Pat & Brenda, Please don't worry about shooting my theories down - that's why I floated them! Here's why I made my assumptions. I'd be interested in your thoughts on these items: (1) The American Encyclopedia of Quaker Genealogy (Hinshaw), under the Henrico Monthly Meeting notes, shows a "John and Sarah Crews" having five children: James (b. 25 Nov 1750), Judith (b. 13 Nov 1752, Jacob (b. 11 Jun 1754, d. 4 Sep 1810), John (b. 1 Jul 1758, d. 12 Oct 1807), and Joseph (b. 18 Mar 1771). If this John is not the son of Joseph, then who is this John? (2) The same book shows a "John Crews, son of Joseph", being "disowned" (and not married) on 1 Feb 1755, for marrying out of union. At the very next meeting (1 Mar 1755), a "Sarah Crews" was also "disowned" (for marrying her first cousin), but her parents were cleared of consenting to the marriage. John Crews, son of Joseph, and Sarah Crews, son of Andrew, would have been first cousins! Is it possible that they could have been married outside the church, and for whatever reason, not have been disowned for several years? (3) As you pointed out, Sarah Crews may have been married to Thomas Stanley III (and he, too, would have been her first cousin). However, I found a web page (http://netdirect.net/~damonf/stanley/stanleyn.htm) that claims this Thomas married Sarah Crews, "daughter of John" (and not Andrew) on or about 12 April 1755. Is this a mistake? Thanks for your help! Dan