--WebTV-Mail-8685-224 Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit I agree with you Ken. Nothing more frustrating than recieving a reply without the question, or vice versa. Dan --WebTV-Mail-8685-224 Content-Disposition: Inline Content-Type: Message/RFC822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Received: from smtpin-102-4.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.55) by storefull-154.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtpin-102-4.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) id 18B3182; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: dan429@webtv.net Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.123]) by smtpin-102-4.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with ESMTP id 1BD342F3; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f5U3kEq14276; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:46:14 -0600 Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:46:14 -0600 X-Original-Sender: jokenot@earthlink.net Fri Jun 29 21:46:14 2001 Message-ID: <3B3D4DDB.D254F91F@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:56:11 -0700 From: Kenny Hedgpeth <jokenot@earthlink.net> Organization: Acts 1:8 aMessageBeyondAndToTheOuterMostParts X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Old-To: CLARKE-L@rootsweb.com, HALL-L@rootsweb.com, ELLIOTT-L@rootsweb.com, COBB-L@rootsweb.com, PALMER-l@rootsweb.com References: <MFMBM0056beUzmRf6Ci000005ae@mfmbm005.myfamilycorp.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [CLARKE] Reply back to the List PLEASE . . . <g> Resent-Message-ID: <hND0tC.A.0eD.GuUP7@lists5.rootsweb.com> To: CLARKE-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: CLARKE-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: CLARKE-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: <CLARKE-L@rootsweb.com> archive/latest/7082 X-Loop: CLARKE-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: CLARKE-L-request@rootsweb.com Greetings Folks ~ I hate to bring this up again . . . but I have read statements like these too many times TODAY, to let it go by any further . . . if it is of a personal nature, than ok . . . but these sound like they might have had info other's might have been interested in . . . "Please e mail me directly for more information" "Please contact me if you have a connection with this family" "Please contact me directly ......... " "Please let me hear from you if you are connected" "Anyone with any information contact me .........." "I would like to correspond with you if you think we connect" "You can contact me at ........ " "any information to share, I would appreciate hearing from you" "If you have any info Please contact me at ....... " "You can contact me directly ......... " "Could you please E-mail me at ....... " "I think I can help with ....... E-mail me at ........ " "Please send info to me at ....... " "Please email me at ........ ASAP!!" "Please email me and I can send you some ........ family history" Could we ALL, respond to the List first with your data and then we are all enriched. who knows . . . you just might be helping someone else also . . . <g> I am a BIG supporter of these rootsweb mailing List being set with the reply back to the List ! If we all see the question or statement, why not the answer or rebuttals ? ? Ken Hedgpeth ~ Arcadia, CA ==== CLARKE Mailing List ==== GenConnect ~ Biography, have one? Post it at ~ http://genconnect.rootsweb.com/gc/FamilyAssoc/ClarkeBios List Manager's address CLARKE-admin@rootsweb.com --WebTV-Mail-8685-224--