I wasn't trying to embarrass anyone, nor was I trying to be mean. I was only trying to be helpful. However, I apparently worded my message incorrectly. I apologize if I have offended anyone. Please, let us not have any more discussion on this subject. We're here to discuss Davenport genealogy. Jack -----Original Message----- From: Lib3646@aol.com <Lib3646@aol.com> To: DAVENPORT-L@rootsweb.com <DAVENPORT-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 3:11 AM Subject: Re: [DAVENPORT] How to UNSUBSCRIBE > >embarrassing someone and being mean never did anyone any good. maybe they >did accidently delete the welcome message, or maybe they thought we were >trying to do the right thing. This list has been very helpful for me, but for >some it may not be. I apologize for this inconvenience. I apologize that >they, like myself, probably deleted the welcome message, and it could be that >they simply did the best they could. Why be mean? > > >==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== >Visit our Genealogy Page at >http://users.intercomm.com/nvjack/davnport/davnport.htm > >============================== >Search more than 274 MILLION NAMES and find your ancestors at Ancestry.com! >Get started today at http://www.ancestry.com/rootswebtext.asp > >

Hello i am looking for a Irene Davenport who lived in Cincinnati Ohio and left to St. Petersburg florida about 15 years ago.. She left after having a mental breakdown, her daughter Billie Jo desperatly wants to let her know that she loves her and wants to find her and let her know she aint mad at her.. to finally have a relationship with her.. If you know anything at all please email me or call 513-471-1027 0r 513-251-4926 lsllwright@fuse.net

Good Morning everyone: I played hooky from work yesterday and spent the day at the NARA Branch in Atlanta and it jogged my memory to pass on some information to everyone. Prior to the US's entry into WW1 (approx. 1917-1918) every male between the age of 18 and 40 was required to register for the draft. The information found on the card was provided by the individual himself. The registration cards vary in information depending on the individual draft board. But by and large the cards include: The full name of the person (this means first, full middle name, any additional middle names and last name); the current address of the man; his age; his birthdate (some include his place of birth); whether he is a US citizen or a naturalized citizen (some ask if his father was a naturalized citizen and his father's race); his race; his occupation; where he is employed (name of employer); address or location of employment; name and address of his next of kin; some cards ask if the man is married or single and how many people he supports. The card is signed by the draftee. On the back of the card his physical description is noted: Height is broken down by short, medium, tall although some cards give the actual height in feet and inches; Build by slim, medium, stout although some cards list actual weight along with the build; color of eyes and hair; any deformities or injuries are listed (such as one arm missing, blind in one eye, etc); the name and address of the draft board and the date. When these original cards were transferred to the East Pointe NARA branch the LDS spent about 3 years microfilming these cards. There are hundreds and hundreds of boxes and the LDS opened one box at a time and filmed them - in state order. However, within each state the cards were filed by draft board, not by county or by draftee. This makes the searching of the microfilm difficult to say the least. The good news is that the Friends of the National Archives took each box after it was filmed (and checked) and sorted all of these thousands and thousands of cards into - state and then COUNTY order and then in alphabetical order by surname and put then in new boxes. The Friends deserve all the kudos we can give them for this monstrous task. So ... rather than spending hours and hours searching the LDS microfilm you can order copies of the original cards from NARA. if you know the county your ancestor lived in between 1917-1918. And BTW - Ancestry.com lists WW1 Draft cards in their searchable data bases, however I know for a fact that there are 22 cards for the surname WHITE found in McIntosh Co, OK and Ancestry only gave me 4 of them so don't depend on that site. I was told yesterday that some reps from Ancestry had visited the archives a couple of weeks ago to talk about filming the cards, took one look at the hundreds and hundreds of boxes and simply left. For copies: Send a letter requesting copy(s) to: NARA Southeast Region 1557 St. Joseph Ave East Point, GA 30344 In your letter be sure to say you want copy(s) of the WWI Draft application Cards. Include the name of your ancestor and his race, the state and the county. If you want copies of ALL of the cards with a given surname, ask them the cost of the copies and send a SASE for them to let you know the copying cost. In your letter be sure and say you want a copy of the FRONT and BACK of the card. Be sure to send a SASE for the return of you copies. The cost for the copy is 50 cents - 25 cents for the back and 25 cents for the front. If you only want one copy send a buck and say the difference is to be given to the Friends of the Archives, because after all they did all this wonderful hard work for you <VBG> If you have any other questions about the cards please write to me and I'll try to help. I've been "delving" into these cards for the past few years. But PLEASE don't ask me to get the copies for you. It is difficult for me to take the time off from work to visit the archive to do my own research <g>. And feel free to pass this on to any of the lists you are on. Linda Home Page: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~haas/ Marion Co AR: http://www.rootsweb.com/~armarion/ Washington Co NC, Haas & Hass e-mail list manager

Linda - Thank you, thank you, thank you! What a wonderful new source. I really appreciate it. MargoBelle

Dear Nevada Jack, Thanks for the information. I am always glad to learn and do not feel it is an insult to be told how. It is difficult to remember all the computer "stuff", and it is always good to learn. June Johnson

Tonight, two members tried to unsubscribe from this list, but they apparently didn't save their "Welcome Message" and didn't know how, and so they sent their request to *everyone*. They failed in their attempt to unsubscribe and are still members of this list. Rather than keep my mouth shut and manually unsubscribe them (which I *can* do), I have decided to post this reminder to all of you so that you don't make the same mistake that they did, should you chose to unsubscribe from this list. All "messages" should be sent to DAVENPORT-L@rootsweb.com All "requests" should be sent to DAVENPORT-L-request@rootsweb.com That shouldn't be *too* hard to remember. If you want to "request" to be unsubscribed from this list, put the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject, and don't add anything else. Your comments will only confuse my Robot and you will probably remain a member of this wonderful mailing list. Nevada Jack

embarrassing someone and being mean never did anyone any good. maybe they did accidently delete the welcome message, or maybe they thought we were trying to do the right thing. This list has been very helpful for me, but for some it may not be. I apologize for this inconvenience. I apologize that they, like myself, probably deleted the welcome message, and it could be that they simply did the best they could. Why be mean?

Please cancel my membership, Thank you, Martha Eden ---------- >From: VAnd800004@aol.com >To: DAVENPORT-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: [DAVENPORT] Unsubscribe >Date: Tue, Aug 17, 1999, 5:21 PM > >Please >unsubscribe > >Thanks > > >==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== >Having problems with this mailing list? Tell Nevada Jack at >nvjack@intercomm.com > >============================== >Search more than 274 MILLION NAMES and find your ancestors at Ancestry.com! >Get started today at http://www.ancestry.com/rootswebtext.asp

Please unsubscribe Thanks

Jack: Thanks. Much better. Doc

Cousins, I am re-sending Jersey Doc's article without the "forward marks" that preceded each line in the message I sent earlier. Hopefully, this will make it easier to read. Nevada Jack ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Pamunkey Davenports: Glover Davenport, first found in Louisa County (VA) Court Orders on 8Aug1743 when Matthew Jouett was ordered to pay him a one-day witness fee in Jouett's suit against Richard Brooks, has long been a problem for Pamunkey Davenport identification. By the mid-1760s he, in association variously with sons Matthew and James, appeared in Amherst County Court records, and after 1769, he appeared in Bedford County, having moved south of The James. Tracing him in land records heretofore has largely been unsuccessful beyond a 30Jul1766 mortgage in Amherst County wherein one James Bush described the land he was mortgaging as "adjoining 373 acres that James Bush bought of Glover Davenport and where John Berry lived." If anyone heretofore has located that land, they have not shared the discovery. Largely because of proximity of the Davenport and Jouett families, including the marriage of James Davenport, son of Martin of Hanover (d.1735), to Frances Jouett, daughter of Matthew Jouett of Louisa County (Louisa Courthouse was and is on his large land patent), Glover Davenport has been tentatively identified as a son of Martin also, the identification being circumstantially reinforced by the fact that additional Glover Davenports appear among Martin's descendants--and nowhere else among the Virginia Davenports. The fact that Glover Davenport's likely eldest son was named Matthew, the only recorded Virginia Davenport possessing that given name prior to the Revolution, suggests a relationship between Glover and Matthew Jouett of more than casual acquaintance. Matthew of Glover died a young man c1767, leaving two sons: Glover and John, both of whom apparently moved with their widowed mother and her new husband to Rutherford County, NC, shortly before or during the Revolution. Glover of Matthew, who did not survive the Revolution, appears to have been the Glover Davenport cited among the South Carolina Patriots. [Of all the Davenports in South Carolina during the Revolution, only two, namely Glover and Francis Davenport (a Newberry), have been certified as South Carolina Patriots]. The tracing of family lines relative to Glover [Sr.], his son Matthew, his son Glover [Jr.], and Glover [Jr.]'s brother John is crucial to Glover, Sr.'s identification, for Glover, Sr., appears to have died intestate c1785 and without having perfected title to his 220-acre tract, which apparently lay on Maggodee Creek, a draught of Staunton River, in that part of Bedford County that went into Franklin County in 1785. A suit to clear the title to the tract was brought in Franklin County Court by John Campbell in 1803 against Glover Davenport and John Davenport, sons of Matthew Davenport, Decd. Under Virginia law at the time of Glover, Sr.'s death, the eldest son was heir-at-law to all real estate. Matthew, said eldest son being dead, the heir-at-law rights fell to his eldest son, apparently Glover [Jr.], the South Carolina patriot. Glover [Jr.], being dead and without issue, the heir-at-law rights descended to his brother John. It was no wonder that Campbell instituted suit to get a clear title. More research needs to be done in Bedford and Franklin County records to clarify this state of affairs, but the framework is roughly evident. That's enough groundwork, let's look at where it all started. The reason that previous seachers have not found Glover's earliest land was because they were looking in the wrong county. Amherst County was erected out of Albemarle County in 1761. Glover's earliest land record was in "Albemarle County, VA, Surveyor's Plat Book 1, Part 1, p. 327," to wit: 30Mar1755 - John Staples, surveyor, platted 180 acres for Glover Davenport on Huff's Creek, adjoining Wheeler, Braxton, and Ambrose Porter. Huff's Creek is draught of Buffalo River of The James and is located today in east central Amherst County, draining the east slope of Tobacco Row Mountain and flowing southwest to northeast two or so miles from Amherst Court House (VDOT Road Map, 1997) The abounding Wheeler tract is of interest, for it was apparently the tract that most likely was the tract that Glover Davenport sold James Bush before 30Jul1766 (see above), to wit: 10Sep1755 - Virginia Patent: John Wheeler, 374 acres in Albemarle County, on Huff's Creek, adjoining John Graves. For L2. (Virginia Patents 31:606) Bush said the tract was 373 acres. The patent was for 374. This was the only patent in that neighborhood of that size, 1755-1765. The citation of John Graves as an adjoining landowner is seminal, for a John Graves, was the eldest son of Thomas Graves and Ann Davenport of North Anna waters, Spotsylvania County, (she a claimed daughter of Davis Davenport). Hence, John Graves of Thomas (of Spotsylvania), if our identification is correct, would have been a first cousin to Glover Davenport, presuming that he was a son of Martin of Hanover. We know that Thomas Graves of Spotsylvania had land in Albemarle, and we know that John Graves of Thomas ultimately settled in Granville County, North Carolina. Here's John's appearance on Huff Creek: 1Dec1748 - Patent: John Graves, 400 acres in Albemarle County on Huff's Creek, adjoining Benjamin Stennet. For L2. (Virginia Patents 27:12) Other early patents in the area demonstrate that some of the subsequent patentees were on the land five or more years before they perfected their titles by obtaining patents. To wit: 1Jun1750 - Patent: Benjamin Stennet, 400 acres in Albemarle County, near the Tobacco Row Mountain on north branches of Huff's Creek, near the top of a small mountain. For L2. (Virginia Patents 29:172) 1Jun1750 - Patent: James Stennet, 227 acres in Albemarle County, on branches of Huff's Creek, adjoining John Wheeler, John Graves, and Benjamin Stennet. For L1/5. (Virginia Patents 29:1770 Glover Davenport was obviously a latecomer to the area, with the choicest land had already been taken up. His securing of Wheeler's patented tract would have made good sense, for the patenting process was tedious and relatively expensive. Davenport obviously did not perfect his 180-acre survey into a patent, for no patent was forthcoming, and there was no mention of Glover Davenport as an adjoining landowner in subsequent surveys. (The fact that a given persons name was cited as a bounder on a survey was not evidence that the person still owned the land. Surveyors cited surveys, of which they generally had a file, did not keep up with changes in ownerships. John Graves, for example, appears to have sold out in 1751, but was still being cited as an adjoining landowner in 1756.) Analysis of early Albemarle land conveyances is needed to obtain a better definition of this situation. John Graves sold out and left Albemarle County in the early 1750s, to wit: 12-13Nov1751 - Lease & Release: John Graves to Thomas Sparks, both of Albemarle County, for L65 Virginia, 400 acres, adjoining Benjamin Stennet [rest of description all in survey measures]... /s/ John "X" Graves. Wit: None. Acknowledged by Graves in Albemarle Court on 13Nov1751. (Albemarle County, VA, Wills & Deeds 1:395) A month earlier a literate John Graves had sold other Albemarle land (apparently in now Fluvanna County), to wit: 10Oct1751 - Deed: John Graves, of Albemarle County, to William Gouge, of Hanover County, for L40, 350 acres in two parcels in Albemarle County, on the north side of James River, adjoining the Rock Ridge, John Morris, Paul Abney, William Randolph, Mountain Falls Creek, Charles Lynch, said Randolph... /s/ John Graves. Wit: John Morris, Francis "X" Graves, Mary "x" Morris, William Gooch, Jr. (Albemarle County, VA, Wills & Deeds 1:366) The illiterate John Graves was the one of Huff's Creek. Further analysis is required to establish whether he was a cousin to Glover Davenport. None of the other surnames associated with land in the area seemingly had prior Davenport associations. Whatever, it was from Huff Creek waters, near later Amherst Court House that Glover Davenport was settled c1755-c1766. This is only a partial tracking, but it is a beginning. John Scott Davenport (aka Jersey Doc)

Pamunkey Cousins: Here is the latest information from Jersey Doc. Nevada Jack -----Original Message----- From: JSDDOC@aol.com <JSDDOC@aol.com> To: nvjack@intercomm.com <nvjack@intercomm.com> Date: Monday, August 16, 1999 11:03 AM Subject: Earliest Glover Davenport Land Found in Albemarle Records >Pamunkey Davenports: > > Glover Davenport, first found in Louisa County (VA) Court Orders on >8Aug1743 when Matthew Jouett was ordered to pay him a one-day witness fee in >Jouett's suit against Richard Brooks, has long been a problem for Pamunkey >Davenport identification. By the mid-1760s he, in association variously with >sons Matthew and James, appeared in Amherst County Court records, and after >1769, he appeared in Bedford County, having moved south of The James. >Tracing him in land records heretofore has largely been unsuccessful beyond a >30Jul1766 mortgage in Amherst County wherein one James Bush described the >land he was mortgaging as "adjoining 373 acres that James Bush bought of >Glover Davenport and where John Berry lived." If anyone heretofore has >located that land, they have not shared the discovery. > > Largely because of proximity of the Davenport and Jouett families, >including the marriage of James Davenport, son of Martin of Hanover >(d.1735), to Frances Jouett, daughter of Matthew Jouett of Louisa County >(Louisa Courthouse was and is on his large land patent), Glover Davenport has >been tentatively identified as a son of Martin also, the identification being >circumstantially reinforced by the fact that additional Glover Davenports >appear among Martin's descendants--and nowhere else among the Virginia >Davenports. > > The fact that Glover Davenport's likely eldest son was named Matthew, the >only recorded Virginia Davenport possessing that given name prior to the >Revolution, suggests a relationship between Glover and Matthew Jouett of more >than casual acquaintance. Matthew of Glover died a young man c1767, leaving >two sons: Glover and John, both of whom apparently moved with their widowed >mother and her new husband to Rutherford County, NC, shortly before or during >the Revolution. Glover of Matthew, who did not survive the Revolution, >appears to have been the Glover Davenport cited among the South Carolina >Patriots. [Of all the Davenports in South Carolina during the Revolution, >only two, namely Glover and Francis Davenport (a Newberry), have been >certified as South Carolina Patriots]. > > The tracing of family lines relative to Glover [Sr.], his son Matthew, >his son Glover [Jr.], and Glover [Jr.]'s brother John is crucial to Glover, >Sr.'s identification, for Glover, Sr., appears to have died intestate c1785 >and without having perfected title to his 220-acre tract, which apparently >lay on Maggodee Creek, a draught of Staunton River, in that part of Bedford >County that went into Franklin County in 1785. A suit to clear the title to >the tract was brought in Franklin County Court by John Campbell in 1803 >against Glover Davenport and John Davenport, sons of Matthew Davenport, Decd. > Under Virginia law at the time of Glover, Sr.'s death, the eldest son was >heir-at-law to all real estate. Matthew, said eldest son being dead, the >heir-at-law rights fell to his eldest son, apparently Glover [Jr.], the South >Carolina patriot. Glover [Jr.], being dead and without issue, the >heir-at-law rights descended to his brother John. It was no wonder that >Campbell instituted suit to get a clear title. More research needs to be >done in Bedford and Franklin County records to clarify this state of affairs, >but the framework is roughly evident. > > That's enough groundwork, let's look at where it all started. The reason >that previous seachers have not found Glover's earliest land was because they >were looking in the wrong county. Amherst County was erected out of >Albemarle County in 1761. Glover's earliest land record was in "Albemarle >County, VA, Surveyor's Plat Book 1, Part 1, p. 327," to wit: > > 30Mar1755 - John Staples, surveyor, platted 180 acres for Glover >Davenport on Huff's Creek, adjoining Wheeler, Braxton, and Ambrose Porter. > > Huff's Creek is draught of Buffalo River of The James and is located >today in east central Amherst County, draining the east slope of Tobacco Row >Mountain and flowing southwest to northeast two or so miles from Amherst >Court House (VDOT Road Map, 1997) The abounding Wheeler tract is of >interest, for it was apparently the tract that most likely was the tract that >Glover Davenport sold James Bush before 30Jul1766 (see above), to wit: > > 10Sep1755 - Virginia Patent: John Wheeler, 374 acres in Albemarle County, >on Huff's Creek, adjoining John Graves. For L2. (Virginia Patents 31:606) > > Bush said the tract was 373 acres. The patent was for 374. This was the >only patent in that neighborhood of that size, 1755-1765. The citation of >John Graves as an adjoining landowner is seminal, for a John Graves, was the >eldest son of Thomas Graves and Ann Davenport of North Anna waters, >Spotsylvania County, (she a claimed daughter of Davis Davenport). Hence, John >Graves of Thomas (of Spotsylvania), if our identification is correct, would >have been a first cousin to Glover Davenport, presuming that he was a son of >Martin of Hanover. We know that Thomas Graves of Spotsylvania had land in >Albemarle, and we know that John Graves of Thomas ultimately settled in >Granville County, North Carolina. Here's John's appearance on Huff Creek: > > 1Dec1748 - Patent: John Graves, 400 acres in Albemarle County on Huff's >Creek, adjoining Benjamin Stennet. For L2. (Virginia Patents 27:12) > > Other early patents in the area demonstrate that some of the subsequent >patentees were on the land five or more years before they perfected their >titles by obtaining patents. To wit: > > 1Jun1750 - Patent: Benjamin Stennet, 400 acres in Albemarle County, near >the Tobacco Row Mountain on north branches of Huff's Creek, near the top of a >small mountain. For L2. (Virginia Patents 29:172) > > 1Jun1750 - Patent: James Stennet, 227 acres in Albemarle County, on >branches of Huff's Creek, adjoining John Wheeler, John Graves, and Benjamin >Stennet. For L1/5. (Virginia Patents 29:1770 > > Glover Davenport was obviously a latecomer to the area, with the choicest >land had already been taken up. His securing of Wheeler's patented tract >would have made good sense, for the patenting process was tedious and >relatively expensive. Davenport obviously did not perfect his 180-acre >survey into a patent, for no patent was forthcoming, and there was no mention >of Glover Davenport as an adjoining landowner in subsequent surveys. (The >fact that a given persons name was cited as a bounder on a survey was not >evidence that the person still owned the land. Surveyors cited surveys, of >which they generally had a file, did not keep up with changes in ownerships. >John Graves, for example, appears to have sold out in 1751, but was still >being cited as an adjoining landowner in 1756.) Analysis of early Albemarle >land conveyances is needed to obtain a better definition of this situation. > > John Graves sold out and left Albemarle County in the early 1750s, to wit: > > 12-13Nov1751 - Lease & Release: John Graves to Thomas Sparks, both of >Albemarle County, for L65 Virginia, 400 acres, adjoining Benjamin Stennet >[rest of description all in survey measures]... /s/ John "X" Graves. Wit: >None. Acknowledged by Graves in Albemarle Court on 13Nov1751. (Albemarle >County, VA, Wills & Deeds 1:395) > > A month earlier a literate John Graves had sold other Albemarle land >(apparently in now Fluvanna County), to wit: > > 10Oct1751 - Deed: John Graves, of Albemarle County, to William Gouge, of >Hanover County, for L40, 350 acres in two parcels in Albemarle County, on the >north side of James River, adjoining the Rock Ridge, John Morris, Paul Abney, >William Randolph, Mountain Falls Creek, Charles Lynch, said Randolph... /s/ >John Graves. Wit: John Morris, Francis "X" Graves, Mary "x" Morris, William >Gooch, Jr. (Albemarle County, VA, Wills & Deeds 1:366) > > The illiterate John Graves was the one of Huff's Creek. Further analysis >is required to establish whether he was a cousin to Glover Davenport. None >of the other surnames associated with land in the area seemingly had prior >Davenport associations. Whatever, it was from Huff Creek waters, near later >Amherst Court House that Glover Davenport was settled c1755-c1766. > > This is only a partial tracking, but it is a beginning. > > John Scott Davenport (aka Jersey Doc)

My mistake, I couldn't get in because I had one of the slashes going the wrong way. Sorry. I got in, and think the article is great. MargoBelle

Hello All, This page has a list of 3 Davenports who emmigrated to CA. There not mine but I thought someone may have an interest. <A HREF="http://feefhs.org/fbvca/1872d1.html">Click here: 1872 Foreign-Born Voters of California - Letter D (Part 1)</A> Philip Triebes Newberry Davenports

I tried this website, it tells me it's no longer in service.

This was posted on another list that I am one. I thought some of you might enjoy reading another interpretation of the rules for being on a genealogy mailing list. go to: http://www.angelfire.com/tx2/UncleHiram/lists.html It is a good one!! Angela Groenhout Pamunkey Davenport desc.

To Heather - Linda Haas forwarded your message to the group. I looked up Aileen Davenport, didn't find anything, but did find an Eileen whose maiden name, not married name, was Holbrook. This might possibly be your person: Anita Eileen Holbrook, Husband: Sam Vaughn Children: Kay Vaughn, Douglas Vaughn Anita Eileen's Father: Pleasant Holbrook, son of Hargis Holbrook and Fannie Stambaugh Anita Eileen's Mother: Rutha Skaggs, daughter of Lewis H. Skaggs and Nancy Lester Marriage Date: 1886 Marriage Place: Lawerence Co, Ky Children: Mary Esta Holbrook, Opal Holbrook, Anita Eileen Holbrook The person who furnished this information is at the E-mail address: carlos30@primary.net If this is the right person, I have more information on Pleasant Holbrook that I can send you, his line is well documented through the D.A.R. Also, a Sam Vaughn died in Zanesville, Ohio in 1963. If this is the right one, I will send that information also. It's interesting that there is a Fannie Stambaugh in this line, my husband's family name is Stambaugh. MargoBelle

Can anyone help Heather? She's not a subscriber so please reply to her. Linda Home Page: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~haas/ Marion Co AR: http://www.rootsweb.com/~armarion/ Washington Co NC, Haas & Hass e-mail list manager -----Original Message----- From: Les Ventes Bergeron Sales Inc. <Bergeron@vegacom.on.ca> To: Linda Haas <lhaasdav@mindspring.com> Date: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 8:49 PM Subject: Aileen Davenport Hi Linda, I was told to contact you because you have a lot of information on the Davenport line. I am looking for information on Aileen Davenport. Her estimated Date of Birth was 1908. I know she lived in Cleveland Ohio for a while, she may have been born there but I'm not sure. She was a Ziegfeld Follies girl and imitated Charlie Chaplin. I heard once her mother may have been an opera singer. Her marriage to a Holbrook resulted in three children one of which is my mother. Unfortunately, this is all the information I have gotton over the years. If any of this information rings a bell, please contact me. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely...Heather

Linda , I picked up an "address" from your e-mail of (I think) 8/6. Now every time I try to go back to it, I find "The page cannot be displayed" message. I had deleted your original message,could you put the address on again? As I had it, it was: www.ancestry.com/home/source/srcindex Do I have something wrong? Thanks, Mary Lou Garland ----- Original Message ----- From: Linda Haas Davenport <lhaasdav@mindspring.com> To: <DAVENPORT-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 1999 3:18 PM Subject: [DAVENPORT-L] Where to Write for Land Records > I have updated the information on where to write for Land Warrant / Patent > information. Select Where to Write for Land Patent Information at > http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~haas/learningcenter.html > > > Linda > Home Page: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~haas/ > Marion Co AR: http://www.rootsweb.com/~armarion/ > Washington Co NC, Haas & Hass e-mail list manager > > > > ==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== > Concerned about computer viruses, cookies, copyright, spam? > See Internet Stuff You Need To Know at > http://www.cyndislist.com/internet.htm > > ============================== > Share your family tree with loved ones through a FREE private website at > MyFamily.com! > Get started today at http://www.myfamily.com/banner.asp?ID=RWText1 > >

Hi Sandy: No I'm sorry my Davenports were in NC from about 1730 and didn't begin to scatter until this current generation. Linda Home Page: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~haas/ Marion Co AR: http://www.rootsweb.com/~armarion/ Washington Co NC, Haas & Hass e-mail list manager -----Original Message----- From: Potsiegb@aol.com <Potsiegb@aol.com> To: DAVENPORT-L@rootsweb.com <DAVENPORT-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Saturday, August 07, 1999 9:21 PM Subject: Re: [DAVENPORT-L] Davenport / Washington CO NC Deed Index >Hi Linda, >You didn't come across any info. on the Davenport family of Pa. did you? I >know you mentioned the deed index in Washington. I am looking for any info. >on the Davenport family of Luzerne County, Pa. Let me know. >Thanks, >Sandy >Davenport, Frick, Frace, Hicks, Varner, Andreas, Washburn > > >==== DAVENPORT Mailing List ==== >Visit our Genealogy Page at >http://users.intercomm.com/nvjack/davnport/davnport.htm > >============================== >Search more than 274 MILLION NAMES and find your ancestors at Ancestry.com! >Get started today at http://www.ancestry.com/rootswebtext.asp >