Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Home

Results for list 'clarke'

Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [Clarke-Clark] Re: Benjamin Clarke, #581
    2. Joseph A Arlt

    3. Hi Susan... Thanks for the info... I don't know how the entries are written in "NEHGSR v 8, p 347 Early Records of Boston" regarding dates.... However, if its the "9th day of the 12th month of 1643", then translated into our present calender, that means: 9 Feb 1644........ [Since with the old style calender, Feburary was the last month (12th) of the year and the new year started in the end of March (on the 25th, I think..)] Let me know your thoughts... From Joe [email protected] Clearing House... Compulsive Genealogy Searcher, ARLT, CLARK, COSTELLO, COVERT, FALANGA, GUIDETTI, HIGGINS, KONEN, PARISI, RIDER, TOMPKINS, Van AUKEN & WAGNER On Sun, 06 Oct 2002 13:32:53 -0400 Susan Johanson <[email protected]> writes: > NEHGSR v 8, p 347 Early Records of Boston > > Under Dedham > > Benjamin son of Joseph and Allice Clark borne 9 (12) 1643 > > -- > -- > Susan C. Johanson, Springfield VA > http://worldconnect.genealogy.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=johanson > http://www.familytreemaker.com/users/j/o/h/Susan-C-Johanson/ > ...Searching for footprints in the sands of time... > > > > > ==== CLARKE Mailing List ==== > CLARKE Resources at RootsWeb - is your Clark-Clarke webpage linked > here? > http://resources.rootsweb.com/~clusters/surnames/c/l/CLARKE/ > List Manager's address [email protected] > > ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

    10/06/2002 01:28:21
    1. Re: [Clarke-Clark] Re: Benjamin Clarke, #581
    2. Susan Johanson

    3. Joe, The entries are written just as I typed them only with the numbers. Benjamin son of Joseph and Allice Clark borne 9 (12) 1643 You certainly may be right and his birthdate was Feb 9, 1644 based on our calendar today. I looked back through some of the other entries, and they are written in the same way with the middle number in parenthesis. Did they do this to distinguish between the numbers? Have you ever seen it done like this? The volumes come from the 1850s NEHGSR. Susan -- -- Susan C. Johanson, Springfield VA http://worldconnect.genealogy.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=johanson http://www.familytreemaker.com/users/j/o/h/Susan-C-Johanson/ ...Searching for footprints in the sands of time...

    10/07/2002 04:49:39