awe so it wasn't dan who made the mistake, it was another's assumption & misunderstanding of lumping many into one :) imagine that Thanks for clarifying Susan......I was wondering how the Chinese got brought into this, now it makes a bit of sense :) Alli ----- Original Message ----- From: "Susan Reynolds" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [CherokeeGene] Leavens in Kentucky, born 1828 >I see the misunderstanding on the "Chinese" issue. The new DNA > standards show Native Americans as Asian, ie they originated in Asia, > but are not necessarily Chinese. There are many other groups on the > Asian continent and islands: Mongols, Indians (from India), Japanese, > etc. The Chinese are the more numerous, so we often think of Asians > as Chinese. > > Susan > =====*NOTICE THIS*===== > Cherokee genealogy; topic specific certain conversation is allowed to do > genealogy; and sort fact from (fiction). > > Rude people will be moderated asap! > List archive > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index?list=cherokeegene > please take non genealogy to [email protected] > Dual admin. > Dan and Joyce > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message