Dawn, Yes therre was a typo. Margaret is a Farrell. Sorry. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: Dawn Hux Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 8:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [COLAKE] Fw: Holland Thanks for the info. Maybe John Holland was the husband of Margaret Holland. Since he died in 1895, there is enough time for Margaret to remarry and say in the 1900 Census she has been married one year to Isaac Porter. One of the Holland children is also named John. Margaret also said she had 10 children and 8 were living so maybe the Holland no first name is a child. I wonder if the Margaret Harrell is really a Farrell? My Catherine Farrell had a sister named Margaret, maybe she was named after the Margaret that died in 1900 at age 75. Well I can see I have some new clues to work with. Thanks a million. Dawn > -----Original Message----- > From: Gail Meyer Kilgore [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 6:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [COLAKE] Fw: Holland > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Julie Irwin <[email protected]> > To: Gail Meyer Kilgore <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 10:29 AM > Subject: Re: Holland > > > Gail, we found a Margaret Harrell died July 3, 1900 at age 75. There is > also a John Holland that died March 4, 1895 age 42, Listed only. There is > also another Holland no first name at site E37, gives no dates or > anything. > > > ><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p>