In a message dated 3/11/2006 1:54:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, bvelke@whollygenes.com writes: Actually, that's precisely what Joan said on March 9th <g> and that's why I responded (quoting her in my message). Others have made similarly blanket statements which perpetuate false rumors about what falls under copyright and what does not. Actually you are taking that statement out of context as it referred specifically to the census images in question and the situation at hand in this discussion--enhanced quality images of public domain census films. Joan

Joan said: >>Actually, that's precisely what Joan said on March 9th <g> and that's why I >>responded (quoting her in my message). Others have made similarly blanket >>statements which perpetuate false rumors about what falls under copyright >>and what does not. > >Actually you are taking that statement out of context as it referred >specifically to the census images in question and the situation at hand in >this >discussion--enhanced quality images of public domain census films. I considered the context, thanks. Bob Velke President Archive CD Books USA www.ArchiveCDBooksUSA.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.1/279 - Release Date: 3/10/2006