At 06:04 PM 9/19/2006, you wrote: >I am a relatively new Clooz user, working with Clooz 2. I have been >generating printed reports for 1920 and 1930 census records for several >weeks now, and last night and today I have been trying unsuccessfully to >generate reports for 1870 US census records. Mike, this is a bug in Clooz 2.0. We have fixed it in 2.1, which I am really hoping to release by the end of October. So in the interim, you won't be able to print the 1870 US census report. But you will when 2.1 is released. Liz Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL @>---- Ancestor Detective, LLC http://www.ancestordetective.com Creator of Clooz, http://www.clooz.com Editor of Digital Genealogist, http://www.digitalgenealogist.com Editor of NGS NewsMagazine and UpFront, http://www.ngsgenealogy.org

Hi Liz Thanks for the response. I had a suspicion that it was a bug, when I still couldn't generate the report with a bare-minimum record. But I'm glad you already knew about it, because that greatly reduces the time until the fix is available. I'm really looking forward to seeing all of the reports in the next release. Hard-copy reports are truly the heart if not the soul of nearly any database application. Thanks again. Mike D. -----Original Message----- From: clooz-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:clooz-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:11 PM To: clooz@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [CLOOZ] Unable to generate US 1870 census report from Clooz 2 At 06:04 PM 9/19/2006, you wrote: >I am a relatively new Clooz user, working with Clooz 2. I have been >generating printed reports for 1920 and 1930 census records for several >weeks now, and last night and today I have been trying unsuccessfully to >generate reports for 1870 US census records. Mike, this is a bug in Clooz 2.0. We have fixed it in 2.1, which I am really hoping to release by the end of October. So in the interim, you won't be able to print the 1870 US census report. But you will when 2.1 is released. Liz Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL @>---- Ancestor Detective, LLC http://www.ancestordetective.com Creator of Clooz, http://www.clooz.com Editor of Digital Genealogist, http://www.digitalgenealogist.com Editor of NGS NewsMagazine and UpFront, http://www.ngsgenealogy.org ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CLOOZ-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Are you out there, Liz? I've just hit another question about a census report. This issue is so obvious that you are probably already aware of it, but I thought I would mention it just on the off chance that it hasn't been reported. I just printed a census report for a US 1860 census. In this particular record I have more than 10 linked people some of whom have single digit line numbers, and some of whom have double digit line numbers. The lines on the report printed out of numeric order. What I got was: 1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,2,22,23,7,8,9 Rather than: 1,2,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,22,23 So, has the line number field been established as an alphanumeric field as a matter of necessity? Will I always need to number all of my line numbers that are less than 10 as 01, 02, 03 etc. in order to get them to print properly on the report? And I haven't tried this in any of the other census years, because I haven't entered any other large groups of people in one record. Thanks Mike D. -----Original Message----- From: clooz-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:clooz-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:11 PM To: clooz@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [CLOOZ] Unable to generate US 1870 census report from Clooz 2 At 06:04 PM 9/19/2006, you wrote: >I am a relatively new Clooz user, working with Clooz 2. I have been >generating printed reports for 1920 and 1930 census records for several >weeks now, and last night and today I have been trying unsuccessfully to >generate reports for 1870 US census records. Mike, this is a bug in Clooz 2.0. We have fixed it in 2.1, which I am really hoping to release by the end of October. So in the interim, you won't be able to print the 1870 US census report. But you will when 2.1 is released. Liz Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL @>---- Ancestor Detective, LLC http://www.ancestordetective.com Creator of Clooz, http://www.clooz.com Editor of Digital Genealogist, http://www.digitalgenealogist.com Editor of NGS NewsMagazine and UpFront, http://www.ngsgenealogy.org ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CLOOZ-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Mike, yes the line number field is a text field and in order to get the line numbers to print in order, you need to put in 01, 02, etc. if you have more than 9 people. At 12:06 AM 9/20/2006, you wrote: >Are you out there, Liz? > >I've just hit another question about a census report. This issue is so >obvious that you are probably already aware of it, but I thought I would >mention it just on the off chance that it hasn't been reported. I just >printed a census report for a US 1860 census. In this particular record I >have more than 10 linked people some of whom have single digit line numbers, >and some of whom have double digit line numbers. The lines on the report >printed out of numeric order. What I got was: > >1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,2,22,23,7,8,9 > >Rather than: > >1,2,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,22,23 > >So, has the line number field been established as an alphanumeric field as a >matter of necessity? Will I always need to number all of my line numbers >that are less than 10 as 01, 02, 03 etc. in order to get them to print >properly on the report? And I haven't tried this in any of the other census >years, because I haven't entered any other large groups of people in one >record. > >Thanks >Mike D. > >-----Original Message----- >From: clooz-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:clooz-bounces@rootsweb.com] On >Behalf Of Elizabeth Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL >Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:11 PM >To: clooz@rootsweb.com >Subject: Re: [CLOOZ] Unable to generate US 1870 census report from Clooz 2 > >At 06:04 PM 9/19/2006, you wrote: > >I am a relatively new Clooz user, working with Clooz 2. I have been > >generating printed reports for 1920 and 1930 census records for several > >weeks now, and last night and today I have been trying unsuccessfully to > >generate reports for 1870 US census records. > >Mike, this is a bug in Clooz 2.0. We have fixed it in 2.1, which I am >really hoping to release by the end of October. So in the interim, >you won't be able to print the 1870 US census report. But you will >when 2.1 is released. > >Liz Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL @>---- >Ancestor Detective, LLC >http://www.ancestordetective.com >Creator of Clooz, http://www.clooz.com >Editor of Digital Genealogist, http://www.digitalgenealogist.com >Editor of NGS NewsMagazine and UpFront, http://www.ngsgenealogy.org > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >CLOOZ-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in >the subject and the body of the message > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >CLOOZ-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >quotes in the subject and the body of the message Liz Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL @>---- Ancestor Detective, LLC http://www.ancestordetective.com Creator of Clooz, http://www.clooz.com Editor of Digital Genealogist, http://www.digitalgenealogist.com Editor of NGS NewsMagazine and UpFront, http://www.ngsgenealogy.org