Jack, The profession of this 1672 John RUSSELL was listed as being a doctor, not a domestic. I also wonder if that Joane YOUNGE listed in Pam's transcription of this document is really John YOUNG. I do not remember ever reading where they gave land grants if someone imported a lady and Joane is definitely a ladies name. The William COCKE also listed on this document as one of these 1672 "importees" also makes me think this boy was also not a domestic because the COCKES were one of the First Families of VA. I tend to think they all were either children, cousins or unrelated persons of the same name as those of already existing VA families who Capt. Bill brought over to the colonies in 1672. As I remember, they only gave land grants for people whose migration would benefit the colony, one way or another, in a professional sense. John R. Clarke Thomasville, GA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack V Butler" <JackVButler@comcast.net> To: <DANIEL-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:39 AM Subject: Re: [DANIEL-L] John Russell imported by Wm. Daniell > Yep, and I found a boy named John Russell on a list of persons arriving the > James and the Revenge in 1632. This same boy appears on the list of > "general accompts" as a kitchen servant "imloyed in the kitchen to beate the > corne". And there was another John Russell listed as a passenger on the > Africa in 1636. > > There were undoubtedly multiple John Russells, but as Ken pointed out, it > was routine to find the same person listed on several different grants - > sometimes the same list of people would appear on grants in different > counties. > > Jack > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <daniellk@bellsouth.net> > To: <DANIEL-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:46 AM > Subject: Re: [DANIEL-L] John Russell imported by Wm. Daniell > > > > I checked the volumes cited by Kevin. While William Daniell's 1672 patent > > was based on a headright for the transport of 3 persons, including John > > Russell, that record, by itself, does not establish that William Daniell > personally transported Russell. Headright patents can be the source of > considerable misinterpretation. The person who actually transported a group > > of individuals could sell or trade the associated entitlement to acres to > > others to settle a debt or convert it to cash. The headrights served as > a form > > of quasi-currency and could change hands multiple times over a period of > years. > > Consider the fact that the Nugent Vol. II also contains a reference to a > patent > > a few months after the one in 1672, which was to Mr. Tho. Hall and Jno. > Pigg > > based on the transport of 77 persons including John Russell, William > Daniell, > > and Mary Daniell [p. 143]. Then, three years later Lieut. Col. Cad. Jones > & > > Mr. David Jones received a patent based on the transport of 282 persons, > > including John Russell and William Daniell, but not Mary Daniell [Nugent, > p. 191]. There are an additional six patents based on the transport of an > > individual named John Russell prior to 1672 and another four after 1672 > (one as > > late as 1694), none with William Daniell. In Cavaliers & Pioneers Vol. I, > there > > are another five patents based on transport of an individual named John > Russell. > > One of those was as early as 1635, and another, in 1653, which granted > Col. > > William Clayborne acreage based on the the transport of 100 persons, > including > > John Russell and Joane Younge (remember that was one of the two other > names in > > the William Daniell patent of 1672). In this single volume there are no > less > > than 13 patents issued over a 28 year period based on the transport of two > or > > more individuals named John Russell (one was a Junior). It would take > careful > > study and analysis of these references to begin to accurately sort out > them out. > > > > To further complicate matters, in Adventurers of Purse & Person > 1607-1624/5, by > > Virginia M. Meyer and John Frederick Dorman, p. 31, there is even > reference to > > a John Russell in James City, VA on 24 January 1624. This John Russell, > one of > > the servants of Mr. Edward Blaney, was age 19 at the time and had come to > Virginia in the Bona Nova. > > > > Ken > > > > > > From: "P. A. Miller" <gen@pamiller.net> > > > Date: 2003/12/01 Mon PM 10:46:20 EST > > > To: DANIEL-L@rootsweb.com > > > Subject: [DANIEL-L] John Russell imported by Wm. Daniell > > > > > > Hi, folks, > > > > > > Kevin W. Q. Daniel wrote: > > > > > > > Does anyone on the list have access to these books to see if one of > > > > these John Russell's was imported by William Daniel? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, below is my transcription of the original patent (available at > > > http://lvaimage.lib.va.us). The bounding words Smyth, Indian Bridge, > the red > > > and white oaks, and Potter are in later grants and deeds bounding next > to land > > > of _Capt._ William Daniell. I can't remember if or how a > Russell/Daniell > > > relationship got started in this thread (what can I tell you, I can only > lurk at > > > the speed of light right now), but I've extracted all the Daniel entries > from > > > and there is no mention of a Russell dealing with a Daniell in Hopkins' > > > _Middlesex County, Virginia Wills and Inventories 1673-1812 and Other > Court > > > Papers_, nor in the Christ Church Parish Registers. > > > > > > Virginia Land Office, Land Grants and Patents, Pat Bk 6, P 415. " To all > & c. > > > Whereas & c. Now know yee that I the said Sr. Wm. Berkeley & c. do give > and > > > Grant unto Wm. Daniell one hundred & fifteen acres of land situated in > Middlesex > > > Co. by the Indian bridge branch dividing this land and the land of Alex > Murray > > > beginning at a marked white oak standing by the side of the Indian > bridge branch > > > opposite to the corner poplar of Alex Murray and in the line of Mr. > Alexander > > > Smyth and running along the sd Smyth's line So. E. by E. 156 poles to a > corner > > > red oak of the said Smyth thence So. So. W. to the rim of the green > swamp als. > > > Dragon Swamp, thence up the runn of the sd. swamp to the mouth of the > Indian > > > bridge branch and up the runn of the sd. branch to the first mentioned > tree, wch > > > sd 115 acres of land is part of the 190 acres granted unto Lieut. > Colonell > > > Cutbert Potter by order of the generall Court bearing date the 21th. day > of Apr > > > 1668 and by the sd. Potter sould and assigned to the sd. Daniell and is > now due > > > unto the sd Daniell by and for the transportation of three persons into > this > > > Colony whose names are mentioned on the Record under this Patt. To have > and to > > > hold &c. To be held &c. Yeilding & Paying &c Provided &c. Dated the > fiveth of > > > Oct 1672. Anne Rs. Car. 2d. 24 John Russell - Wm Cocke - Joane Younge [= > the > > > three persons he imported which entitled him to the land grant]." > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Pam in CA > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== DANIEL Mailing List ==== > > > Going on Vacation for longer than 5 days? Please unsubscribe > > > Click on the following link and your message is ready to send > > > Mail Mode: > > > mailto:DANIEL-L-request@rootsweb.com?subject=unsubscribe > > > or- > > > Digest Mode: > > > mailto:DANIEL-D-request@rootsweb.com?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== DANIEL Mailing List ==== > > IF YOU MISS ANY MESSAGE: You can easily search the DANIEL List Archives > at: > > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=DANIEL > > > > > ==== DANIEL Mailing List ==== > Going on Vacation for longer than 5 days? Please unsubscribe > Click on the following link and your message is ready to send > Mail Mode: > mailto:DANIEL-L-request@rootsweb.com?subject=unsubscribe > or- > Digest Mode: > mailto:DANIEL-D-request@rootsweb.com?subject=unsubscribe >