In a message dated 1/21/2003 9:37:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: > For some individuals (ie, me with a > bastard great grandfather), getting a match in a surname study would be > "success" (since the father and family have "supposedly" been identified). > > Sorry...I should have said that my "bastard" great grandfather Hugh LawsonWhite Hill was NOT a Davenport. I'm sure that there were no nonpaternal events amongst the Davenports!! (At least you all haven't told any good stories about wayward ancestors on this list...How they ever married in with my children's paternal Hunters I'll never know! Janet Hunter