In a message dated 4/14/2004 5:02:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, jclarke@rose.net writes: Hillary CASON, Sr. was married to Sarah Barrow ORMAND, d/o Wyriott ORMAND and Penelope BARROW, according to my information John, The 9 Mar 1773 Beaufort Co. will of Wyriott ORMOND names wife Elizabeth Penelope and daughters Nancy & Sarah ORMOND. Your post lists several CASON children born to Hilary & Sarah ORMOND before the will date. Seems unusual that ORMOND would refer to Sarah by her maiden name rather than CASON. Were there two Sarahs or did brother Roger have a daughter Sarah? Mike

Mike, I see wills all the time where girls are listed in the wills of their parents by their maiden names or just listed as my daughters, Sarah, Jane, Martha, etc. I see nothing unusual in this. This will could have also been written some years before they were actually married and never updated. One of the chillen of Hillary CASON, Sr. and Sarah Barrow ORMAND was Wyriott CASON, her father's given name. I would assume there were some deeds between Sarah and one or more of her parents which should help clear up this assignment. John R. Clarke Thomasville, GA ----- Original Message ----- From: <Runforf471@aol.com> To: <DANIEL-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 1:00 PM Subject: Re: [DANIEL-L] Hillary CASON > In a message dated 4/14/2004 5:02:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > jclarke@rose.net writes: > Hillary CASON, Sr. was married to Sarah Barrow ORMAND, d/o Wyriott > ORMAND and Penelope BARROW, according to my information > John, > > The 9 Mar 1773 Beaufort Co. will of Wyriott ORMOND names wife Elizabeth > Penelope and daughters Nancy & Sarah ORMOND. Your post lists several > CASON > children born to Hilary & Sarah ORMOND before the will date. Seems > unusual that > ORMOND would refer to Sarah by her maiden name rather than CASON. Were > there two > Sarahs or did brother Roger have a daughter Sarah? > > Mike > > > ==== DANIEL Mailing List ==== > DO NOT FORGET: This is a Genealogical Mailing List and the posting of > messages that do not relate to the DANIEL Family, its collateral families > or those of a historical nature relating to genealogical research -- are > not allowed on this list. > >