In a message dated 04/03/1999 3:29:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, solutions@kahala.net writes: << 'm having some problems with the internal consistency of the data at the site referenced. Checking Daniel Hubbard b. 1645 m. Mary Clark, his parents are shown as George Hubbard Jr. and Elizabeth Watts. George Jr. parents are shown as George Sr. and Mary Bishop. However, checking the back up information by clicking the links provided shows Daniel as the son of George Sr. and Mary Bishop. Any help or clarification? Thanks. "Devlin, Jane" wrote: > > Anyone looking for Hubbards in the Haddam area should check out > this web site: Geoff Wilkie's Hubbard Genealogy: > > http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Trails/9971/Hubbard/index.html >> Simple solution. The information is wrong. George HUBBARD and Elizabeth WATTS are the orignial HUBBARDS in this line. The Hubbard Association cannot go back further. There was an error put in a long time ago with a George HUBBARD and Mary BISHOP. This is another line and it was just a nice way of connect the two, but was never proven. To make matters worse, someone decided to put a Jr. and a Sr. after their names. This is new to me, but the attempt at connecting the two HUBBARD lines is old. You have to be careful what you accept. I know how hard it can be, espically since the BISHOP line is a pretty good one. Dave from Long Island