In a message dated 1/26/03 7:01:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: > This is how we see things: > > Orme &unknown > Richard b. 1136 &Anabilia Venables > Thomas b. 1189 &unknown > Richard &unknown > Vivian b.ca. 1200 &Beatrix de Hulme > Roger b. 1228 &Mary Salmon > Thomas b. 1250 &Agnes Macclesfield > Thomas b. 1280 &Elizabeth Davenport > John b. 1330 &Alice Bromhall > Robert b. 1365 &Joan Assheton > John b. 1419 &Cicely Warren > William b. 1446 &Margery Legh > William b. 1472 &Blanch Warburton > William b. 1521 &Margaret Booth > William b. 1543 &Margaret Assheton > William b. 1563 &Dorothy Warren > Thomas b. 1580 &Mary Forth > Thomas b. 1615 &Mary Pittman > > Hello, It seems you left out a generation. Robert de Davenport & Joan Assheton had a son Robert de Davenport m. Alice Fitton & they were the parents of John who married Cicely Warren. Also, Ormerod in his "History of Cheshire" does not show a son Thomas to William de Davenport & Dorothy Warren, nor are there any of the surname Forth or Pittman in the index of the 3 volumes. I would be curious to learn the source of Thomas & Mary Forth. Bob McKeon