Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 3/3
    1. Re: [DAVENPORT] Excuse Me?
    2. Steven C. Perkins
    3. Whoa, there. That was an example. I happen to come from the Davis Davenport line so it is the one I am most familiar with. No slight was intended to anyone else. Please do not ascribe something to me I did not say. I assume we are all trying to get to the truth about our ancestors. I don't know the details of everyone's previous relationships vis-a-vis their documentary research, theories of relationships, etc. I'd like to see us use all the resources available to answer the question of our ancestry. Y DNA seems to be one method not yet used by the Davenport family which I think we should consider applying to our research. Regards, Steven C. Perkins On 16 Jan 2003 at 11:45, [email protected] wrote: Date forwarded: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:46:14 -0700 Date sent: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:45:59 -0500 (EST) Forwarded by: [email protected] From: [email protected] Subject: [DAVENPORT] Excuse Me? To: [email protected] Send reply to: [email protected] Mr. Perkins- You said, in part, "detailed methodical document research being done by Doc" What are we? Chopped liver? Doc's research, Davis Davenport & Native American blood, so far, has nothing to do with the research & documentation being done by Butch, myself and everyone who has contributed to the making of our site! We all work very hard, but yet, you want to credit Doc for that? This board is called "DAVENPORT-L", which to me, is indicative of ALL Davenport's. But why is it that everyone assumes Doc is responsible for all that happens here? There is more going on than Doc's work! I tried to get a Davenport board here for us northerners, rootsweb said we already had one (here). I think we should get the recognition we deserve & not be put under Doc! If everyone believes there's no connection between southern & northern-- then why is the research all being clumped together and credit given to Doc alone? As far as the Y DNA testing goes, I think it's a great idea. I've listened to the arguments from both sides and believe it's time to come to the bottom of this confusion. I'd like to place my bet on northern & southern being a part of one! I believe Butch stands behind me on this, he usually thinks/feels similarly....but just sign me.....cuzzin Teri http://DavenportFamily.1colony.com ==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== For instructions on unsubscribing or searching the list archives visit: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/group.htm ============================== To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237

    01/16/2003 05:27:14
    1. Re: [DAVENPORT] Excuse Me?
    2. Janet
    3. I was told the women can not be tested in DNA. I have question Since you and I (if were a man) are related through the Davies Davenport line and through another line (Tunnell). Here is my question. Would our DNA being that we come from Davenport line and Tunnell . Our DNA together would not work? Would this screw up the testing??? Our two lines did not marry. Just wondering Janet ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven C. Perkins" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [DAVENPORT] Excuse Me? > Whoa, there. That was an example. I happen to come from the Davis > Davenport line so it is the one I am most familiar with. No slight was > intended to anyone else. Please do not ascribe something to me I did not > say. I assume we are all trying to get to the truth about our ancestors. > I don't know the details of everyone's previous relationships vis-a-vis > their documentary research, theories of relationships, etc. > > I'd like to see us use all the resources available to answer the question > of our ancestry. Y DNA seems to be one method not yet used by the > Davenport family which I think we should consider applying to our > research. > > Regards, > > Steven C. Perkins > > > > > > > On 16 Jan 2003 at 11:45, [email protected] wrote: > > Date forwarded: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:46:14 -0700 > Date sent: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:45:59 -0500 (EST) > Forwarded by: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Subject: [DAVENPORT] Excuse Me? > To: [email protected] > Send reply to: [email protected] > > Mr. Perkins- > You said, in part, "detailed methodical document research being done by > Doc" What are we? Chopped liver? Doc's research, Davis Davenport & Native > American blood, so far, has nothing to do with the research & > documentation being done by Butch, myself and everyone who has > contributed > to the making of our site! We all work very hard, but yet, you want to > credit Doc for that? This board is called "DAVENPORT-L", which to me, is > indicative of ALL Davenport's. But why is it that everyone assumes Doc is > responsible for all that happens here? There is more going on than Doc's > work! I tried to get a Davenport board here for us northerners, rootsweb > said we already had one (here). I think we should get the recognition we > deserve & not be put under Doc! If everyone believes there's no > connection > between southern & northern-- then why is the research all being clumped > together and credit given to Doc alone? > > As far as the Y DNA testing goes, I think it's a great idea. I've > listened > to the arguments from both sides and believe it's time to come to the > bottom of this confusion. I'd like to place my bet on northern & southern > being a part of one! > > I believe Butch stands behind me on this, he usually thinks/feels > similarly....but just sign me.....cuzzin Teri > > http://DavenportFamily.1colony.com > > > ==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== > For instructions on unsubscribing or searching the list archives visit: > http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/group.htm > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, > go to: http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > > ==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== > The Pamunkey Davenport Chronicles are available on CD. > Visit the link below for a free preview and instructions on ordering. > http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/chronicles.htm > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > >

    01/16/2003 05:05:42
    1. Re: [DAVENPORT] Excuse Me?
    2. Steven C. Perkins
    3. Janet: A male can only be tested for his direct male surname line. So the Y DNA test can only test males since we have the Y DNA. A male or female can be tested for the direct maternal line, the Mt DNA. Since the surname of the mother's line changes with each generation, it is more difficult to use for genealogy, but it could be used to see if the direct female line descendants of a number of women who are thought to be sisters, all have the same MtDNA and therefore might be descended from sisters. So testing either of us will not tell us anything about our Davenport or Tunnel lines since males do not pass their Mt DNA to their children. Only females pass on Mt DNA. Hope that helps. later, Steven On 16 Jan 2003 at 12:05, Janet wrote: Date forwarded: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:04:59 -0700 Date sent: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:05:42 -0600 Forwarded by: [email protected] From: Janet <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DAVENPORT] Excuse Me? To: [email protected] Send reply to: [email protected] I was told the women can not be tested in DNA. I have question Since you and I (if were a man) are related through the Davies Davenport line and through another line (Tunnell). Here is my question. Would our DNA being that we come from Davenport line and Tunnell . Our DNA together would not work? Would this screw up the testing??? Our two lines did not marry. Just wondering Janet ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven C. Perkins" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [DAVENPORT] Excuse Me? > Whoa, there. That was an example. I happen to come from the Davis > Davenport line so it is the one I am most familiar with. No slight was > intended to anyone else. Please do not ascribe something to me I did > not say. I assume we are all trying to get to the truth about our > ancestors. > I don't know the details of everyone's previous relationships vis-a-vis > their documentary research, theories of relationships, etc. > > I'd like to see us use all the resources available to answer the > question of our ancestry. Y DNA seems to be one method not yet used by > the Davenport family which I think we should consider applying to our > research. > > Regards, > > Steven C. Perkins > > > > > > > On 16 Jan 2003 at 11:45, [email protected] wrote: > > Date forwarded: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:46:14 -0700 > Date sent: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:45:59 -0500 (EST) > Forwarded by: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Subject: [DAVENPORT] Excuse Me? > To: [email protected] > Send reply to: [email protected] > > Mr. Perkins- > You said, in part, "detailed methodical document research being done by > Doc" What are we? Chopped liver? Doc's research, Davis Davenport & > Native American blood, so far, has nothing to do with the research & > documentation being done by Butch, myself and everyone who has > contributed to the making of our site! We all work very hard, but yet, > you want to credit Doc for that? This board is called "DAVENPORT-L", > which to me, is indicative of ALL Davenport's. But why is it that > everyone assumes Doc is responsible for all that happens here? There is > more going on than Doc's work! I tried to get a Davenport board here for > us northerners, rootsweb said we already had one (here). I think we > should get the recognition we deserve & not be put under Doc! If > everyone believes there's no connection between southern & northern-- > then why is the research all being clumped together and credit given to > Doc alone? > > As far as the Y DNA testing goes, I think it's a great idea. I've > listened > to the arguments from both sides and believe it's time to come to the > bottom of this confusion. I'd like to place my bet on northern & > southern being a part of one! > > I believe Butch stands behind me on this, he usually thinks/feels > similarly....but just sign me.....cuzzin Teri > > http://DavenportFamily.1colony.com > > > ==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== > For instructions on unsubscribing or searching the list archives visit: > http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/group.htm > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy > records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > > ==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== > The Pamunkey Davenport Chronicles are available on CD. > Visit the link below for a free preview and instructions on ordering. > http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/chronicles.htm > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy > records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > ==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== The Pamunkey Davenport Chronicles are available on CD. Visit the link below for a free preview and instructions on ordering. http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nvjack/davnport/chronicles.htm ============================== To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237

    01/16/2003 06:23:37