Thanks for the clarification on Daniel Hubbard's parentage. I do, however, have another Hubbard connection in my line. Possible to connect these folks with other Hubbard's? (Capitals are my direct line) Thanks. Descendants of Samuel HUBBARD 1 Samuel HUBBARD 1610 - 1688 . +Tasy Tacy COOPER 1608/09 - 1687 ........ 2 Ruth HUBBARD 1639/40 - 1691 ............ +Robert BURDICK 1630 - 1692 ........ 2 Bethia Hubbard 1646 - 1707 ............ +Joseph Clarke 1641/42 - 1725/26 DMS59Dart@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 04/03/1999 3:29:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, > solutions@kahala.net writes: > > << 'm having some problems with the internal consistency of the data at > the site referenced. Checking Daniel Hubbard b. 1645 m. Mary Clark, his > parents are shown as George Hubbard Jr. and Elizabeth Watts. George Jr. > parents are shown as George Sr. and Mary Bishop. However, checking the > back up information by clicking the links provided shows Daniel as the > son of George Sr. and Mary Bishop. Any help or clarification? Thanks. > > "Devlin, Jane" wrote: > > > > Anyone looking for Hubbards in the Haddam area should check out > > this web site: Geoff Wilkie's Hubbard Genealogy: > > > > http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Trails/9971/Hubbard/index.html > >> > Simple solution. The information is wrong. George HUBBARD and Elizabeth > WATTS are the orignial HUBBARDS in this line. The Hubbard Association cannot > go back further. There was an error put in a long time ago with a George > HUBBARD and Mary BISHOP. This is another line and it was just a nice way of > connect the two, but was never proven. To make matters worse, someone > decided to put a Jr. and a Sr. after their names. This is new to me, but the > attempt at connecting the two HUBBARD lines is old. You have to be careful > what you accept. I know how hard it can be, espically since the BISHOP line > is a pretty good one. > Dave from Long Island -- Michael C. Owens Solutions Enterprises, Inc. http://www.kahala.net/~solutions/sol/