Hello Shellie, In Goss' book, there is the following: Anolata, 316, 193, 243 Hotaka, 1005 r.c.Ho-ta-kah, 376 [R.C. 676], 1089, 1090 Note that the name spelled with hyphens and probably pronounced similat to your Ho-ta-ka was classified as a rejected Choctaw, r.c., but that the name without the hyphes and spelled exactly as yours with the hyphens was not a rejected Choctaw. The numbers behind each name are the page numbers where these names appear in the US Court records or, if there is an asterisk, in the Atopka board records. John Craven New Orleans