Yes, Bill, it was. If you have Ancestry, see if this link works. If not, it was the 1900 Census from Alabama. http://search.ancestry.com/iexec/?htx=View&r=an&dbid=7602&iid=004120002_00346&fn=Pierre&ln=De+Grew&st=r&ssrc=&pid=34649454 <http://search.ancestry.com/iexec/?htx=View&r=an&dbid=7602&iid=004120002_00346&fn=Pierre&ln=De+Grew&st=r&ssrc=&pid=34649454> I'm going to put the original on the site along with the transcription. I can't remember how I got to it.... because when I tried to search just now, I couldn't find it. I might have gotten to it though someone's webpage. I think I discovered a new cousin [through this web page] and I've tried to contact him, but haven't heard anything as yet. R. William Richardson wrote: > Renee, > Was the name spelled the same on the actual census form as it was on the index. I do not have access to ancestry but do use two other databases, one did not have census for 1900 Al, could not come up with name De Grew in the other. Meawhile I ran across this listing on family search: > > http://pilot.familysearch.org/recordsearch/start.html#surname=degruy&p=recordResults&searchType=close&collection=fs%3A1307888 > > Bill > > > > > > To: GEN DEGRUY Mailing list at Rootsweb <degruy@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sat, June 19, 2010 5:44:17 PM > Subject: [DEGRUY] Mobile cousins with names misspelled in census > > Yesterday uploaded to website the 1900 census of our DeGruy cousins in > Mobile...with all 9 people in the household identified... and all with > their names misspelled De Grew. > See why it's so darn hard to do genealogical research?????? > R >