In a message dated 12/05/2000 2:39:11 AM Eastern Standard Time, WebMerlin@Megsinet.net writes: > Subj: Re: [CRV] Nathan Hale Picture > Date: 12/05/2000 2:39:11 AM Eastern Standard Time > From: WebMerlin@Megsinet.net (Warren Wetmore) > Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:CT-RIVER-VALLEY-L@rootsweb.com">CT-RIVER-VALLEY-L@rootsweb.com</A> > To: CT-RIVER-VALLEY-L@rootsweb.com > > > > > Probably there is no contemporary portrait of Hale. All I've seen is > statues -- and who knows what liberties the sculptors took. > > Yrs aye, > > Warren Wetmore > > > I have, since my post, found this to be absolutly true. Thanks for the help. Dave (LI)

----- Original Message ----- From: <DMS59Dart@aol.com> To: <CT-RIVER-VALLEY-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 4:18 PM Subject: Re: [CRV] Nathan Hale Picture > In a message dated 12/05/2000 2:39:11 AM Eastern Standard Time, > WebMerlin@Megsinet.net writes: > > > > Subj: Re: [CRV] Nathan Hale Picture > > Date: 12/05/2000 2:39:11 AM Eastern Standard Time > > From: WebMerlin@Megsinet.net (Warren Wetmore) > > Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:CT-RIVER-VALLEY-L@rootsweb.com">CT-RIVER-VALLEY-L@rootsweb.com< /A> > > To: CT-RIVER-VALLEY-L@rootsweb.com > > > > > > > > > > Probably there is no contemporary portrait of Hale. All I've seen is > > statues -- and who knows what liberties the sculptors took. > > > > Yrs aye, > > > > Warren Wetmore > > > > > > > > I have, since my post, found this to be absolutly true. Thanks for the help. > Dave (LI) My pleasure. Best, Warren