In a message dated 3/17/2002 9:25:32 PM Central Standard Time, JPIPICH@aol.com writes: > have a distant cousin-in-law who used someone else's name, so his > > record will never be found. i wonder how he applied for naturalization? > > > > > > My father-in-law used someone else's name when he came to US, but when he > was > naturalized he had to admit to that and it gave the person's name he used > on > his naturalization papers. > > Joan > Also keep in mind not everyone was naturalized. Chuck

on 3/17/02 9:31 PM, CMSWI04@aol.com at CMSWI04@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 3/17/2002 9:25:32 PM Central Standard Time, > JPIPICH@aol.com writes: > > >> have a distant cousin-in-law who used someone else's name, so his >>> record will never be found. i wonder how he applied for naturalization? >>> >>> >> >> My father-in-law used someone else's name when he came to US, but when he >> was >> naturalized he had to admit to that and it gave the person's name he used >> on >> his naturalization papers. >> >> Joan >> > > Also keep in mind not everyone was naturalized. > Chuck But would it be possible to use someone else's name for a child too? Mary

oh! well, i don'y know about that. this relative came over first before his family. i wonder why people would use someone else's name? Mary Hegarty wrote: > on 3/17/02 9:31 PM, CMSWI04@aol.com at CMSWI04@aol.com wrote: > > > In a message dated 3/17/2002 9:25:32 PM Central Standard Time, > > JPIPICH@aol.com writes: > > > > > >> have a distant cousin-in-law who used someone else's name, so his > >>> record will never be found. i wonder how he applied for naturalization? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> My father-in-law used someone else's name when he came to US, but when he > >> was > >> naturalized he had to admit to that and it gave the person's name he used > >> on > >> his naturalization papers. > >> > >> Joan > >> > > > > Also keep in mind not everyone was naturalized. > > Chuck > But would it be possible to use someone else's name for a child too? > Mary