Would anyone on the list know who the Joshua Devenport is on here??? Thanks, Duane Davenport http://www.pa-roots.com/~bedford/taxlists/ta1768brovall.html<http://www.pa-roots.com/~bedford/taxlists/ta1768brovall.html>

Does anyone have a high resolution Davenport Coat-of-Arms graphic that they are willing to share with me? I realize the graphic file may be somewhat large, but I utilize broadband. If you are willing to share a copy with me, would you please send it to me direct? Thank you and kindest regards, Don (Davenport) Crawford DCraw4d@austin.rr.com

Dear Doc, Sorry to hear about your torm damage. I got some damage in Norfolk and hope to go there in a week or so on my way to Abingdon. I luckily had a 12,000 watt generator installed by Dominion Power last year and it worked flawlessly, coming on after a 15 second outage and fed by my house natural gas supply. Did I tell you I am trying to buy a small house wonderfully located in Abingdon but needs lots of work. Am awaiting bank appraisal and hope to set closing date in next couple of weeks/ Today was the first day that my vision (suffering from microvasculr cranial nerve palsy) seems better. See my eye doctor tomorrow and specialist next week. Enjoyed your piece about Thomas Davenpory as did Chris Brown he faxed a copy of it to Leslie Davenport who is a retired college prof living in Savannah and with whom I spent some time recently in Abingdon. All the best and hope you are fully back in business and normal life by now. LOU.

PAMUNKEY DAVENPORTS & OTHERS INTERESTED: As we review early abstracts and extracts of Pamunkey related last testaments in Post Revolution Virginia, we find ourselves correcting dates, names, and occasionally facts. Sometimes completely changing the tenor of the long accepted abstract. A case in point is the will of Sarah Cantrell of Bedford County made 4Dec1783 wherein, as a last item before naming her executors, Sarah has long been credited with favoring Glover Davenport by devising to him all the crop of corn "in the ground." The will actually says "on the ground" which totally changes the perceived nature of the bequest. It was a slam, not a benefice. It was December, corn had long been picked or was in the shock off the ground. The only corn on the ground was that considered useless and left for the hogs. Sarah was expressing her contempt for Glover, not rewarding him. Ann, Glover's wife, witnessed the document and was one of the two proofs for the will at Bedford Court on 22Mar1784. She obviously was on the good side of Sarah. On another tact: Why have previous abstracters omitted a key part of the 17Aug1792 LW&T of Richard Davenport, Sr., of Albemarle, son of Richard, Sr., of Caroline, and grandson of Davis Davenport? Richard made special provisions for a second Martin Davenport in his family, which no abstracter heretofore has apparently deigned to extract. Here's the critical verbatim excerpt: "...Slave Jenny to have freedom after wife's death. Slave Martin, age 3 next January, to be set at liberty at age 21. Slave Beck, an old female, to be set at liberty at my death." All this before any devisements or legacies to Richard's identified children. Slave Martin, per Richard, was born in Jan1790. Twenty-one years later, Martin Davenport (Free Negro), charged with one poll, appeared on the Albemarle Personal Property Tax List, on Edward Garland's List which also included Richard Gambill, William Gambill, Mourning Jouett, and Thomas Jefferson. Garland had the Lower District, did not have Charlottesville within his purview. It was the same district wherein Richard Davenport, Sr., had lived. By 1814, Martin (Free Negro) was also charged with a horse. He disappeared from Albemarle records after 1816. The peculiar aspect of the tax listing was that there was a required separate tax list for Free Negroes and Mulattos, but throughout his appearance on Albemarle lists, Martin Davenport (Free Negro), so identified, was listed with the Whites. Why? Richard, Sr.'s fourth son was Martin, subsequently the Martin Davenport of Adair County, Kentucky. Does Martin Davenport (Free Negro) have a place in the Pamunkey Family Tree? A few tidbits to titillate the risibilities or to foster a penchant to hide in the barn? John Scott Davenport Holmdel, NJ

PAMUNKEY KINFOLK & OTHERS INTERESTED: My apologies to those who have written and have received no response. My computer has been down. Tropical Storm Ernesto hit us on the Jersey Shore hard on Friday- Saturday last. We lost a gorgeous, 50-foot weeping willow that took down both power and telephone lines when it pulled loose, roots out, and fell away from the houses, the ground soaked by 36 hours of steady rain. Before the power went out, surging electricity burned out one microwave, one cable box, two fans, two clocks, two radios, and two air conditioners, and damaged one refrigerator, one computer, and four lamps. Thought we had lost the toaster too, but it went back to work this morning. The Tree Crew from Jersey Central Power & Light came at midnight Saturday and cut the tree free of the electric lines using chain saws under truck lights, and marked the line breaks. Power was finally restored late Monday, Labor Day, by a line crew from Penn Power in Pittsburgh. Got the computer into the shop early Tuesday morning, and lucked into a quick turn around because its only problem was a burned out power pack, an easily replaceable unit. Will not get Cable back before Friday, and the jury is still out on the refrigerator. We're using the old fridge in the basement, unfazed by the surge that took out the new fridge. We have saved most of the frozen food by eating it or jamming it into the old fridge. It could have been a lot worse. Will get to the mail shortly. Doc

Viola: Thomas Davenport, Jr., son of Thomas, Sr., of Cumberland, was the grandfather of Thomas Davenport, of Halifax County, Virginia, who served in Congress, 1825-1834. Thomas, Jr., was variously a planter, a storekeeper, a magistrate, a presiding justice, a sheriff, a coroner, a militia captain, and a self-taught physician. He became alienated with Cumberland County when he was denied a commission either as a Captain of Foot or as a Surgeon in the early days of the Revolution. Georgia, which raised most of its Continental Line troops in Virginia, commissioned him a Captain-Surgeon in the 3rd Battalion, Georgia Line, and he went South in 1777. He left a will directing his family to leave Cumberland and move to Halifax on pain of disinheritance. Serving in Georgia, he was captured twice by the British. The second time he was held on a prison hulk in the Savannah River below Savannah where he died in the Spring of 1780 as a prisoner-of-war. His estate was awarded two large land grants in Georgia for his service. His grandson Thomas (IV) was a Congressman, not a Senator, was born either in Cumberland or Halifax in 1781-82. John Scott Davenport Holmdel, NJ

Hi again, If I was to receive a reply I did not. I got the e-mail back that I sent you. Have a wonderful day. Hopefully we get more rain. We are in drought. The fields would burn. We did get .6 inches last night. Viola T. Skinnell

Good morning, I read with interest all your postings. Is This Thomas Davenport Jr. the Senator Davenport my great great grandfather. I can't hardly wait until I see the whole Davenport genealogy published. I appreciate what you have done and are doing. Viola Trent Skinnell

PAMUNKEY DAVENPORTS & OTHERS INTERESTED: Thomas Davenport, Sr., believed third son of Davis Davenport, had eight sons--James, Thomas, Jr., Henry, Julius, William, Stephen, Joseph, and Philemon, and one daughter--Drusilla, who followed William in the family order. Drusilla married Gideon Glenn, who appears to have been at least 15 years older than she, for he obtained 400 acres from James Terry in Goochland (Cumberland after 1748) in 1740, a full year before Daniel Terry, likely James' brother, deeded 200 acres each to Thomas Davenport, Sr.'s three eldest sons--James, Thomas, Jr., and Henry. All three Daniel Terry deeds were contiguous, located on waters of Tear Wallet and Little Guinea Creeks, within a mile or so of Gideon Glenn. James Terry and Daniel Terry are believed to have been brothers to Grace Terry, Thomas Davenport, Sr.'s wife and mother of all his children. We would note that all of Thomas, Sr.'s sons were namesakes, possibly excepting Philemon, of a Terry uncle or cousin. None of Thomas, Sr.'s sons had the name of a Davenport uncle--namely Martin, Richard, John, or Elias. Drusilla was also a Terry given name. There were numerous Drusillas among the Terrys, only one among the Davenport, and she was a daughter of Henry, son of Thomas, Sr., and his first wife, circumstantially identified as Sarah Terry, was likely a daughter of James Terry, Sr., brother of Captain Thomas Terry, Sr., who was the father of James, Daniel, and Grace. Both James, Sr., and Thomas, Sr., died in Caroline County. One can easily become disoriented and distraught dealing with the Pamunkey Terrys, for they were monotonous, if not notorious, for using the same given names over and over and for marrying first cousins. But this is a narrative concerning the Davenports and the Glenns in Cumberland in the 1770s, and how they came to a parting of the ways. Glenn first appeared in a Davenport context in 1750 when he witnessed the bond of Thomas Davenport, Jr., to marry Lucy Ransone in Cumberland. By 1752 he was surely married to Drusilla Davenport, for he was appointed Clerk of Tear Wallet Chapel, surely by recommendation of Thomas Davenport, Jr., Clerk of Vestry for St. James Southam Parish which included Tear Wallet Chapel. Glenn remained in that role for at least twenty years, while Davenport, Jr., was variously Clerk, Vestryman, or Churchwarden of Southam, and was the man who made the Parish budget annually, during the same period. Both Glenn and Davenport were paid for their clerical services and appear as such on the Parish Levy for every year, 1752-1772, when Cumberland was cut off from St. James Southam as Littleton Parish. In 1766, Glenn committed himself as a special security for William Davenport, Drusilla's brother who, with Thomas, Jr., was defending a suit for debt. In 1767 William witnessed a Slave Bill of Sale to Glenn. Glenn again was security for William that year relative to another Debt suit. In 1769 Glenn and William were securities for Molly Davenport, widow of Stephen and married to David Davenport (son of Martin, Sr., of Hanover), Thomas Davenport, Jr., and Henry Davenport, relative to a lawsuit by the Justices of Cumberland concerning their administration of the Estate of Stephen Davenport, Decd. Until Mar1775 the preponderance of the Gideon Glenn appearances in public records were in a Davenport context of one sort or another. When James Davenport, heir-at-law to his unmarried, intestate, deceased brother Joseph, sold Joseph's land to brother William in 1771, Gideon Glenn, Thomas Davenport, Jr., Henry Davenport, and Henry Ransone, Thomas, Jr.'s brother-in-law, witnessed the deed. There are at least a dozen or so more record associations which imply that a close Davenport-Glenn relationship existed before March 1775. Given that closeness, when Thomas Davenport, Sr., surely in his late 80s and "being weak in body but sound in body and mind," surely being cared for by Drusilla, made his Last Will & Testament, it was clearly dominated by Drusilla, for she was devised seven of her Father's 17 slaves, her husband Gideon was named sole executor with sole discretion to dispose of five additional slaves. The testament was witnessed by James Coleman Glenn, a brother of Gideon, and Joseph Jenkins and his wife Lucy, next door neighbors to Old Thomas' plantation. This Will was offered for probate on 27Mar1775 by Gideon Glenn and proved by the oaths of J.C. Glenn and the Jenkins. Gideon qualified as executor, bonded by Frederick Hatcher and Nathaniel Lee. Charles Lee, William Lee, Joseph Lee, and Richard Lee, or any three, all neighbors of Gideon were appointed by the Court to Inventory & Appraise Thomas, Sr.'s estate. This clearly was a power play by the Glenns to control all aspects of the estate's assets. When Thomas, Sr., died, Thomas, Jr., who was a Justice of the Quorum (meaning one of those whose appearance was required to hold a court) was in Halifax, likely attending to the affairs of his Quarter (plantation) there. He was apparently gone for some time, but when he returned the Estate of Thomas Davenport, Sr., Decd., was reprobated with a second, later Will. The second Will, made 29Sep1774, was patterned after the first testament, but Thomas, Sr., was no longer "weak in body" and disposed of his slaves in a different manner. He also cut James and Julius out of a share of a residual distribution, cut his grandson William, son of Stephen, Decd., off with a few shillings, and named three of his sons, namely Thomas, Jr., Henry, and William Davenport, and Gideon Glenn, as executors. This Will was witnessed by David Davenport and Stephen Cook. Thomas, Jr., Henry, and William qualified as executors and were bonded by Robert Smith and Archelaus Nunnally. Gideon Glenn did not qualify as an executor. If an Inventory of the estate was made by the Lees under the First Will, it was not recorded. A minimal inventory was returned under the Second Will, done by Thomas, Jr., and Henry Davenport, who reported that all they could find was a feather bed, furniture, a chest, one chamber pot, four casks, one compass, two pairs of spectacles, and eight slaves. All of the slaves legacies had been made by Thomas, Sr., before his death, they reported, leaving two or three slaves missing, apparently disposed of by Gideon Glenn during his five months as executor. There are a number of loose ends to this story, particularly as to where the Second Will, apparently unknown to the Glenns, Henry, Julius, and William Davenport, was between March and September 1775. [The three youngest sons had preceded their father in death--Stephen (No. 6) died 1765, leaving a widow, two sons, one daughter; Philemon (No, 8) by accidental death in 1767, no wife or issue known; and Joseph (No. 7) in 1770-71, no wife or issue known.] Whatever, while the records are silent as to any friction or litigation relative to the matter, it was the end of Glenn participation in Cumberland Davenport affairs and vice versa. Only two Gideon/Drusilla Glenn mentions occur in the Chronicles after the aborted 1775 power play. In early 1779, Alexious Meador Foster obtained a marriage bond to wed Ann Glenn, surely a daughter of Gideon and Drusilla, for he was bondsman for the marriage. Alexious Meador Foster was an in-law of William Davenport, son of Thomas, Sr., who had married Ann Foster and whose youngest son was named Alexious Meador Davenport. In mid-1779 Gideon and Drusilla Glenn sold their 400 acres and allegedly moved to Johnston County, North Carolina. No Davenport associations with the Gideon Glenns have been found in Cumberland records following the power play failure. John Scott Davenport Holmdel, NJ

Doc, Glad to see that you're still hard at work. The long silence had me a little concerned. I'm more concerned about accuracy than anyone's delicate sensibilities at this stage. David sounds like one of those kind of guys who's always trying to work an angle. Jason

PAMUNKEY DAVENPORTS & OTHERS INTERESTED: In the process of cleaning up loose ends in Part 2, "South of the James River," of the Chronicles, we are revisiting all of the LW&Ts (Last Will & Testatments) of the senior members of the family. It's well that we are doing so, for we are finding a great many errors between what the records say and what allegedly has been abstracted and passed around and around. Most are minor in nature, requiring only touching up and clarification. But some are momentous. The most glaring factual error encountered todate was this week when we reviewed the LW&T of David Davenport, of Cumberland, son of Martin, Sr., of Hanover, and a grandson of Davis Davenport. David, a planter-carpenter, was remarkable for his constant litigation from the mid-1740s until a month before his death in 1802. He is also notable for having married as his second wife, Molly Slaughter Davenport, widow of his cousin Stephen Davenport, sixth son of Thomas Davenport, Sr., and another grandson of Davis Davenport. David holds the family record for the number of times cast into Debtor's Prison-- at least three, Spotsylvania (twice) Cumberland (once), and maybe in Orange--the record is unclear. The abstract of David's will first encountered eight years ago, and found repeated divers places elsewhere since, includes the statement "my deceased daughter Elizabeth McNermar and my grandson William Bernard McNermar." A lot of hats have been hung on that datum. What the will actually says, per Cumberland County Court record, is "a feather bed and furniture to my daughter Elizabeth McNemar and on her death to my son William Bernard McNemar." An entirely different kettle of fish, we suggest. We know that David left Jane and Joel, children by his first wife, out of the will. Were Elizabeth and William Bernard McNemar illegitimate children of David? Elizabeth follows David's three daughters by Molly Slaughter in the will and was treated identically as to legacy with those siblings. Looks like we're going to have to review Elizabeth McNemar's and William Bernard McNemar's place on the Pamunkey genealogical chart, and check whether McNemar DNA compares with the Davenports. We suspect that the erroneous version circulated was sanitized to avoid confronting the bastardy question. Keeping in character by his legacies to his mentioned sons, namely Jesse, Martin Slaughter, Glover, and Jack Smith, David grandly devised land to all of them that was subsequently found to be either mortgaged or tied up in deeds of trust. If the daughters each got a feather bed, furniture, and a share of the sale price of the two slaves, they came out way ahead of the sons, who basically got nothing but incipient lawsuits. John Scott Davenport Holmdel, NJ

Mr.Davenport, Upon the completion of the Davenport Chronicles, are they going to be available to the Davenport decendants for purchase ? And if so, are you taking names of those who would like to purchace them ? I would like to be on that list, if permitted. Thank You, Nikki Webb-Prater You wrote: >PAMUNKEY DAVENPORTS & OTHERS INTERESTED: > > If you have come to the conclusion that publication of the "The Further >Chronicles of the Pamunkey Davenports" is never going to happen, be of good >cheer. We are in the concluding phases of the project, and are presently in >the final stages of editing of Part 1, "Beginnings and North of the James >River," and are completing the research needed to conclude Part 2, "South of the >James River." Parts 3 and 4, minor compared to Parts 1 and 2, will likely be >ready before Part 2. > > Our comprehensive research has been enhanced by the professional editing >of Dr. Judy Russell, who has, the truth be told, made life complicated if >not frustrating at times for the Old Doc. Research meticulousness has been >sharpened by editing meticulousness. Judy has questioned sources, demanded >clarifications, spotted inconsistencies, and challenged analyses in addition to >performing the mundane tasks of editing for spelling, grammar, syntax, and >style. Being a lawyer and legal scholar, she has also straightened out Doc's >analyses where he has ventured into interpreting Colonial Law. Between Doc's >research and Judy's editing, the Chronicles should be a substantial, valid >resource for future Pamunkey Davenport family searchers. A Baker offshoot from >the Pamunkey Davenports, Judy has verified that the Thomas Baker, long >identified as the husband of Dorothy Davenport, daughter of Martin, Sr., eldest son >of Davis, was not the Pennsylvanian claimed by earlier Baker researchers-- a >story that Judy can develop in her own good time. > > We are still in a quandary as to how we will make the Chronicles >available. The decision is not one of generating book sales, but one of family >history sensitivity, for the final file will contain the family warts as well as >the family achievements. The presence of Slavery is massive, particularly in >Part 2, "South of James River," where our Davenports became wealthy prime >movers in their counties and were slaveholders of note. Most of the litigation >among our Davenports post-Revolution in Virginia was Slavery related. All >of these court items are in the Chronicles. None of those litigations can be >cast in a favorable light in these days of social enlightenment, particularly >the whippings and hangings. > > We would note also that a number of illegitimate Davenports are >identified and many long circulated Davenport portrayals and claims have been >clarified, found to be spurious, and/or recast into portrayals that are closer to >what the records say. The Chronicles project, we believe, has doubled the size >of the family, at least, and has found most of the long missing or long >ignored Pamunkey Davenports in Colonial and Post-Revolution Virginia and beyond. > > The Pamunkey Davenport story is worthy of a major film production, >replete with characters of heroic proportions, particularly in the Revolution and >the War of 1812, but given the Slavery involvement is unlikely to happen. >>From apparently illegitimate beginnings in an Indian Reservation in the >Seventeenth Century we have evolved to likely the largest family of Davenports in the >United States--who have no DNA connection to the bonafide Davenports of >English Ancestry. > > Shortly hereafter, for your titillation, I will relate the story of the >two wills of Thomas Davenport, Sr., of Cumberland, likely third son of Davis >Davenport, our patriarch. Thomas, Sr., had eight sons and one daughter and >was married, circumstantial evidence strongly indicates, to Grace Terry. There >are a great many Pamunkey Davenports who have Terry blood, but that doesn't >enter in to the Two Wills of Thomas, Sr., except for the Terry given female >name of Drusilla and how she tried to slip a will into probate when her >brother Thomas, Jr., was a presiding judge of Cumberland Court. Really dumb from >an intelligence perspective, and was another Slavery involvement. > >John Scott Davenport >Holmdel, NJ > > >============================== >New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more: http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx? sourceid=14599&targetid=5429

PAMUNKEY DAVENPORTS & OTHERS INTERESTED: If you have come to the conclusion that publication of the "The Further Chronicles of the Pamunkey Davenports" is never going to happen, be of good cheer. We are in the concluding phases of the project, and are presently in the final stages of editing of Part 1, "Beginnings and North of the James River," and are completing the research needed to conclude Part 2, "South of the James River." Parts 3 and 4, minor compared to Parts 1 and 2, will likely be ready before Part 2. Our comprehensive research has been enhanced by the professional editing of Dr. Judy Russell, who has, the truth be told, made life complicated if not frustrating at times for the Old Doc. Research meticulousness has been sharpened by editing meticulousness. Judy has questioned sources, demanded clarifications, spotted inconsistencies, and challenged analyses in addition to performing the mundane tasks of editing for spelling, grammar, syntax, and style. Being a lawyer and legal scholar, she has also straightened out Doc's analyses where he has ventured into interpreting Colonial Law. Between Doc's research and Judy's editing, the Chronicles should be a substantial, valid resource for future Pamunkey Davenport family searchers. A Baker offshoot from the Pamunkey Davenports, Judy has verified that the Thomas Baker, long identified as the husband of Dorothy Davenport, daughter of Martin, Sr., eldest son of Davis, was not the Pennsylvanian claimed by earlier Baker researchers-- a story that Judy can develop in her own good time. We are still in a quandary as to how we will make the Chronicles available. The decision is not one of generating book sales, but one of family history sensitivity, for the final file will contain the family warts as well as the family achievements. The presence of Slavery is massive, particularly in Part 2, "South of James River," where our Davenports became wealthy prime movers in their counties and were slaveholders of note. Most of the litigation among our Davenports post-Revolution in Virginia was Slavery related. All of these court items are in the Chronicles. None of those litigations can be cast in a favorable light in these days of social enlightenment, particularly the whippings and hangings. We would note also that a number of illegitimate Davenports are identified and many long circulated Davenport portrayals and claims have been clarified, found to be spurious, and/or recast into portrayals that are closer to what the records say. The Chronicles project, we believe, has doubled the size of the family, at least, and has found most of the long missing or long ignored Pamunkey Davenports in Colonial and Post-Revolution Virginia and beyond. The Pamunkey Davenport story is worthy of a major film production, replete with characters of heroic proportions, particularly in the Revolution and the War of 1812, but given the Slavery involvement is unlikely to happen. From apparently illegitimate beginnings in an Indian Reservation in the Seventeenth Century we have evolved to likely the largest family of Davenports in the United States--who have no DNA connection to the bonafide Davenports of English Ancestry. Shortly hereafter, for your titillation, I will relate the story of the two wills of Thomas Davenport, Sr., of Cumberland, likely third son of Davis Davenport, our patriarch. Thomas, Sr., had eight sons and one daughter and was married, circumstantial evidence strongly indicates, to Grace Terry. There are a great many Pamunkey Davenports who have Terry blood, but that doesn't enter in to the Two Wills of Thomas, Sr., except for the Terry given female name of Drusilla and how she tried to slip a will into probate when her brother Thomas, Jr., was a presiding judge of Cumberland Court. Really dumb from an intelligence perspective, and was another Slavery involvement. John Scott Davenport Holmdel, NJ

As you may have read in your newspaper, William the Conqueror's Doomsday Book is now online and searchable at National Archives, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/domesday/ More information about the Doomsday Book can be had at this website. In the search window I entered "Davenport" and got results. (There is a small fee to download further documentation.) Have fun. Don (Davenport) Crawford

William of Rowan County, North Carolina, first listed in 1759, was also listed in Census thru 1820. He was listed in Salisbury, which is still the County Seat of Rowan County. Using the age of 19 in his first listing that would take him up to 80 years of age. Not definate but, I believe that he is a son of Isaac & Phebe. dbunch@sccc.tv

While researching another line, I found a William Davenport on the 1759 Tax List for Rowan County,NC. I can't be sure where he lived since Rowan covered the entire NW quadrant of NC at that time. Hope you can enlighten us. Elaine in GA

At 11:00 AM 7/13/2006, Mary Lou Midkiff wrote: >I wonder how the Chronicles are coming along. Have they been published yet? Apologies! I tried to send this yesterday and through pure operator error misaddressed it. The answer is that the update of the Chronicles is proving to be more time-consuming than expected as more and more material is found that needs to be incorporated. It is in the home stretch but that still is some weeks away. Once the update itself is complete, then production will begin and folks will be able to order the update. Whenever there is a firm date, it will be announced here. -- Judy (editor to Part I)

Y'all might check the Pamunkey Davenport website since the list is pretty quiet these days. It has the last bit they put out back in the fall. I'm not connected to the Pamunkeys - still have a huge wall to scale before I hook to any group. But thought maybe you missed when the website came on-line and maybe you could find some answers there. www.pamunkeydavenport.com Hope this helps! Donna --- Mary Lou Midkiff <mlmidkiff@grandecom.net> wrote: > I have been off list for awhile due to my husband's > illness. I wonder how > the Chronicles are coming along. Have they been > published yet? I really do > want a copy if they have already gone out. I am > nervous that I might have > missed the deadline because of my change of email > address and also that I > have not been available for the past 6 months. > > Mary Lou Midkiff > > > > ============================== > New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and > search for your ancestors at the same time. Share > your tree with family and friends. Learn more: > http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429 > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

I have been off list for awhile due to my husband's illness. I wonder how the Chronicles are coming along. Have they been published yet? I really do want a copy if they have already gone out. I am nervous that I might have missed the deadline because of my change of email address and also that I have not been available for the past 6 months. Mary Lou Midkiff

I just wanted to let you know I don't have anything with the making of the Further Chronicles, but that I too have requested info from the list about someone telling me how to get the 2nd cd. I have been quite ill, sorry to take so long to reply. I cannot understand why no one answers. Be Blessed, Lorene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lorene" <lovieann7@ijntb.net> To: "Mary Lou Midkiff" <mlmidkiff@grandecom.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 9:37 AM Subject: Re: Pamunkey Chronicles > Hi Mary Lou, > > Glad to see you back. I hope I'm not bring back sad memories, but did > your husband get well ? I hope so. > > I have emailed a few times about the Chronicles II but never got a reply. > > Be Blessed, > Lorene in Texas > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Lou Midkiff" <mlmidkiff@grandecom.net> > To: <DAVENPORT-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:18 PM > Subject: Pamunkey Chronicles > > >> Hi all, >> >> I have been off the list since the first of the year do to my >> husband's illness. I am now back online and I hope I did not miss the >> "Chronicles" if they were published while I was gone. If they have been >> published I hope I can still purchase my copy. >> >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Mary Lou Midkiff >> >