In a message dated 10/1/00 6:27:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time, gencon@harborside.com writes: << Now in Ernest FLAGG'S "Genealogical Notes of the Founding of New England" pg 361 under "ANDREWS-PECK" he says this: "There are good reasons for believing that Daniel 2) ANDREWS married Mary 2) PECK. the only reason for thinking otherwise is the fact that Savage says she married John ANDREWS of Hartford. The PECK Genealogy make the same statement, but in doing so, simply copies Savage without quetion, as so many others have done. It can be shown that Savis is "elaborately wrong" to use one of his own expressions, as regards the family of Deacon Paul PECK." Ernest FLAGG goes on to point out some of the errors in Savage and then showing what we now know..he takes up 3 pages on the subject and pointing out that Mary did marry Daniel ANDREWS the s/o John 1) ANDREWS and Mary [BARNS]. If I am in error, I sure want to correct it... but that is what Ernest FLAGG points out.. Wilma Fleming Haynes >> Hi Wilma , et al , I now have copies of those pages , And Ernest does make a compelling argument for the marriage of Daniel and Mary !!! , I will enter it in to my ' tree ' as such and source it to Mr Flagg , And will change the dates of birth for Paul `s children to what Flagg has them at , Phil