Cool! *Dear Family Tree DNA Group Administrator:* *“This is the most exciting genetic genealogy breakthrough since the company launched its Y-DNA test, which uncovered relatives in the direct paternal line”*, says Bennett Greenspan, founder and President of Family Tree DNA. Family Tree DNA is pleased to inform you of the pre-launch of our newest test: the autosomal-based Family Finder test. This pre-launch will progress in phases so that we do not exceed our lab’s capacity, and to ensure delivering results in a timely basis. A limited number of our customers are being offered the Family Finder Test during the prelaunch. We anticipate Family Finder will be offered for general release in the middle of March at the breakthrough price of *$249*. While the Y-DNA matches men with a specific paternal line, and the mtDNA finds potential relatives only along the maternal line, Family Finder can look for close relationships along all ancestral lines. You may now match to male and female cousins from any of your family lines within five generations. The science behind it uses linked blocks of DNA across the 22 autosomal chromosomes and matches them between two people. Based on this concept, our bioinformatics team has worked extensively to develop the calculations that would tell you the closeness of the relationship. *The possibilities to find matches abound:* [image: Bullet] Aunts & Uncles, Parents and Grandparents [image: Bullet] Half siblings and 1st cousins [image: Bullet] 2nd, 3rd, and 4th cousins [image: Bullet] Possibly 5th cousins and beyond! *When you take the Family Finder test, your results are compared against our Family Finder database. You will be able to:* [image: Bullet] sort your matches by degree of relationship [image: Bullet] view their names and e-mail address for immediate communication [image: Bullet] download your raw data Read more about Family Finder testing and Projects.<http://www.familytreedna.com/landing/family-finder.aspx> *Special Note: **The Family Finder test requires an untouched vial of DNA. If your kit does not have an extra vial on file, we will mail a collection kit for a new FREE DNA extraction. After ordering you will be notified by email whether we are able to use a stored vial or will be mailing a new collection kit.* © All Contents Copyright 2001-2010 Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
Some of y'all may be interested in this. I'm having enough trouble just getting my direct line. John W. Coats
I'm interested in the Henry Coates because of his wife Sarah Young. She could be related to my Mom's side of the family. My records are in storage at the moment, but here is what I had on Henry: Henry and his wife lived in Richmond, VA but then moved to Wilkes Co., GA. He or his son Henry were granted 200 acres in a 1774 land grant in St. Paul Co. in 1774 and 200 more acres in Wilkes Co., GA on 1/28/1778. This last grant was on the same day as a Nathaniel and a James Coates (other brothers or sons?). (C-1790, E) What is the circumstantial evidence you have on Henry's possible daughters? Larry Coates had written me about this family back in 1999 at larcoa@aspermont.esc14.net. Maybe he knows of male descendants for Henry. Linda Coate On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:10 PM, REV C FORDE <spiritsouth@gmail.com> wrote: > The first and last record for Henry Coates of NE GA dates to 1772. I am > interested in knowing the background of this Henry Coats/Coates who may be > the same as Henry Coates who married Sarah Young of VA. > > There is circumstantial evidence that Henry Coates and Sarah Young had the > following children who resided in Wilkes County, GA until ca. 1815: > > Nathaniel > Lesley or Leslie > Henrietta who married John Bankston > Jane Smiley Coates who married Howell Jarrett > William > James > John > > I know of no living male descendants to become YDNA donors for testing but > if there are any I am happy to pay the fees. > > > -- > The Rev. Dr. Cynthia Forde > 13506 Northshore Drive > Montgomery, Texas 77356 > 713.503.0836 phone > cynthiaforde@gmail.com > spiritsouth@gmail.com > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > >
Also, their testing points won't transfer in to our group though and show up on our charts. On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Linda Coate <lcoate@ancestrees.com> wrote: > They use most of the same DNA points but not all. Linda > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:42 PM, John Coats <jwcoats@htc.net> wrote: > >> Well, I went ahead and signed up with Ancestry.com, and am going to have >> my Y-DNA tested, in order to compare with our current DNA. More than a >> little confusing, since the name is close, but they use Sorenson. I >> don't see how it could be any different, unless they use different >> sites. I'd like to get some feedback from any others who may have done >> this. I still can't figure out the ancestor of James Robert Coats since >> one source says he married Elizabeth Webster before 1805, but could this >> have been James Coats of Edgefield, who married Elizabeth Scott, and was >> definately the son of John Gentleman Coats. If anyone can help me with >> this conundrum let me know on my personal e-mail or call me at >> 618-281-5088 or cell 618-407-2000. Hope everyone made it through the >> Holidays in good health and happy. It seems as thought all the people I >> grew up with are dropping all around me like flys, from one illness or >> another; and I'm only 69. I hope to finish this thing before I go. John >> W. Coats >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >
They use most of the same DNA points but not all. Linda On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:42 PM, John Coats <jwcoats@htc.net> wrote: > Well, I went ahead and signed up with Ancestry.com, and am going to have > my Y-DNA tested, in order to compare with our current DNA. More than a > little confusing, since the name is close, but they use Sorenson. I > don't see how it could be any different, unless they use different > sites. I'd like to get some feedback from any others who may have done > this. I still can't figure out the ancestor of James Robert Coats since > one source says he married Elizabeth Webster before 1805, but could this > have been James Coats of Edgefield, who married Elizabeth Scott, and was > definately the son of John Gentleman Coats. If anyone can help me with > this conundrum let me know on my personal e-mail or call me at > 618-281-5088 or cell 618-407-2000. Hope everyone made it through the > Holidays in good health and happy. It seems as thought all the people I > grew up with are dropping all around me like flys, from one illness or > another; and I'm only 69. I hope to finish this thing before I go. John > W. Coats > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > >
**The following list of Henrietta Coates Bankston's children's names is circumstantial evidence that she descends from Henry Coates and Sarah Leigh Young: *1.* JOHN6 BANKSTON* (P**ETER*5*, L**AWRENCE*4*, A**NDREW*3* B**ANKSON, ** J**R.**, ANDERS **(**BENGTSSON**)*2*, B**ENGT*1*)* was born 11 Aug 1758 in North Carolina, and died 15 Sep 1823 in Washington Parish, Louisiana. He married HENRIETTA COATES Bef. 1785, daughter of HENRY COATES and SARAH YOUNG . She was born 08 Jan 1760 in Probably Virginia, and died 02 Mar 1838 in Dyson-Bankston Cemetery Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana. Children of JOHN BANKSTON and HENRIETTA COATES are: 2. i. LEVI H.7 BANKSTON, b. Abt. 1779. ii. CECILIA BANKSTON, b. Abt. 1781; d. Abt. 1859; m. W ILLIAM DYSON; b. 19 Mar 1768; d. Oct 1834. iii. HENRY HARRISON BANKSTON, b. Abt. 1783; d. Abt. 1812; m. CELIA LEA. 3. iv. LESLEY BANKSTON, b. Abt. 1785; d. Abt. 1880. v. JOHN YOUNG BANKSTON, b. Abt. 1787; m. ELIZABETH MAYS. 4. vi. PETER YOUNG BANKSTON, b. 15 Jan 1789; d. 18 May 1878. 5. vii. SIMEON COATES BANKSTON, b. 06 May 1791; d. 31 Mar 1877. viii. REBECCA NARCISSUS BANKSTON, b. Abt. 1793; m. THOMASS MITH. 6. ix. HOWELL BANKSTON, b. Abt. 1795; d. 24 Jun 1824. x. JOHN JACQUES BANKSTON, b. 03 Mar 1797; d. Abt. 1870. 7. xi. ELIZA BANKSTON, b. Abt. 1800; d. Abt. 1867. xii. SPENCER M. BANKSTON, b. Abt. 1802; m. LOUISE WATSON. -- The Rev. Dr. Cynthia Forde 13506 Northshore Drive Montgomery, Texas 77356 713.503.0836 phone cynthiaforde@gmail.com spiritsouth@gmail.com
The first and last record for Henry Coates of NE GA dates to 1772. I am interested in knowing the background of this Henry Coats/Coates who may be the same as Henry Coates who married Sarah Young of VA. There is circumstantial evidence that Henry Coates and Sarah Young had the following children who resided in Wilkes County, GA until ca. 1815: Nathaniel Lesley or Leslie Henrietta who married John Bankston Jane Smiley Coates who married Howell Jarrett William James John I know of no living male descendants to become YDNA donors for testing but if there are any I am happy to pay the fees. -- The Rev. Dr. Cynthia Forde 13506 Northshore Drive Montgomery, Texas 77356 713.503.0836 phone cynthiaforde@gmail.com spiritsouth@gmail.com
Well, I went ahead and signed up with Ancestry.com, and am going to have my Y-DNA tested, in order to compare with our current DNA. More than a little confusing, since the name is close, but they use Sorenson. I don't see how it could be any different, unless they use different sites. I'd like to get some feedback from any others who may have done this. I still can't figure out the ancestor of James Robert Coats since one source says he married Elizabeth Webster before 1805, but could this have been James Coats of Edgefield, who married Elizabeth Scott, and was definately the son of John Gentleman Coats. If anyone can help me with this conundrum let me know on my personal e-mail or call me at 618-281-5088 or cell 618-407-2000. Hope everyone made it through the Holidays in good health and happy. It seems as thought all the people I grew up with are dropping all around me like flys, from one illness or another; and I'm only 69. I hope to finish this thing before I go. John W. Coats
Dear List; Earlier today, I sent a message suggesting that there had been an interruption in a male DNA line in my family, BUT NOT THE COATS LINE. It was one of my grandmother's lines, and it proved to be a false alarm. The confusion happened because my great-grandfather and great-great-grandfather died within two years of each other, 1850-1852. So, the DNA line went uninterrupted. Now, if I could just get them to test and let me know the results. Dang. John W.
Just a note to wish everyone a Happy New Year. Something us Coatses can be thankful for is that most of our male DNA has emerged intact over seven or more generations. Thanks to some careful research on another one of my lines, I'm finding certain discrepancies in birth dates, probate dates, etc. which make it clear there may have been a disconnect in the male DNA a few generations back. However, this was on the female side of my line, so the disconnect wouldn't have shown up. After 20 years of research, I can say this is a pretty big shock to me. No wonder, when I attended a reunion with this line, they were in unanimous agreement that they would not be doing DNA testing, or at least not displaying it on a web page. However, this proves the value of doing the testing, since the test will prove or disprove the accuracy of our paper trail. In ending, I'm just hoping all you Coatses out there will do your male testing, and decide for yourself if you want to share it. God Bless you all. John W.
A nice Christmas for me would be to be able to find a Coats relative of mine that would be willing to be tested. ( smile ) Steve Pearson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Linda Coate" <lcoate@ancestrees.com> To: <Coates-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 10:35 PM Subject: [COATES] Happy Holidays > > I wanted to wish a lovely, peaceful holiday to you and yours. I also > wanted to update you on our Coates DNA project. We've had some new > members join and others increase their DNA points tested. Family Tree > DNA is really coming through with the tests quickly now so it's a > great time to join or improve ones test sample. Thanks to all of you > who have participated this year! It's great. I'll try to recap some > of our biggest finds this year in an email soon. Linda Coate > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >
I wanted to wish a lovely, peaceful holiday to you and yours. I also wanted to update you on our Coates DNA project. We've had some new members join and others increase their DNA points tested. Family Tree DNA is really coming through with the tests quickly now so it's a great time to join or improve ones test sample. Thanks to all of you who have participated this year! It's great. I'll try to recap some of our biggest finds this year in an email soon. Linda Coate
This is the time to do your DNA test, or upgrade. I could be a nice Christmas present for your family. John W. Coats
I've just updated our Coates DNA webpage again. We now have a grouping of 3 cousins in the William Coates of Halifax Co., VA line. He's another one of our group who had to wait a couple years to find cousin matches, but that's finally working out. It's a good idea if everyone who has joined the group look on this page at http://www.ancestrees.com/dna/family.html. That is so you can make sure that what you wanted linked to your kit number is still linked. If there are any improvements you want made to your info, please just let me know. Anyone who is not yet linked but would like to, that would be great too. You don't have to make the webpage, just provide the information you want shared. :) Linda Coate, admin.
Linda sorry to be so late on this response but to be frank I can't tell you much about John Coats Sr. Just that there was a John Coats Sr living next to John Coats Jr. in Newberry Twp., Miami Co., OH in either the 1840 or 1830 Federal Census. I am quite certain if not positive the the Jr is my John and Martha Coats line. Also then there is the earlier research speculation that my John Coats was a Jr., son of John and Susan Brock Coats... Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Linda Coate" <lcoate@ancestrees.com> To: <coates@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:21 PM Subject: Re: [COATES] Johns > Steve, What can you tell us about John Coats, Sr.? Thanks, Linda Coate > On 9/3/2009 7:55 PM, Steve Pearson wrote: >> John, >> >> I used to think my John Coats of Miami Co., OH., who married Martha >> (Patsey) >> Rudy was a Junior to a John Coats Senior, and I still think he may have >> been >> a Jr., however the complete theory was that John Sr married a Susan Brock >> supposed daughter of Elias and Ann (Hollingsworth) Brock and that his >> father >> was Gentleman John Coats. I gave up on this theory due to a lack of >> evidence that Gentleman John ever had a John that migrated to the Miami >> Valley of OH. Also gave up the idea that a Susan Brock ever existed. I >> have >> not seen a family group record of a Susan being a daughter of Elias and >> Ann >> with supporting evidence other than this "theory". With that said, is it >> possible this DNA study is reviving this theory of my Coats line once >> again? >> What exactly is the story of this John who was a son of Gentleman John? >> Can >> someone help me out here? I wish my Coats line could be tested but we >> have >> not been able to locate a male Coats of this line that is willing to do >> so >> as of yet. Linda knows my story well. >> >> Steve Pearson >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "John Coats"<jwcoats@htc.net> >> To:<Coates-L@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:08 AM >> Subject: [COATES] Johns >> >> >> >>> Dear Group, Sorry if I mislead or confused anyone with my latest >>> posts. After looking at some old records, I see that John Sr. was >>> probably the son of John Gentleman Coats. At least that's what I got >>> from Linda Coate. If that is true, then the R1a1 group of Coatses is >>> separate from all those who descended from Gentleman John and Marmaduke >>> Coats. I didn't know John Sr. was a son of John Gent. That means my >>> James Robert, Charlotte's Rev Will, and Buster's Major John were an >>> altogether separate group. >>> >>> When I uploaded our R1a1 results to Nat Geo, they have us on the map >>> splitting off from those who continued up North and West and became the >>> Vikings. The map shows the M-17 group coming Southeast to the Russian >>> Steppes and becoming the Kurgan Culture. Of course that would have been >>> 10,000 years ago. Who knows where they left from to come to the US. My >>> guess is they migrated westward and came from Scotland, England or >>> Ireland. Best Regards, John W. Coats P.S. Linda, I'm still looking for >>> the papers of Gary Coates of Whitehall, Ill. I'll send them if and when >>> I find them. >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes >>> in the subject and the body of the message >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.75/2341 - Release Date: >> 09/02/09 05:50:00 >> >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >
this is research from another Coates; not sure he wants his email and name posted, so just posting the research for now.... What I have found is Charles Coates, 1675 Westfield England - Oct 1729, Married Ester Neal around 1680 Children Charles 1707 - 1795 (?) Elizabeth 1707 - 1760 (?) Elizabeth 1707 - 1720 (?) Charles W. 1710-1795 (?) Stephen 1712-1758 Abigal 1714 Margaret 1719 - 1760
Linda, Nancy Ailes was my gggaunt married Samuel in Halifax VA 1806 or 1811 her father WM Medley To: coates@rootsweb.com From: "Linda Coate" <lcoate@ancestrees.com> Subject: Re: [COATES] samuel coates and nancy ailes Stephanie, Remind me of your two people. Linda Coate On 9/2/2009 9:14 PM, stephanie wright wrote: > anyone recevied any info on my two people i am still stuck after all this time Linda anything new Stephanie Wright > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.75/2341 - Release Date: 09/02/09 05:50:00 > > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Stephanie, Remind me of your two people. Linda Coate On 9/2/2009 9:14 PM, stephanie wright wrote: > anyone recevied any info on my two people i am still stuck after all this time Linda anything new Stephanie Wright > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.75/2341 - Release Date: 09/02/09 05:50:00 > >
Dear List, Hello from UK. I have a William Coates Bc 1815 who left UK (Yorkshire) possibly in the 1840's. He lived Palmyra, New York State, Married Christianna Chapman in 1846, his son John.C.Coates was born 1847.William visted Brawby Place( now called Neponset), Illinois in The 1850's and died there. Christianna ran the farm alone and raised her son. John C.Coates married Bertha/Bridget Bushell/Bushnell. They did well in USA and their son was Francis William Coates B 1887 D 1940. Does anyone have connections to this family? Caroline Haywood ----- Original Message ----- From: <coates-request@rootsweb.com> To: <coates@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 8:01 AM Subject: COATES Digest, Vol 4, Issue 45 > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Johns (Coats Family History) > 2. Re: Johns (John Coats) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:51:55 -0500 > From: Coats Family History <coats.genealogy@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [COATES] Johns > To: coates@rootsweb.com > Cc: Coates-L@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: > <9af006f50909040551h55c1d84er5876eb6aa3b15bcf@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > That is correct John....:) Although our William and Charles lived in > Newberry and William died in Kershaw County, SC, they are a separate group > of Coats out of Maryland...I suspect they are all brothers but again no > records yet to prove they are brothers or cousins to each other...the info > on our group has now gone into MD but we still don't know how Charles in > MD > was connected and that New England area is still very much under > researched...although there has been much speculation on connections, > documentation is still very much lacking in that New England area...which > is > very interesting since, that area has some really really good records...so > Charles in MD could very well have come out of any of the surrounding > areas...where records are not so forthcoming...In the SC group of brothers > and/or cousins in our line, I suspect there is: William, Charles, John, > Notley and James...also I do believe Notley may have been the executor on > that deed of William's...Notley and Netty could very easily be a mistaken > interp for that deed...Netty was thought to be Notley's wife but it makes > more sense that Notley was an executor rather than Netty, so that also > lends > more *documentation* that William of Newberry/Kershaw was a brother to the > rest...but like Curt says we still don't know what happened to WIlliam > land > in MD, no record as of yet has been found that he sold it, we also don't > know about the wife's name of Mary in MD and Frances in SC....was she a > Mary > Frances or was Frances a second wife... > > Most of the analyses has been centered in SC but it will be records out of > that area that will give us some better indications of all > these...Frances' > dad and my Dad both believed that Rev Will's dad was a James, although I > do > believe the documentation is good now that Rev Will's father was William > of > Kings Creek and his mother at least was Frances. I think it was Frances' > father or Mrs. Rohwer who thought that James in Georgia was the James in > our > group and that part of his family went down into Jefferson County GA...I > believe the Charles in Jefferson County GA was the Charles from Kelly's > Creek in SC, no indication in the records as to what happened to his > wife...but he and a James, who I believe was his son could have been James > the brother, since I'm not sure what happened to him...James I think gets > a > land grant in GA about 1784, much later than when William and Charles > first > show up in SC in 1772/1773 > > There is also a John Coats, that had land excepted from a Deed to Thomas > Coats in SC, this could very well mean he was a son of Thomas although > he's > not mentioned in any other records...the major problem in this area, is > that > so many earlier researchers have just assumed that all those of a like > name > in SC were the same person...and getting out of that old train of thought > is > not easy....:) So with so much speculation in the records, that makes the > DNA results that much more important....:) > > Y'all have a wonderful Labor Day week end!! > > Char > > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:08 AM, John Coats <jwcoats@htc.net> wrote: > >> Dear Group, Sorry if I mislead or confused anyone with my latest >> posts. After looking at some old records, I see that John Sr. was >> probably the son of John Gentleman Coats. At least that's what I got >> from Linda Coate. If that is true, then the R1a1 group of Coatses is >> separate from all those who descended from Gentleman John and Marmaduke >> Coats. I didn't know John Sr. was a son of John Gent. That means my >> James Robert, Charlotte's Rev Will, and Buster's Major John were an >> altogether separate group. >> >> When I uploaded our R1a1 results to Nat Geo, they have us on the map >> splitting off from those who continued up North and West and became the >> Vikings. The map shows the M-17 group coming Southeast to the Russian >> Steppes and becoming the Kurgan Culture. Of course that would have been >> 10,000 years ago. Who knows where they left from to come to the US. My >> guess is they migrated westward and came from Scotland, England or >> Ireland. Best Regards, John W. Coats P.S. Linda, I'm still looking for >> the papers of Gary Coates of Whitehall, Ill. I'll send them if and when >> I find them. >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > > -- > A shameless plug for my web activities: > > Support Authentic Cherokee Art - look for the Cherokee Authentication > tag - > that insures they are a tribal citizen > > Indian Arts and Craft Act: > http://nativeamericanlawus.blogspot.com > > Freedmen vs Cherokee Nation: > http://freedmenvscherokeenation.blogspot.com/ > > Cherokee Basket Weaver's Association: > http://cherokeebasketweaversassociation.org/ > > Cherokee Basket Weaving Books: > http://www.lulu.com/groups/indianbasketweaving > > Cherokee Artists Association > http://www.cherokeeartistsassociation.org > > Coats Archive: > http://www.coatsarchive.us > > Pages Through Time > http://www.pagesthroughtime.us > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:03:42 -0500 > From: John Coats <jwcoats@htc.net> > Subject: Re: [COATES] Johns > To: coates@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: <4AA1102E.5000907@htc.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > John Coats wrote: Steve; John Henry told me you were having > trouble. Linda sent me the story of John Coats Sr., saying he was the > son of John Gent. She has the court records from the divorce > proceedings. Looks like his son was Samuel. I think the DNA tests have > cleared up a lot of misconception about the Coats line. I believe John > Gent and Marmaduke were cousins, and probably were the Quakers. I > believe our line is a totally different line, and may have been in NC > instead of SC. Who know where they came from before that. If you could > get someone to test, at least you could separate or connect with one of > these. Good Luck, John >> John, >> >> I used to think my John Coats of Miami Co., OH., who married Martha >> (Patsey) >> Rudy was a Junior to a John Coats Senior, and I still think he may have >> been >> a Jr., however the complete theory was that John Sr married a Susan Brock >> supposed daughter of Elias and Ann (Hollingsworth) Brock and that his >> father >> was Gentleman John Coats. I gave up on this theory due to a lack of >> evidence that Gentleman John ever had a John that migrated to the Miami >> Valley of OH. Also gave up the idea that a Susan Brock ever existed. I >> have >> not seen a family group record of a Susan being a daughter of Elias and >> Ann >> with supporting evidence other than this "theory". With that said, is it >> possible this DNA study is reviving this theory of my Coats line once >> again? >> What exactly is the story of this John who was a son of Gentleman John? >> Can >> someone help me out here? I wish my Coats line could be tested but we >> have >> not been able to locate a male Coats of this line that is willing to do >> so >> as of yet. Linda knows my story well. >> >> Steve Pearson >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "John Coats" <jwcoats@htc.net> >> To: <Coates-L@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:08 AM >> Subject: [COATES] Johns >> >> >> >>> Dear Group, Sorry if I mislead or confused anyone with my latest >>> posts. After looking at some old records, I see that John Sr. was >>> probably the son of John Gentleman Coats. At least that's what I got >>> from Linda Coate. If that is true, then the R1a1 group of Coatses is >>> separate from all those who descended from Gentleman John and Marmaduke >>> Coats. I didn't know John Sr. was a son of John Gent. That means my >>> James Robert, Charlotte's Rev Will, and Buster's Major John were an >>> altogether separate group. >>> >>> When I uploaded our R1a1 results to Nat Geo, they have us on the map >>> splitting off from those who continued up North and West and became the >>> Vikings. The map shows the M-17 group coming Southeast to the Russian >>> Steppes and becoming the Kurgan Culture. Of course that would have been >>> 10,000 years ago. Who knows where they left from to come to the US. My >>> guess is they migrated westward and came from Scotland, England or >>> Ireland. Best Regards, John W. Coats P.S. Linda, I'm still looking for >>> the papers of Gary Coates of Whitehall, Ill. I'll send them if and when >>> I find them. >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes >>> in the subject and the body of the message >>> >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > To contact the COATES list administrator, send an email to > COATES-admin@rootsweb.com. > > To post a message to the COATES mailing list, send an email to > COATES@rootsweb.com. > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > COATES-request@rootsweb.com > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body > of the > email with no additional text. > > > End of COATES Digest, Vol 4, Issue 45 > ************************************* >
John Coats wrote: Steve; John Henry told me you were having trouble. Linda sent me the story of John Coats Sr., saying he was the son of John Gent. She has the court records from the divorce proceedings. Looks like his son was Samuel. I think the DNA tests have cleared up a lot of misconception about the Coats line. I believe John Gent and Marmaduke were cousins, and probably were the Quakers. I believe our line is a totally different line, and may have been in NC instead of SC. Who know where they came from before that. If you could get someone to test, at least you could separate or connect with one of these. Good Luck, John > John, > > I used to think my John Coats of Miami Co., OH., who married Martha (Patsey) > Rudy was a Junior to a John Coats Senior, and I still think he may have been > a Jr., however the complete theory was that John Sr married a Susan Brock > supposed daughter of Elias and Ann (Hollingsworth) Brock and that his father > was Gentleman John Coats. I gave up on this theory due to a lack of > evidence that Gentleman John ever had a John that migrated to the Miami > Valley of OH. Also gave up the idea that a Susan Brock ever existed. I have > not seen a family group record of a Susan being a daughter of Elias and Ann > with supporting evidence other than this "theory". With that said, is it > possible this DNA study is reviving this theory of my Coats line once again? > What exactly is the story of this John who was a son of Gentleman John? Can > someone help me out here? I wish my Coats line could be tested but we have > not been able to locate a male Coats of this line that is willing to do so > as of yet. Linda knows my story well. > > Steve Pearson > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Coats" <jwcoats@htc.net> > To: <Coates-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:08 AM > Subject: [COATES] Johns > > > >> Dear Group, Sorry if I mislead or confused anyone with my latest >> posts. After looking at some old records, I see that John Sr. was >> probably the son of John Gentleman Coats. At least that's what I got >> from Linda Coate. If that is true, then the R1a1 group of Coatses is >> separate from all those who descended from Gentleman John and Marmaduke >> Coats. I didn't know John Sr. was a son of John Gent. That means my >> James Robert, Charlotte's Rev Will, and Buster's Major John were an >> altogether separate group. >> >> When I uploaded our R1a1 results to Nat Geo, they have us on the map >> splitting off from those who continued up North and West and became the >> Vikings. The map shows the M-17 group coming Southeast to the Russian >> Steppes and becoming the Kurgan Culture. Of course that would have been >> 10,000 years ago. Who knows where they left from to come to the US. My >> guess is they migrated westward and came from Scotland, England or >> Ireland. Best Regards, John W. Coats P.S. Linda, I'm still looking for >> the papers of Gary Coates of Whitehall, Ill. I'll send them if and when >> I find them. >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> >> > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to COATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >