RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [DAVENPORT] A message from Doc
    2. I received the message "The Groom Was Not a Davenport". Alexa Robinson ---------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack" <nvjack@nvbell.net> To: <davenport@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 8:20 PM Subject: [DAVENPORT] A message from Doc > Cousins: > > > > Doc sent the message below to the list but never received confirmation > that > it was received. I suspect that RootsWeb is having problems with their > new > email program. > > > > Please let me know if you received Doc's message via the list. I can tell > you that I did not. > > > > Jack > > > > PAMUNKEY & OTHERS INTERESTED: > > > > Our thanks to Kyle Davenport for putting us straight in this regard: > > > > If you've got an Isaac Davenport marrying an Elizabeth Diggs in Amherst > County, Virginia, in 1789, toss it out. Amherst Diggs/Digges Family > records > have parents for an Elizabeth, her birthdate, her marriage date, and her > death date. She married Isaac Darnielle. How Darnielle, even in > extremely > illegible script could be taken for Davenport, we know not, but it was and > became Davenport gospel. > > > > We can affirm that no tracks have been found for an Isaac Davenport > among 18th Century Pamunkeys, in Amherst or elsewhere in Virginia, and are > appreciative in being able to cross him off the list of untraced family > members. > > > > So, if you have an Isaac Davenport in the list of children attributed > to > Joseph Davenport (c1740-1817?) of Amherst, eldest son of Richard Davenport > of Albemarle, who was the eldest son of Richard Davenport, Sr., of > Caroline, > who was the second son of Davis Davenport of King William, the Pamunkey > Patriarch, cross him out. > > > > Win a few, lose a few. > > > > John Scott Davenport > > Holmdel, NJ > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > DAVENPORT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    12/08/2006 09:29:36
  1. 12/08/2006 08:59:43