2017 14:54:15 > Subject: Re: [DBY] FW: Parish Register Images on FamilySearch > > And the reply from the DRO: >> >> 'Thank you for your email received 17 March 2017. I am afraid we are >> unable >> to say why images that have previously been on Family Search are no longer >> available, and are particularly intrigued by the statement from Family >> Search saying that they cannot confirm why the images are no longer >> available. >> >> However, we speculate that it may be a negotiation between Ancestry and >> Family Search given that Ancestry are in the process of preparing >> Derbyshire >> parish registers to be made available through their site. Although we have >> not been involved in any conversations with Family Search about the images >> on their site, we believe that Ancestry and Family Search may have had a >> conversation about this.' >> >> Joan >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: DERBYSGEN >> [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf >> Of John Green via DERBYSGEN >> Sent: 17 March 2017 11:22 >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: John Green >> Subject: Re: [DBY] FW: Parish Register Images on FamilySearch >> >> Hi Joan, >> >> The custodian will be DRO. They may be further limited for some records by >> permissions granted (or not) by the Bishop. Sheffield is a notorious >> blackspot for access since the Bishop seems reluctant to grant permission. >> >> regards >> >> John >> >> >> On 2017-03-17 12:03, Joan M via DERBYSGEN wrote: >> >>> And here is the quote from the FS website >>> >>> ' Whether images can be viewed depends on requirements or restrictions >>> imposed on the collection by the records custodians.' >>> >>> I assume the custodians are the Derbyshire Records Office. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Joan M [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: 16 March 2017 14:46 >>> To: 'Derbyshire genealogy' >>> Subject: RE: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch >>> >>> Interestingly the records are now showing as being updated on 28 Feb >>> 2017 whereas previously it was Apr 2015 so this might have been the >>> >> trigger. >> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

I thought it might be something like this, although the DRO told me last year that they had signed a contract with FindMyPast. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Joan M" <[email protected]> To: "'Derbyshire genealogy'" <[email protected]> Sent: 17/03/2017 14:54:15 Subject: Re: [DBY] FW: Parish Register Images on FamilySearch >And the reply from the DRO: > >'Thank you for your email received 17 March 2017. I am afraid we are >unable >to say why images that have previously been on Family Search are no >longer >available, and are particularly intrigued by the statement from Family >Search saying that they cannot confirm why the images are no longer >available. > >However, we speculate that it may be a negotiation between Ancestry and >Family Search given that Ancestry are in the process of preparing >Derbyshire >parish registers to be made available through their site. Although we >have >not been involved in any conversations with Family Search about the >images >on their site, we believe that Ancestry and Family Search may have had >a >conversation about this.' > >Joan > > >-----Original Message----- >From: DERBYSGEN >[mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf >Of John Green via DERBYSGEN >Sent: 17 March 2017 11:22 >To: [email protected] >Cc: John Green >Subject: Re: [DBY] FW: Parish Register Images on FamilySearch > >Hi Joan, > >The custodian will be DRO. They may be further limited for some records >by >permissions granted (or not) by the Bishop. Sheffield is a notorious >blackspot for access since the Bishop seems reluctant to grant >permission. > >regards > >John > > >On 2017-03-17 12:03, Joan M via DERBYSGEN wrote: >> And here is the quote from the FS website >> >> ' Whether images can be viewed depends on requirements or >>restrictions >> imposed on the collection by the records custodians.' >> >> I assume the custodians are the Derbyshire Records Office. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joan M [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 16 March 2017 14:46 >> To: 'Derbyshire genealogy' >> Subject: RE: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch >> >> Interestingly the records are now showing as being updated on 28 Feb >> 2017 whereas previously it was Apr 2015 so this might have been the >trigger. >> > >

I am finding that sometimes if you go to an LDS library you can see the images on their computers Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:54, Joan M via DERBYSGEN<[email protected]> wrote: And the reply from the DRO: 'Thank you for your email received 17 March 2017. I am afraid we are unable to say why images that have previously been on Family Search are no longer available, and are particularly intrigued by the statement from Family Search saying that they cannot confirm why the images are no longer available. However, we speculate that it may be a negotiation between Ancestry and Family Search given that Ancestry are in the process of preparing Derbyshire parish registers to be made available through their site. Although we have not been involved in any conversations with Family Search about the images on their site, we believe that Ancestry and Family Search may have had a conversation about this.' Joan -----Original Message----- From: DERBYSGEN [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Green via DERBYSGEN Sent: 17 March 2017 11:22 To: [email protected] Cc: John Green Subject: Re: [DBY] FW: Parish Register Images on FamilySearch Hi Joan, The custodian will be DRO. They may be further limited for some records by permissions granted (or not) by the Bishop. Sheffield is a notorious blackspot for access since the Bishop seems reluctant to grant permission. regards John On 2017-03-17 12:03, Joan M via DERBYSGEN wrote: > And here is the quote from the FS website > > ' Whether images can be viewed depends on requirements or restrictions > imposed on the collection by the records custodians.' > > I assume the custodians are the Derbyshire Records Office. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joan M [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 16 March 2017 14:46 > To: 'Derbyshire genealogy' > Subject: RE: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch > > Interestingly the records are now showing as being updated on 28 Feb > 2017 whereas previously it was Apr 2015 so this might have been the trigger. > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

And the reply from the DRO: 'Thank you for your email received 17 March 2017. I am afraid we are unable to say why images that have previously been on Family Search are no longer available, and are particularly intrigued by the statement from Family Search saying that they cannot confirm why the images are no longer available. However, we speculate that it may be a negotiation between Ancestry and Family Search given that Ancestry are in the process of preparing Derbyshire parish registers to be made available through their site. Although we have not been involved in any conversations with Family Search about the images on their site, we believe that Ancestry and Family Search may have had a conversation about this.' Joan -----Original Message----- From: DERBYSGEN [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Green via DERBYSGEN Sent: 17 March 2017 11:22 To: [email protected] Cc: John Green Subject: Re: [DBY] FW: Parish Register Images on FamilySearch Hi Joan, The custodian will be DRO. They may be further limited for some records by permissions granted (or not) by the Bishop. Sheffield is a notorious blackspot for access since the Bishop seems reluctant to grant permission. regards John On 2017-03-17 12:03, Joan M via DERBYSGEN wrote: > And here is the quote from the FS website > > ' Whether images can be viewed depends on requirements or restrictions > imposed on the collection by the records custodians.' > > I assume the custodians are the Derbyshire Records Office. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joan M [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 16 March 2017 14:46 > To: 'Derbyshire genealogy' > Subject: RE: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch > > Interestingly the records are now showing as being updated on 28 Feb > 2017 whereas previously it was Apr 2015 so this might have been the trigger. >

Hi Joan, The custodian will be DRO. They may be further limited for some records by permissions granted (or not) by the Bishop. Sheffield is a notorious blackspot for access since the Bishop seems reluctant to grant permission. regards John On 2017-03-17 12:03, Joan M via DERBYSGEN wrote: > And here is the quote from the FS website > > ' Whether images can be viewed depends on requirements or restrictions > imposed on the collection by the records custodians.' > > I assume the custodians are the Derbyshire Records Office. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joan M [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 16 March 2017 14:46 > To: 'Derbyshire genealogy' > Subject: RE: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch > > Interestingly the records are now showing as being updated on 28 Feb 2017 > whereas previously it was Apr 2015 so this might have been the trigger. > > -----Original Message----- > From: DERBYSGEN > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Nivard Ovington via DERBYSGEN > Sent: 15 March 2017 21:38 > To: [email protected] > Cc: Nivard Ovington > Subject: Re: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch > > Hi Nick > > Sorry I thought it was posted on the list a few days ago > > Yes too good to last I am afraid > > A week or so back the change happened, I presume its due to a change by the > record owners > > Its not the first record set to have this change > > They will still be available at an LDS FHS but that is no help for most > > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > . >

And here is the quote from the FS website ' Whether images can be viewed depends on requirements or restrictions imposed on the collection by the records custodians.' I assume the custodians are the Derbyshire Records Office. -----Original Message----- From: Joan M [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 16 March 2017 14:46 To: 'Derbyshire genealogy' Subject: RE: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch Interestingly the records are now showing as being updated on 28 Feb 2017 whereas previously it was Apr 2015 so this might have been the trigger. -----Original Message----- From: DERBYSGEN [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nivard Ovington via DERBYSGEN Sent: 15 March 2017 21:38 To: [email protected] Cc: Nivard Ovington Subject: Re: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch Hi Nick Sorry I thought it was posted on the list a few days ago Yes too good to last I am afraid A week or so back the change happened, I presume its due to a change by the record owners Its not the first record set to have this change They will still be available at an LDS FHS but that is no help for most Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi all I am sure everyone is aware of the recent introduction of a search index on the GRO for some events Births to 1916 including the mothers maiden name, previously only available from 1911 and deaths with age at death to 1958 previously only in the index from 1866 And that there were two pilot phases previously The third has just gone live PDF Pilot Phase 3 We are trialling a service from 16 March to provide PDF copies of our non-digitised records. Records will not be immediately viewable, but emailed as a PDF. Applications for each PDF cost £8, must be made online and include a GRO index reference. England and Wales records which are available as PDF's in pilot 3 include: Births: 1935-2006 Deaths: 1958-2006 Marriages: 1837-2010 Full details are in About the PDF Pilot Note: A PDF is not a certificate and has no value for services where a certificate is required e.g. a Passport or Driving Licence application, or Notice of Marriage Pilot phase 3 closes at 4pm on 12 April or when 40,000 PDF's have been ordered, whichever is sooner. Analysis of the pilot will then follow. -- Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

Interestingly the records are now showing as being updated on 28 Feb 2017 whereas previously it was Apr 2015 so this might have been the trigger. -----Original Message----- From: DERBYSGEN [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nivard Ovington via DERBYSGEN Sent: 15 March 2017 21:38 To: [email protected] Cc: Nivard Ovington Subject: Re: [DBY] Parish Register Images on FamilySearch Hi Nick Sorry I thought it was posted on the list a few days ago Yes too good to last I am afraid A week or so back the change happened, I presume its due to a change by the record owners Its not the first record set to have this change They will still be available at an LDS FHS but that is no help for most Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 15-Mar-17 9:24 PM, Nick Higton via DERBYSGEN wrote: > For the past few months, I've been able to view, on FamilySearch at > home, digital images of a number of Derbyshire Parish Registers, > including Wirksworth. > > This week, I'm denied access to view and get a message stating they > are only viewable to signed-in members of supporting organizations > (presumably LDS), or when using the site at a family history center. > > Is it just me, or was it too good to last? ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message