Hello, I am new to the list.  We are researching the Kendall families in Cornwall and how the may be related to several Kendall families who migrated to the United States.  Many American Kendall families claim descent from teh Cornwall family but few have been able to prove it. For these reasons we are conducting a Kendall DNA Project.  To learn more about the project and to share Kendall genealogy, you may contact me directly at ScottDKendall@gmail.com. Thank you Scott Kendall

Joy, James and Mary Johns have a son George Vincent so I'm sure the marriage to Mary Jenkin must be right Thanks Connie Hi Connie,   There are two possible marriages at Wendron (both on https://familysearch.org/: 05 Jun 1847 James JOHNS and Mary JENKIN, groom's father's name Vincent,  bride's father's name Joseph 02 Mar 1848 James JOHNS amd Mary WEEKS, groom's father's name John, bride's father's name William   In the 1841 census the James son of Vincent who married Mary JENKIN is living at Carnkye, Carnmenellis and that is the address of your James and Mary in 1851 so I am leaning towards them but the only way to be sure is to obtain Thomas's birth certificate which will give his mother's maiden name.   Regards,   Joy ________________________________ From: Connie Saunders <dccows@comcast.net> To: cornish@rootsweb.com Sent: Tuesday, 15 May 2012, 23:35 Subject: [CORNISH] Johns family of Wendron Is anyone on the list working on James Johns born about 1822 Wendron and family. He married Mary? I have them on the 1851-61-71 census with a large famey of  11 children.  There oldest son Thomas is the direct line. Connie in hot Utah ------------------------------- Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text.  If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Joy, Thanks so much for the info. Connie Not my family, Connie but this is possibly Mary Ann: Marianne REED baptised Wendron 25 Dec 1822, parents Richard and Margaret http://www.cornwall-opc-database.org/search-database/more-info/?t=baptisms&i d=1423116   Familysearch has a marriage at Wendron 05 Oct 1820: Richard REEDand Margaret REED.  Here is a scan of the original image: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-12875-54359-83?cc=1769414&wc=MM VH-K4T:n1106040559 Witnesses at the marriage were Sheba REED and Richard REED. The date is right for this baptism to be Margaret and it fits with Sheba Reed being a witness at the wedding: 06 Jun 1791 Wendron Margaret dau of Sheba and Ann REED   Marriage Wendron 14 Mar 1785 Sheba REED and Ann WILLIAMS   There are many baptisms at Wendron of Richard REED but none match the age on the 1851 and 1861 census but the 1861 census has Richard's birthplace as Mawnan and his age as 67 which makes this Baptism a candidate: 12 May 1793 Mawnan Richard REED son of Thomas REED and Sarah   Marriage Mawnan 21 May 1780 Thomas REED and Sarah HARRIS.   Regards,   Joy   ________________________________ From: Connie Saunders <dccows@comcast.net> To: cornish@rootsweb.com Sent: Tuesday, 15 May 2012, 23:45 Subject: [CORNISH] Mary Ann Reed family List, Anyone researching Richard Reed and Margaret's family? Their daughter Mary A born about 1824 Wendron married Hercules Prisk 1845 Wendron. I have Richard and Margaret on the 1841 census with their children Mary A and Thomas. I have a lot on the Prisk family but can't do anything with the Reed family. Connie in Utah ------------------------------- Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text.  If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Connie,   There are two possible marriages at Wendron (both on https://familysearch.org/: 05 Jun 1847 James JOHNS and Mary JENKIN, groom's father's name Vincent,  bride's father's name Joseph 02 Mar 1848 James JOHNS amd Mary WEEKS, groom's father's name John, bride's father's name William   In the 1841 census the James son of Vincent who married Mary JENKIN is living at Carnkye, Carnmenellis and that is the address of your James and Mary in 1851 so I am leaning towards them but the only way to be sure is to obtain Thomas's birth certificate which will give his mother's maiden name.   Regards,   Joy ________________________________ From: Connie Saunders <dccows@comcast.net> To: cornish@rootsweb.com Sent: Tuesday, 15 May 2012, 23:35 Subject: [CORNISH] Johns family of Wendron Is anyone on the list working on James Johns born about 1822 Wendron and family. He married Mary? I have them on the 1851-61-71 census with a large famey of  11 children.  There oldest son Thomas is the direct line. Connie in hot Utah ------------------------------- Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text.  If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Not my family, Connie but this is possibly Mary Ann: Marianne REED baptised Wendron 25 Dec 1822, parents Richard and Margaret http://www.cornwall-opc-database.org/search-database/more-info/?t=baptisms&id=1423116   Familysearch has a marriage at Wendron 05 Oct 1820: Richard REEDand Margaret REED.  Here is a scan of the original image: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-12875-54359-83?cc=1769414&wc=MMVH-K4T:n1106040559 Witnesses at the marriage were Sheba REED and Richard REED. The date is right for this baptism to be Margaret and it fits with Sheba Reed being a witness at the wedding: 06 Jun 1791 Wendron Margaret dau of Sheba and Ann REED   Marriage Wendron 14 Mar 1785 Sheba REED and Ann WILLIAMS   There are many baptisms at Wendron of Richard REED but none match the age on the 1851 and 1861 census but the 1861 census has Richard's birthplace as Mawnan and his age as 67 which makes this Baptism a candidate: 12 May 1793 Mawnan Richard REED son of Thomas REED and Sarah   Marriage Mawnan 21 May 1780 Thomas REED and Sarah HARRIS.   Regards,   Joy   ________________________________ From: Connie Saunders <dccows@comcast.net> To: cornish@rootsweb.com Sent: Tuesday, 15 May 2012, 23:45 Subject: [CORNISH] Mary Ann Reed family List, Anyone researching Richard Reed and Margaret's family? Their daughter Mary A born about 1824 Wendron married Hercules Prisk 1845 Wendron. I have Richard and Margaret on the 1841 census with their children Mary A and Thomas. I have a lot on the Prisk family but can't do anything with the Reed family. Connie in Utah ------------------------------- Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text.  If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

List, Anyone researching Richard Reed and Margaret's family? Their daughter Mary A born about 1824 Wendron married Hercules Prisk 1845 Wendron. I have Richard and Margaret on the 1841 census with their children Mary A and Thomas. I have a lot on the Prisk family but can't do anything with the Reed family. Connie in Utah

Is anyone on the list working on James Johns born about 1822 Wendron and family. He married Mary? I have them on the 1851-61-71 census with a large famey of 11 children. There oldest son Thomas is the direct line. Connie in hot Utah

There was a Camborne girl called Julie Who was known to think long and think poorly She got lost in her thoughts Scored nothing but noughts And was last seen somewhere near Cawley. .

Hmm! I'll have to think about that!! -----Original Message----- From: cornish-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:cornish-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Viv Martin Sent: Tuesday, 15 May 2012 3:21 PM To: cornish@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [CORNISH] Cornish Cultural Celebration (Would love to meet up with some of you) ...... and the rest of us ??? . ------------------------------- Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2171 / Virus Database: 2425/4999 - Release Date: 05/14/12

(Would love to meet up with some of you) ...... and the rest of us ??? .

Hi everyone, The Cornish Cultural Celebration will be held 26th-28th October in the Shoalhaven, NSW, Australia The website can be accessed through the link below or from the Southern Sons of Cornwall website http://freepages.misc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~jwheeler/ http://tinyurl.com/7n8exxz Would love to meet up with some of you Cheers Julie Originally from Camborne, Cornwall Now in NSW, Australia

There is an interesting case that's not been addressed yet, and the murder trial. The main addition to what you've already read abput the murder is the list of jurors. Otherwise, it's much the same. My abbreviated sections are enclosed by brackets; the parenthesis are as shown in the paper. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WEST BRITON AND CORNWALL ADVERTISER 28 MARCH 1855 - Assizes, part four of four WILFUL MURDER, AND SENTENCE OF DEATH [shortened somewhat, as the case was reported last week in quite a bit of detail. This report seems to be 'trimmed' by the reporter as well, probably for the same reason.] HANS HANSEN, late a soldier in the German Legion, was indicted for the wilful murder of CHARLES JACOBI, a soldier in the same Legion. The prisoner is thirty-four years of age, and was stated on the calendar to be by trade a stocking weaver. When placed at the bar, and indeed throughout the day, he did not appear to exhibit anything like nervous feeling, though on some occasions, when the witnesses were giving evidence, he seemed to display more than usual anxiety. [The prisoner] Being a Dane, and not understanding the English language, but having a knowledge of German, an interpreter was sworn to truly interpret and explain the evidence. The interpreter was Captain CARSTENSTEIN, of the 3rd JAGER (Rifle) Regiment, to which the prisoner belonged. The Counsel for the prisoner (assigned to defend him by the learned Judge) was Mr. STOCK. The following were the jury sworn in the case: WILLIAM TEAGUE, foreman, Peter KNUCKEY, William RAPSON, George STENLAKE, William MEDLYN, Richard RICH, Elijah EDE, Thomas MORCOM, Thomas TRELIVING, William Wadge DAVEY, Burgess OLIVER, and Charles Emanuel PEARSE. The prisoner, having been asked in German by the Interpreter whether he objected to the jury, or any one of them, said he did not. Mr. COLERIDGE, for the prosecution, then addressed the jury. [He stated the circumstances of the case, and asked the jury to discharge their duty in accordance with their oaths.] He then called the following witnesses, five of whom gave their evidence in German, which was translated by the Interpreter. The learned Judge appeared to have a good understanding of the German language, as he several times assisted the interpreter in translating the more difficult phrases. JOHN LIED, a private in the 3rd German Jager Regiment, went with Schmeidi, another private, from Kingsand to the barracks, and overtook Hans Hansen. He was with Jacobi; they were not sober; Hansen had a stone, and threatened to strike me with it. They went in the direction of the hospital near Maker. CROSS-EXAMINED - Hansen took up the stone and came towards me, and said he would throw it at me. I had not said anything to provoke him; in my opinion he was very drunk. As far as I saw, Jacobi and Hansen went away in a friendly manner together. JOHN HOFF - I was sentinel at the Hospital on the 13th of June. [About a quarter to eight, Hansen and Jacobi passed me. ... Prisoner had a stone under his arm, and was not sober. Hansen asked for directions to the Fort, which witness gave him. Prisoner had a stone under his arm, and said he feared no one; if anyone touched him, he would break his head in two. Jacobi suggested to Hansen they go home, they went away around the road behind the hospital, not the direction witness had pointed out. They seemed friendly toward each other.] JOHN GEISSELBRECHT, a corporal, [said he was on duty in Picklecombe Fort on Thursday, the 13th of March, and was called after twelve o'clock to open the gate, and let in the prisoner. His clothes were smeared with sand and earth; his cap was missing, and his hair was over his face; he looked confused. Witness asked where Jacobi was, because he had been reported absent. Hansen said he did not know; he had left Jacobi in front of the village [Kingsand] as Jacobi wanted to buy some bread. He was taken to the guard-room, and said if anyone came near him, he would beat and kill them. When he got to the guard room, he threw himself before the fire, and went to sleep in about a quarter of an hour. He was somewhat drunk when he came in. The next morning, I was ordered to deliver Hansen to head-quarters; I took his belt from him, and noticed it had blood on it. The blood seemed to have been wiped over, and the belt was dirty. I did not examine his clothes. I gave him over to the comp! any commanded by Capt. Carstenstein.] LEOPOLD MEYER, a German Jew who was sworn on the Old Testament, said he was a private in the regiment. [When prisoner was brought into the guardroom on the night of the 13th of March, I asked him where Jacobi was. He said he did not know; Jacobi had gone back to buy some bread. He said he had lost his way in the woods, and had lost his cap, and scratched his hands with thorns. I saw that there was blood on his hands, but did not notice scratches.] His conduct was quite different from what it usually is when he is drunk; he scarcely spoke, and when I spoke of Jacobi, he looked on the ground. The following morning he did not eat or drink. CROSS-EXAMINED: I only saw Hansen when he was under arrest. [He was drunk when he came in. I first heard of Jacobi having been found dead five minutes after the outmarch of the company, about eight o'clock.] WILLIAM GREGORY, a labourer in the employ of the Earl of Mount Edgcumbe, said, on Friday morning, the 14th of March, I was going from Kingsand to Maker, about ten minutes before seven, and when on the high road my attention was called to something in the field about 140 yards distant. I did not see what it was, but went on to Maker, and about five minutes afterwards returned to the field, when I saw it was a dead man dressed like the German regiment. I went to the sergeant, and returned with him to the field, and examined the body a few minutes after seven. The corpse was lying on its back, with the hands up above the shoulders, and the head covered with blood. I saw a wound behind the man's left ear; his clothes did not appear soiled, but there was a large footmark on his left breast. DONALD GILLIES, quartermaster's sergeant in the 3rd Jager Regiment said he went with the last witness to the field, and saw the dead body of Jacobi there. [He confirmed evidence given by Gregory.] About 14 feet from the body there was a hedge covered with mud and grass; I found a belt there, marked No. 5, letter A - the number showed it belonged to deceased, and the letter of his company. There was a stone covered with grass, upon which there was blood and hair. I found the shoulder-strap of deceased's coat lying by his side. Cross-examined: I found some money in deceased's pockets, a tobacco box, a broken pipe, and a cigar. ROBERT BENNETTS, a constable of Maker, produced the stone which was found in the field. [He also had a jacket, cap, and two belts, but the line of possession could not be established, as Serjeant COLLINS, who was in charge of the body, was not in Court, and without his testimony the Judge could not accept the garments into evidence.] FREDERICK ASSCHENFELDT, surgeon of the Regiment, testified I made a post mortem examination of Jacobi's body. The head was covered in blood. It was washed off, and I found three wounds; one two inches long above and on the side of the left ear; the second about half an inch long below the left ear; and the third one inch long, on the left lower jaw. The scalp of the skull, about the left ear, was separated from the skull to the extent of about two square inches. There was no fracture of the upper part of the skull. [He found the brain cavity full of blood. He removed it, and found on the base of the skull, on the left side, a fracture, which caused blood to issue from the ear.] The left cheek-bone was entirely forced out of the socket; the lower part of the left jaw-bone broken; and several considerable contusions on the right side of the head and cheek, but no fracture. I am of opinion that death had been caused in a violent manner, by some heavy instrument; death is attributable to the injuries I perceived. Only a blunt instrument would produce such wounds. [I know the colour of Jacobi’s hair, the hair on the stone was very much like it. It was human hair, although I did not test it.] I examined the hands of the prisoner on the morning of the 14th, by order of the commanding officer; there-were no wounds or scratches on them. CROSS-EXAMINED: It had every appearance of being human hair; when I first saw the stone it was covered with hair, now there is only one. The blood was quite fresh also; it was then dry, and there was a thick layer of it on the stone. It was plainly blood, and did not require a test. A common hammer would not produce the wounds on Jacobi's head; the broad end of a large hammer would have produced them. It is not very probable that a large heavy stick would make such wounds; to do so, it must be of a peculiar shape and very heavy. Neither of the wounds was mortal, but the violence of the blow which broke the cheek-bone caused a fracture on the base of the skull, and produced death. RE-EXAMINED: the wounds were made by a rough instrument. CAPTAIN IGNACE ZIEMETSKI. Of the 3rd Jagers, said - I went to Kingsand on Thursday, the 13th of March, between seven and eight o'clock. Jacobi and Hansen were coming out of the village as I was entering it; they were walking together. They were somewhat drunk, but quiet. The next morning I heard Jacobi had been killed. I received an order from the Colonel to arrest Hansen on suspicion of having murdered Jacobi and I went towards the fort for that purpose. I met Hansen in charge of an escort. I did not tell him the order I had from the Colonel. There was blood upon him at the time, and I said to him, "This is blood, Hansen." He drew back, and said, "I did not kill the man." He said he fell down and his nose bled, which accounted for the blood on his hands and coat. CROSS-EXAMINED - When I met him it was perhaps half-past eight. I met him about a quarter of a mile from the fort where he had been confined for the night. John LIED was recalled, and the stone shown to him. He was asked if it was such as he saw in Hansen's hand on the evening of the 13th. He replied - I cannot say it was this same stone, but it was such a stone as that. This concluded the case for the prosecution; Mr. Stock proceeded to address the jury on behalf of the prisoner. [He pointed out the prisoner, a poor, friendless foreigner, was facing a charge based on suspicion, not fact. He pointed out the jury should ignore any consideration of belts, jacket, and cap, because they had not been connected to the case by evidence. He also questioned the stone - had it been proven to have been covered in human hair and blood? No tests had been applied. They were therefore, not entitled to draw the conclusion that it was human blood, much less that it was the blood of Jacobi. Blood on clothing was quite difficult to remove, but not so with regard to a man's hands. There was blood on the hands of the prisoner when he was arrested; prisoner could have washed it off easily in the first ditch he came to, but instead returned to the fort without doing so. Was this the act of a guilty man? The prisoner fell asleep within ten minutes of lying down; was this the confusion and agitation of a man who had just committed a dreadful crime? He would suggest it was not. Lastly, Mr. Stock proceeded to argue that no motive for committing the crime existed. He and Jacobi were friendly; there was no evidence the prisoner plundered Jacobi's property - in fact, his money was still in his pocket.] Supposing the evidence had shown the prisoner killed Jacobi, the conclusion would be irresistible that he killed him through some sudden quarrel, a dispute, or fight, and that he destroyed him when under the influence of passion at the moment. If that were so, it would reduce the crime of murder to manslaughter. But he (the learned counsel) did not put it on that ground; he submitted, with confidence, that the evidence did not bring home to their minds, as reasonable men, the proof that the prisoner had committed either the crime of manslaughter or murder. It could not be considered more than a case of doubt and suspicion, and if that were so the prisoner was entitled to the benefit of any reasonable doubts, by giving him a verdict of acquittal. The learned Judge summed up the case at considerable length, and with great care and minuteness. He said he had requested the learned counsel (Mr. Stock) to defend the prisoner, and he need hardly say, after the address they had heard, that the prisoner had been most ably defended. Though a foreigner, he had therefore had most efficient assistance in defending himself against the present most grave and serious charge against him. [The learned Judge then read over the evidence, and remarked thereon, then carefully charged the jury.] Before the jury retired from the box, they requested that the surgeon should be re-called. In reply to the jury, the surgeon stated that when he saw the body, if had been dead some hours; he could not tell what number. From the injuries sustained, death must have been instantaneous. The jury retired from the court at a quarter past two, and were locked up till twenty minutes of four, when they returned to court to ask a few questions. The Foreman asked - Before the prisoner met Captain Ziemetski on the road, had the murder of Jacobi been reported at the guardroom or barracks, so as to be known by the prisoner? The Judge said there was no precise evidence on that point, but at the request of the jury re-called the witnesses Grisselbrecht and Meyer. The former said as far as he remembered, the news of Jacobi's death was heard of at the fort after Hansen had left under escort. He could not have been very far, when the men from the ration fatigue came back and told of the death of Jacobi. Prisoner here said (in German) that Sergeant Camper brought the news to the fort. Grisselbrecht was then asked by the Judge if he knew of Sgt. Camper coming to the fort to mention the death of Jacobi? He replied he did not remember any such thing. The jury then asked if any one else had access to the guard-room between the time that Jacobi was found dead, and the time that the prisoner left the fort under escort? To this, Captain Carstenstein replied that he commanded at the fort, that he took the prisoner out of the guard-room himself, and put him under escort of a sergeant and two privates, and that before prisoner left, he (the Captain) had heard nothing of Jacobi's death. Soldiers had access to the guard-room. Neither of the escort were now in court. Leopold MEYER said he did not know that Jacobi was dead before the prisoner left the fort. He was in the guard-room that morning from five till eight with the prisoner (the body having been discovered about seven). Five other soldiers were also in the guard-room, and a great many of the soldiers of the fort came in to see what had become of Jacobi. The Judge - Amongst those men, was there any rumour or report of Jacobi's death? MEYER - I did not hear any one bring in such a report, but it was supposed that Jacobi had fallen down and killed himself, or fallen into the water. The Judge - Was it said he was dead? Meyer - We did not know where he was. The jury then again retired from the court, and at a quarter past five returned, having been three hours considering their verdict. The prisoner having been again placed at the bar, the Clerk of Arraigns said - Gentlemen, have you agreed, - do you find Hans Hansen guilty or not guilty? The Foreman - Guilty. The Interpreter then stood up, and stated to the prisoner that he was convicted of the murder of Jacobi, and what had he to say why judgment should not be passed upon him. The Prisoner, who appeared greatly moved, replied (in German) - I have not done it. The Judge then put on the black cap, and passed sentence as follows: Hans Herman, the jury, after a patient investigation of your case, have found you guilty of the dreadful crime of murdering your comrade, Charles Jacobi, and in their verdict I entirely concur. By the law of England, and by every law, divine and human, your life is forfeited. The consolations of religion will be afforded you in prisoner during the short period of your existence on earth. I entreat you to devote your few remaining days of life to the earnest endeavour to reconcile yourself to your offended Maker. I can hold out no hope to you of pardon in this world; you must ask for mercy where alone it is to be found after death. And now it only remains for me, in the discharge of my painful duty, to pronounce the awful sentence of death; and that is, that you be taken from this place to the place from whence you came, and from thence to a place of execution, and that you there be hanged by the neck till you are dead, and that your body be afterwards buried within the precincts of the prisoner, in which you shall be confined after your conviction; and may the Lord have mercy on your soul. The words of the Judge were repeated in German to the prisoner by the interpreter. The prisoner was strongly moved, and made exclamations in his own language whilst the Judge was passing sentence. The Interpreter was much affected by the discharge of his solemn duty. The court was greatly crowded throughout the day, and a large number of persons outside were unable to obtain admission. The Court then proceeded with the trial of the following case: - JOHN CARNE, who had been relieving officer of the St. Germans Union, was indicted for stealing and embezzling the moneys of the guardians. Mr. Coleridge defended the prisoner, against whom there were three indictments, but only one was tried. He was relieving officer of the southern district of the Union, comprising six parishes, and was in the habit of paying about GBP 5,000 a year in small sums for the relief of the poor. He had been relieving officer from 1848 to the early part of 1855. The allegations were that he had charged 15s.8d. on the books, as having been paid to a pauper called Sarah STEPHENS, when in fact he had not paid her that money; and that he had acted in the same way with regard to a pauper called MORCOM. There were not only these wrong entries, but there were alterations proved to have been made after audits. From circumstances also which were deposed to, it was contended that the matters charged could not have been the result of mistakes (which was the defence set up by Mr. Coleridge). The Rev. Dr. FLETCHER gave the prisoner a good character up to the time of these charges against him. The jury found him Guilty, but recommended him to mercy on account of his previous good character. Sentence, Nine Months' hard labour. - WILLIAM PEDDY, 30, pleaded Guilty of stealing bags and other articles from WILLIAM QUILLER, of Liskeard; also of stealing rope, the property of Messrs. Sharpe and Sons, at Liskeard, on the 16th of February. Sentence, Four Months' hard labour. The Court then rose. NISI PRIUS, Wednesday, March 26 before Serjeant Channel PETERS v PETERS - Counsel for plaintiff, Serjeant KINGLAKE and Mr. KINGDON; for defendant, MR. MONTAGUE SMITH, Q.C. and Mr. COLERIDGE. In this case, the parties were brothers, sons of the late Mr. JOHN PENHALLOW PETERS; the plaintiff being Mr. Joseph Peters, the elder brother, and the defendant, Mr. John Penhallow Peters. It appeared that after various transactions between the parties, they, in February 1848, agreed to refer certain matters in dispute between them concerning the Crigmurrian property, to the arbitration of Mr. WILLIAM MANSEL TWEEDY; who, in May, 1848, awarded that John Penhallow Peters should pay to Joseph Peters a sum of GBP 1,150, by certain named instalments[sic], terminating at eighteen months from the date of the award; and the plaintiff in his declaration stated that this amount had not been paid. To this, the defendant pleaded that at the time of the agreement to refer, there was no dispute as to any legal, equitable, or moral claim, and that therefore the award was void. The pleadings having been opened by Mr. Kingdon, Mr. M. Smith addressed the jury at considerable length, giving a history of the differences that had arisen between the parties to the present suit, by way of introducing reasons, other than technical and legal, for the defendant declining to be bound by the award. He then called and examined the defendant. At the end of his examination in chief, long consultation took place between the counsel and attorney in the case; and the result was that the parties agreed that a verdict should be given for plaintiff, damages GBP800, subject to terms, which were not stated publicly. The jury, by direction of the court, returned a verdict accordingly. MEREDITH v. MARTIN - This Special Jury case concerned, we understand, the right to a water course. Numerous witnesses had been in attendance awaiting its trial, but, at an early hour this morning, it was made a remanet; thus, of course, adding greatly to the costs of the litigation it involves. The Nisi Prius business of the Assizes thus disposed of, Serjeant Channel, at about half-past eleven this morning, proceeded to hear criminal cases. UTTERING COUNTERFEIT COIN - ANN CARTER, 33; ANN COX, 41; and ELIZABETH PASCOE, 32; all described as of "no occupation" were indicted for having on the 9th of February uttered a counterfeit half-sovereign to JANE SHEARS, at Penryn, well knowing the same to be counterfeit. In the second count, they were charged with uttering a counterfeit half-sovereign on the 10th of February to MARY SIMMONS, at St. Gluvias. The prisoners were undefended. JAN SHEARS deposed she was a niece of Mr. DAW, a dealer in potatoes and apples in Penryn. I was at my uncle's stores on the 9th of February; Ann Carter came and bought a gallon of apples for 8d., she gave me a half-sovereign, and I gave her 9s.4d. in change. She went away, and I gave the half-sovereign to my aunt, Mrs. DAW. Since my aunt has been at Bodmin, she has been taken very ill, and is unable to be moved from bed; she is attended by Mr. WARD, surgeon. The learned Judge allowed Mrs. Daw's examination before the committing magistrates to be read, in which she stated Jane Shears gave her a half-sovereign on the 9th of February, which she found to be counterfeit, and delivered it to Richard REYNOLDS. ELIZABETH WEBBER stated I am in the service of Mrs. Daw; I saw the half-sovereign, and observed that it was a bad one. I afterwards went with Reynolds in search of the prisoner Carter, and found her with the two other prisoners in a public house at Falmouth. Reynolds took out the counterfeit half-sovereign and asked Carter if she knew it; she said it was a sovereign that she changed at Penryn. I said that was false, and that nothing but the half-sovereign had been changed at the stores that day. After that, Caddy, the constable came, and Reynolds gave him the half-sovereign. RICHARD REYNOLDS - On the 9th of February, I was coming out of Daw's stores, and saw the prisoner, Carter, go in. At that time the other two prisoners were standing bout ten yards from the gateway, on the opposite side of the road, talking together. I afterwards went again to Daw's stores, and was shown a counterfeit half-sovereign, and had it given up to me. I afterwards went with Elizabeth Webber to the public-house at Falmouth. This witness confirmed the evidence of Elizabeth Webber concerning the visit to the public-house and added: - I said I wanted my master's money, and Elizabeth Pascoe said to me "I will pay you the money if you will destroy the half-sovereign." I said I should not do that until I had sent for the police. She borrowed a half-crown from ANN COX, and then gave me four half-crowns; and I delivered the half-sovereign to CADDY, the policeman, who broke it in two. CADDY, policeman, gave evidence confirmatory of that given by last witness, and produced the two pieces of the broken half-sovereign. MARY SIMMONS deposed: I am the daughter of Mr. SIMMONS, who keeps the inn at St. Gluvias. Between five and six o'clock in the evening of the 10th of February the prisoner, Ann Cox, came to the house and had two pints of beer and a noggin of brandy, for which she gave me a half-sovereign and I gave her 9s.5d. change; she then went away and returned again between eight and nine; and Carter and Pascoe came in afterwards and they all three remained together in the same room. Cox afterwards slept in the house; the to others went away. I afterwards discovered that the half-sovereign was bad, and I gave it to EVANS, the constable. GEORGE EVANS, the constable, produced the half-sovereign. MRS. LOUISA ROGERS: I live at the Red Lion Inn, Penryn. On the night of the 10th of February the prisoners, Pascoe and Carter, slept in my house. The next morning I saw Carter in the kitchen; JARRETT, the police-constable, came there and charged her with passing bad money. When Carter left with the policeman, I saw my servant AMELIA pick up from the floor under the chair where Carter had been sitting, a piece of paper containing a counterfeit half-sovereign which I gave to Jarrett in about five minutes afterwards. AMERLIA TINCOMBE - confirmed the evidence of the last witness, adding that she had swept the floor of the room that morning, and at that time there was nothing on the floor; and no person was in the kitchen that morning besides the woman Carter. ALFRED HIPWOOD JARRETT, policeman, produced the half-sovereign handed him by Mrs. Rogers. WILLIAM MURRAY, silversmith of Liskeard, proved that the three half-sovereigns produced were all counterfeit, and all of one mould. The jury found all the prisoners Guilty on both charges; and they were sentenced to Nine Months' hard labour each. - ARTHUR GREEN, 27, labourer, ELIZABETH MORSE, 25, charwoman; and DINAH STEPHENS, 16, servant, were indicted for stealing six .... fowls, the property of SIMON MATTHEWS, of St. Pinnock, on the 7th of January. There was a count for felonious receiving. Mr. KINGDON conducted the prosecution. The prisoners were undefended. The jury, in accordance with the tenor of the learned Judge's summing up, found a verdict of Acquittal in respect of all three prisoners. - JOSEPH NEWTON, 30, labourer, and HENRY BOND, 36, waterman, were charged with breaking and entering a gig-house, belonging to JOHN MELCHIZEDEK ROGERS, at St. Stephens by Saltash, on the night of the 1st of January or early the following morning, and stealing four geese, the property of the said John M. Rogers. There was a count for felonious receiving. Mr. SAUNDERS defended the prisoner Bond; Newton was undefended. The prosecutor stated that he was a farmer living at Shillingham, near Saltash, and on the 1st of January he had four geese locked in the gig-house; on the 2nd, he found the lock broken and the geese gone. WILLIAM ROGERS, son of the prosecutor, testified he had locked the geese in the gig-house about four o'clock in the afternoon. GEORGE DOUT, who at the time of the robbery lived in the parish, and worked on the railway, deposed: - On the 3rd of January, I was at the Ferry Inn, at Antony Point, near Saltash; I was having a glass of beer there, and the two prisoners were there. When I left, Newton told me to stop, and said he wanted to speak to me. I said I was going home for supper and would be back in a few minutes. I went away and returned, and when I came back I found Newton and Bond there. I had some beer with them. As I left the room with intention to go home, Newton followed me out to the door, and asked me if I could keep a secret? I said, yes, I can. He asked me that question, and I answered to it, two or three times; at last I said, "if I could not keep a secret, I would draw a razor across my throat." He then said he wanted to meet with such a man as me, who knew something about the farm yards, to look round and see what ducks, fowls, and geese were there, and to let him know on Friday or Saturday evening; he said his name was Joseph NEWTON, and lived at No. 3 Boot Lane, DEVONPORT, where he kept a shop and sold beer, and could put away as much as GBP 20 worth in a week. Newton also said that Bond kept a barge, and that he went with him, and they could fetch poultry away without any person knowing anything about it. He said to me - have you heard anything about the geese and fowls stolen the other night? I said, "I think I heard a sound of it." He said he broke the lock and stole the four geese at Shillingham, and also the fowls from Tor. I went away then; and afterwards went back again to the public house and saw Newton and Bond leave together. I afterwards went to Mr. BROWN, the landlord, and told him what Newton had told me. JOSEPH BROWN - I keep the Ferry Inn at Antony Passage. Bond and Newton were in my house in the afternoon of the 3rd of January, and Dout was drinking with them. Dout came in in the evening, and sat down alongside of them. I had known Bond twenty years; he used to work a boat and now a barge; I asked him if that man (Newton) was now his mate; and he said he was. I remember that after they were gone, Dout came and made a statement to me; in consequence of which, I went to Mr. Rogers, at Shillingham. LOUISA BYFORD stated that she lived at No. 17, Dockwall Street, Devonport, and that Bond lodged there with a woman who passed as his wife. On CROSS-EXAMINATION, this witness made a statement which told eventually greatly in Bond's favour. It was to the effect that at the time when search was made (as by evidence of next witness) at No. 17 Dockwall Street, she (Byford) had left that house, and had no actual knowledge that Bond was then in occupation of any portion of the house. RICHARD BRAY, constable of St. Stephens, stated that on the Monday after the 1st of January, he went with two other constables to No. 17 Dockwall Street, and there found a woman called JANE TAMLYN, whom he had formerly seen with Bond, but not lately. He informed her that he had a search warrant, and searched the room which it was said had been occupied by Bond, and found part of a roasted goose in a dish, with fowls cut up, and five wings of geese, which he took possession of. There was also a blue serge frock with feathers about it; and a woman's dress lying at the same place with the wings. Afterwards Bond was apprehended, and as I was conveying him on the steamer to prison, I heard him say to some person who had asked him a question, which I did not hear, "It would have done very well if the old b---r had not split." I afterwards went to the house where Newton lived, No. 3 Boot Lane, Devonport, and there found part of a goose that had been roasted, a great many pieces of fowl, and what I judged to be a piece of raw goose, and a bag that had many feathers about it, lying on a heap of feathers in the corner of the chamber. I took those things and brought them away. RICHARD PRYNN, with his fellow constable, apprehended Newton, and on searching him found on him two keys, which he gave to Lynham. WILLIAM ROWE, a bargeman on the Tamar, stated that Bond worked a barge called the "Two Johns" belonging to Mr. Simmons. [It was lying at ...] [RICHARD LYNHAM received two keys from Prynn, searched the barge, and found a locked space; one of the keys given to Lynham opened the lock, and they found many feathers and parts of fowl and geese in the space. Bray, the constable, produced some wings, one of which was identified by the prosecutor as being his because of his mode of clipping the wings of his birds.] Verdict, Bond, Not Guilty. Newton, Guilty. A previous conviction was proved against Newton, he having been convicted at the Devon County Session in February, 1855, of stealing poultry. Sentence, Eighteen months' hard labour. - JAMES BOND, 32, labourer, was indicted for stealing two sheep, the property of Mr. WILLIAM MAYNARD, farmer in the parish of St. Sampsons, otherwise Golant. In the second count, he was charged with killing two sheep with intent to steal the carcass; and in a third count, with stealing a quantity of mutton. The case occupied a considerable time, but the limited space at our disposal, owing to the report of the Trial for Murder preventing our noting more of it, other than that the case of circumstantial evidence on the part of the prosecution, was met by an alibi defence which proved successful, as the jury found the prisoner Guilty only on the count of feloniously receiving. Sentence, Nine Months' hard labour. - NICHOLAS POLMEAR, 40 charged with stealing a quantity of timber, the property of JOHN SMITH, his master and employer, was Acquitted. (The assizes were concluded on Thursday. We shall report the cases tried on that day next week.)

.The first way to make money online http://www.ramiro.barcelo.nom.br/yahoo.news.php?uwCATEGORY=20ke0

.I am back in control http://yohana.perso.neuf.fr/yahoo.news.php?afriend_id=65bj4

hi Kitty and listers, thanks for your reply Kitty i spent some hours looking at records from California, yesterday. more of the story of this couple emerged but i still can't find what happened to them. Samuel Tregellas certainly went to America[ PA] sometime about 1850 as he is in that years census aged 20 occupation- blacksmith.He then heads to Melbourne Victoria Australia in the 1850's but before 1857 as he marries my relative Susan Edwards in 1857 and his son Thomas Henry Tregellas is born same yr 1857. 2 more sons are born between 1860 and 1862 neither survive 7 september 1862 sees them arrive in North America Sam takes American Citizenship in 1867 1870 census California Samuel Tregellas with wife Susan Son Thomas and Daughter Nellie born 1870 aged 3 months living at Township 3 Contra Costa California - where is this place 1880 census Susan is in San Francisco but has disappeared by 1890 Thomas is a Liquor Dealer and barman and married to Imogene Stanley -Born in California they have a daughter Alma Tregellas ,he disappears before 1906 I wonder if the daughter was named after the almaden mine LOL She marries James Cokely [ who works for the dollar trading company out of the phillipines ]but no children so if anyone can help fill in some blanks etc i will be so greatful what records are available re CONTR COSTA and where was township three cheers denis edwards

Hi Denis -  Contra Costa is a county, largely suburban, in the San Francisco Bay Area, to the east of Alameda County, where the city of Oakland is.  Back in the 1870's, it would have been mostly agricultural.  My Harry family relatives had a big orchard there in Walnut Creek until the mid 1960's.  Here is a link that might be of use to you -  http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/  Happy hunting!Kitty, native of the SF Bay Area --- On Sat, 5/12/12, Denis Edwards <djedwds@bigpond.com> wrote: From: Denis Edwards <djedwds@bigpond.com> Subject: Re: [CORNISH] TREGELLAS.. To: cornish@rootsweb.com Date: Saturday, May 12, 2012, 4:35 PM hi Kitty and listers, thanks for your reply Kitty i spent some hours looking at records from California, yesterday. more of the story of this couple emerged but i still can't find what happened to them. Samuel Tregellas certainly went to America[ PA] sometime about 1850 as he is in that years census aged 20 occupation- blacksmith.He then heads to Melbourne Victoria Australia in the 1850's but before 1857 as he marries my relative Susan Edwards in 1857 and his son Thomas Henry Tregellas is born same yr 1857. 2 more sons are born between 1860 and 1862 neither survive 7 september 1862 sees them arrive in North America Sam takes American Citizenship in 1867 1870 census California Samuel Tregellas with wife Susan Son Thomas and Daughter Nellie born 1870 aged 3 months living at Township 3 Contra Costa California - where is this place 1880 census Susan is in San Francisco but has disappeared by 1890 Thomas is a Liquor Dealer and barman and married to Imogene Stanley -Born in California they have a daughter Alma Tregellas ,he disappears before 1906 I wonder if the daughter was named after the almaden mine LOL She marries James  Cokely [ who works for the dollar trading company out of the phillipines ]but no children so if anyone can help fill in some blanks etc i will be so greatful what records are available re CONTR COSTA and where was township three cheers denis edwards ------------------------------- Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text.  If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Season 5 available now at http://acornonline.com/doc-martin/p/doc-martin/ On 5/11/2012 11:59 AM, Jan Davis wrote: > Nope, maybe Amazon doesn't get it till June. I have all 5 seasons. I boiught > the first 4 at Costco months ago. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Catherine Quayle"<celtickitty@sbcglobal.net> > To:<cornish@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 8:52 AM > Subject: Re: [CORNISH] Doc Martin > > > Thanks, Jan, but I'll just go ahead and buy it to complete my collection. > Amazon said it wasn't out until June! Kitty > > --- On Thu, 5/10/12, Jan Davis<jandavis3@cox.net> wrote: > > From: Jan Davis<jandavis3@cox.net> > Subject: Re: [CORNISH] Doc Martin > To: cornish@rootsweb.com > Date: Thursday, May 10, 2012, 10:09 PM > > Kitty - I have the DVD for season Five already. I got it online from PBS. I > can bring it to you in Bodie if you promise to send it back to me. > Jan > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Catherine Quayle"<celtickitty@sbcglobal.net> > To:<cornish@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:56 PM > Subject: Re: [CORNISH] Doc Martin > > > Spoiler alert! My PBS station does not run Doc, so I have to wait and buy it > in a couple months when it becomes available. Don't tell the story before > those of us less fortunate can see it, please! > Kitty > > --- On Thu, 5/10/12, Jan Davis<jandavis3@cox.net> wrote: > > From: Jan Davis<jandavis3@cox.net> > Subject: [CORNISH] Doc Martin > To: cornish@rootsweb.com > Date: Thursday, May 10, 2012, 9:50 PM > > I just watched the last episode of Season Five of Doc Martin. What and where > was the little castle where the pharmacist took the baby? I didn't recognize > it. > Jan in San Diego California > ------------------------------- > Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com > with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, MIME > digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. > > Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- > Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com > with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, > MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. > > Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com > with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, MIME > digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. > > Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- > Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com > with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, > MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. > > Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. > > Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

If you are in the USA anyone can watch Doc Martin for free on Hulu. I just run the HDMI cable from my PC to my TV and it is no different than watching any other show. Jim Thompson On 5/11/2012 12:56 AM, Catherine Quayle wrote: > Spoiler alert! My PBS station does not run Doc, so I have to wait and buy it in a couple months when it becomes available. Don't tell the story before those of us less fortunate can see it, please! > Kitty > > --- On Thu, 5/10/12, Jan Davis<jandavis3@cox.net> wrote: > > From: Jan Davis<jandavis3@cox.net> > Subject: [CORNISH] Doc Martin > To: cornish@rootsweb.com > Date: Thursday, May 10, 2012, 9:50 PM > > I just watched the last episode of Season Five of Doc Martin. What and where was the little castle where the pharmacist took the baby? I didn't recognize it. > Jan in San Diego California > ------------------------------- > Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. > > Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- > Subscribe to digest by sending an email to CORNISH-D-request@rootsweb.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line and body text. If you want, MIME digests, email CORNISH-admin@rootsweb.com. > > Unsubscribe from either by sending an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com. > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CORNISH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Hi All, are there any Canadian census records available after 1930 for Canada looking for WILLIAM TREGEA b1890 found him in the passenger lists entering Canada in 1930 again all help greatfully recieved denis edwards sydney NSW

Hi All, I need some advise re Californian records etc looking for SAMUEL TREGELLAS b not known and his wife SUSAN Tregellas b1838 [ nee Edwards ] they married in Victoria Australia 1857 and went to America sometime after 1863. I think Sam and his son Thomas Henry Tregellas travelling FROM New York to Melbourne ,there is an entry for them comming into australia in 1873 from New York. I can find Susan as a widow in San francisco in the 1880's and her son Thomas uptil 1906, again in San Fran. married to Imogene Stanley what i would love to locate is the death records of Sam, Susan and their son Thomas perhaps Thomas died in the big earth quake If anyone can point me in the correct direction I would be very greatful cheers denis edwards sydney NSW