----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Crumly" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 8:24 AM Subject: [CRUMLEY] cousins > > The way that we always calculated the cousins it is correct that they > were > > 2nd cousins, > > They'd have to be the same generation to be 2nd cousins. > > >but if you look on the chart in the FTM it shows them as 1st > > cousins once removed. > > Different generations, right? Yes, Jane was 4th generation from James and Catherine Gilkey and John was 5th generation