>Betty, you haven't had to have Access since the very first version. >Since then you've always been able to use Clooz as a stand-alone. >Version 2 only has one option as it's not even written in Access. >Your databases are still Access databases, but you don't need to >have Access to use Clooz. It works on its own. > >At 01:53 AM 10/25/2006, you wrote: >>Hi Liz, >> >>I was among the first users of Clooz. As I recall at the outset we >>had a choice of selecting either Version 1, Stand Alone, or Version >>1, with Access 97. I am now up to Version 1.23 with Access 97 and >>thinking about upgrading to Version 2.0. Can I get a stand alone >>version of 2.0 or do I have to also have Access in order to upgrade >>and not lose any of my database? And if I have to have >>Access, what version of Access do I need today? >> >>Betty Boone >>bettyboone@san.rr.com > >Liz Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL @>---- >Ancestor Detective, LLC >http://www.ancestordetective.com >Creator of Clooz, http://www.clooz.com >Editor of Digital Genealogist, http://www.digitalgenealogist.com >Editor of NGS NewsMagazine and UpFront, http://www.ngsgenealogy.org

I have seen mention of Clooz 2.1 being in the works. At this point, is is planned that it will be free for those that have purchased version 2.0? Kathryn

At 12:16 PM 10/25/2006, you wrote: >I have seen mention of Clooz 2.1 being in the works. At this point, >is is planned that it will be free for those that have purchased version 2.0? Yes. We're calling it 2.1 because of all the reports that have been added, but it's the version that has been promised to those who purchase 2.0 and are expecting a CD. Those who ordered the download only will be able to download again and use the same serial number. There's no additional charge for 2.1. Liz Kelley Kerstens, CG, CGL @>---- Ancestor Detective, LLC http://www.ancestordetective.com Creator of Clooz, http://www.clooz.com Editor of Digital Genealogist, http://www.digitalgenealogist.com Editor of NGS NewsMagazine and UpFront, http://www.ngsgenealogy.org