The answer Elizabeth provided was clear, concise and no "sucking eggs" as far as I could see. Perhaps you may care to elaborate more? Lance -----Original Message----- From: Phil Warn [mailto:philwarn@ntlworld.com] Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2005 2:40 AM To: Clooz-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [Clooz] People database Elizabeth, You may feel the need some time to review this answer. <vbg> It is not a very helpful answer to what I consider to be a very reasonable question. Your answer, smacks of granny sucking eggs, and looks remarkably patronising, even if that was not your intent. I will refrain from further comment, but ask that you re-consider your reply on another day. I hope you do not take umbrage at my view. Phil. At 14:22 25/11/2005, Elizabeth Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL wrote: >This is not a glitch. Each database in Clooz is a completely separate >database. If you had two different genealogy program databases, the >same thing would happen. That's why you keep different databases. If >you want all the numbers not to duplicate, you need to keep just one >database. This is how databases operate. ============================== View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find marriage announcements and more. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.8/183 - Release Date: 2005-11-25