Ruth I agree, I think we all would benefit all of us with the answers, some of us are shy in asking, or never thought of that question. So please give your answers to the list. Judy Lindley ----- Original Message ----- From: Norb & Ruth <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 8:19 AM Subject: Re: [Clooz] Tracking Negative Findings > I'm waiting for a response about tricks to recording negative findings. Is > it possible someone responded directly to Debra and not to the list? I get > frustrated when questions are posed and never answered. I have received some > wonderful "private" responses and really believe others would benefit. > Anyone else care to comment on this. > Ruth > -----Original Message----- > From: Debra Pettibone <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, November 26, 2000 11:55 AM > Subject: [Clooz] Tracking Negative Findings > > > >I'm a new user and have found the program great. But wondering how one > would use it to track negative research findings > > > >Say I look for a house hold in The 1850 Sumner Co. Census and they aren't > there. How would I incorporate this so that I don't duplicate my searches? > > > >Anyone out there have an idea? > > > >Thanks in advance, > >Debra > > > >______________________________ > >