Thanks, Arthur. It doesn't help me at the moment, but after I finsh the records, I will dig into what I might have tucked away that I don't know I have. I have never bothered to work on the Baggot line until all these connections popped up in the mid-1800's. Janet On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Arthur Carden <carden@one-name.org> wrote: > Hi, Janet > > Here is a quote from my book CARDEN OF BARNANE. > > At about this time [1698] Jonathan Carden married Bridget Bagot. Eliza > Jones, Jonathan's great grand-daughter, wrote that Jonathan lost the > Templemore property on being disinherited for marrying a Papist, a Mistress > Bagot, who was nearly descended from Charles II, adding, "the old people in > the lands of Barnane used to say that my father was but three removes from > Charley. There was old plate at Barnane which had . . . the Stuart arms upon > it, and I have an old seal (crystal) with her arms on one side and the > Carden arms on the other. Sir Lionel Carden wrote a monograph on this > subject which can be seen at the library of the Society of Genealogists in > London. This is the only evidence that her maiden name was indeed Bagot. > Possibly she was a descendant of members of the Bagot family who emigrated > to Ireland in the 17th century, of whom Eleanor Bagot married Robert > Cawarden of Mavesyn Ridware about 1500. Their only son John was born on 11 > May 1699. > > Does any of this ring a bell with anyone? If so, I would love to hear from > them. > > Arthur Carden of Horsham, England. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Janet Crawford" <reojan@gmail.com> > To: <cotipperary@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:30 PM > Subject: [COTIPPERARY] Baggot family > > >> Is anyone researching the Catholic branches of the Baggot family? I >> have 3 different connections into it and have questions. >> >> Janet > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to COTIPPERARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >