-----Original Message----- From: Chris Covey <chri616@ibm.net> To: Chris Covey <chri616@ibm.net>; QC-ETANGLO-L@rootsweb.com <QC-ETANGLO-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 11:46 PM Subject: Re: [QC-ETANGLO-L] Fw: Covey Family info: >More errors! I can see that I am not going to be good at this. >I will corect this and then go away and sulk. > >Same question though. >Is Ebenezer Covy a missing son of Samuel Covey? > >Should be: >In the 1800 Vermont Census >>Samuel is listed with a household of 16 comprising of: >>Himself being over 45 years of age >>His wife (presumably again) being between the age of 26 and 45 >>2 other males 16 to 26 *******(was 10 to 16)******** >>3 other males 10 to 16 *******(was 16 to 26)******** >>4 other males under 10 years of age >>2 other females 10 to 16 >>3 other females under 10 years of age >>The 2 other "over 16 males" (Samuel Jr & ?????) from the 1790 census are >*******(was was not)****** >>counted in 1800 census also. >>The Nathan Covey family of Bristol is not listed in 1800 >******* corrected Joseph Covey information*********** >>But there are Covey families in the southern part of the state >>Joseph Covey of Johnson's Gore County of Windham with a family of 11 >(listed 1790 as Coovey) >>including 3 males 10-26 years of age. >>Joseph Covey of Windham County of Windham single 16-26 >> No Ebenezer son of Joseph there. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Chris Covey <chri616@ibm.net> >To: QC-ETANGLO-L@rootsweb.com <QC-ETANGLO-L@rootsweb.com> >Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 7:29 PM >Subject: [QC-ETANGLO-L] Fw: Covey Family info: > > >> >> >> >>Samuel Covey is listed, in the 1790 US Census of Vermont, as living in >>Alburg >>with a household of: >>Himself being over 16 years of age. >>His wife (presumably, wives were counted in the 'any female' category) >>Two other males over 16 years of age >>Two other females >> >>The only other Covey in the state was Nathan Covey (2 2 2 .) of Bristol >>which is 80-90 miles from Alburg >> >>In the 1800 Vermont Census >>Samuel is listed with a household of 16 comprising of: >>Himself being over 45 years of age >>His wife (presumably again) being between the age of 26 and 45 >>2 other males 10 to 16 >>3 other males 16 to 26 >>4 other males under 10 years of age >>2 other females 10 to 16 >>3 other females under 10 years of age >>The 2 other "over 16 males" (Samuel Jr & ?????) from the 1790 census are >>not counted in 1800 >>The Nathan Covey family of Bristol is not listed in 1800 >>But there is a new Covey family in the northern part of the state >>Joseph Covey of Johnson's Gore County of Franklin with a family of 11 >>including 3 males 10-26 years of age. >> >>In the 1810 Vermont Census (index only) >>Samuel is listed with a household in Alburg >>Samuel Jr. is also listed with a household in Alburg >>(I haven't found any local microfiche for 1810 so it is 'Head of household' >>only at this point) >>There is also a Ebenezer Covy as head of household in Crosburg Franklin >>County. >> >>My question is this. Is Ebenezer Covy a missing son of Samuel Covey? Is he >>the other over 16 male in the 1790 census? Or is he from the Joseph Covey >>family of Johnson's Gore? >> >>Grand Isle is adjacent to Franklin County. Neither Johnson's Gore or >>Crosburg exist today. Johnson's Gore is not Johnson in Lamoile county. >>Ebenezer is not listed in 1830. I don't know about 1820. >> >>Any Info ????? >> >> >> >