On 05/04/2016 10:25 PM, Alli via wrote: > I agree Adiene.... > > And chatting is about talking about the hows, whys, wheres & > whos........that's how you can gain more info. Since this was the suggestion in the opening of the chat. What is the confusion your agreeing to? The chat was opened as a generic session to create some loose conversation and let people have some relax time to enjoy the rest of each other as members. Also, I have a Yahoo group, thats not been used in a long time, called genealogy chat, would be a great place to get on with talking about the how too's of genealogy. From how to do it to what counties and states had changes from county names and sizes and years or what states because from what territories and when. How did NA people get Names not NA and when. Some times people have lots of questions that are not really a part of this group. For the next few days, all these questions are allowed in the genealogy chat. Maybe also people might like to learn, that in the early days of the NA populations there was quite a history going on in the world. From geology and most other ology topics this was a new world - or so the new people that came to it, thought at the times. One other note here- what a lot of people do not realize - in the first times of the migrations, much of the Americas in certain areas, like Mont, Wyo, Oregon desert just a suggestion of area's, * were tropical back 10,000 years or more** What we see and live in today, is not what they saw and lived in then. So, those artifacts found say on the desert now, was a lush tropics then. With ground rumpling and volcanoes popping off and people getting buried alive and lakes and lands suddenly changing from what it was to vast lands of lava and dust and panic. Not to make mention of glacier melts causing giant lakes to dump out and tear accross the lands in giant waves and cutting canyons and erasing mountains and washing people into the sea, look up the glacier lake topic about Missoula flood and glacier lakes. People who came here, was not just one migration, a good study about those you feel related to, follow the history backwards, who knows who was here so long ago. Studies are finding lots of newer evidence its always changing. People were crossing the seas long before we even thought they could. Anceint times and studies are proving more and more, early people were not stupid cave dwellers holding a club and a rock. ;) For years, studies have been showing the people here, have Asian blood. Interesting idea there, why did the Asians come here? Thats another long story. This group was set up for the modern genealogy, from newer migrations getting involved with the people already here. For the recent studies the proof has been found there were more than one migration and those early ones did not survive. The latter migrations as we know as the NA, is a very interesting study across the board and so many websites try to put in their 2 cents. This is exactly that, a time for people to post their 2 cents, how did your family become ( part NA ) and part some thing else? Some place in time, one family of migrations met the earlier families, and became another line of mixed bloods. I found I have Cherokee ancestry, my wife found she has Sioux . * How did * your* as in any ones- peoples become who you are today. Did any one do a DNA and what was found? Maybe some of those finds, lines, were early migraters? * Chat - lets see what can be shared in one week. Maybe, we can extend it.;) Here is another light topic - has any one else studied the stone near Los Lunas AZ with the early writing of the ten commandments on it? It dates back a long ways, some people say - maybe some of the lost tribes came here. Lots of websites on these topics. Look things up and post them and links. Beats looking at a quite list ;) List dad. *

I wasn't agreeing to any confusion :) On 5/5/2016 9:07 AM, James via wrote: > Since this was the suggestion in the opening of the chat. > What is the confusion your agreeing to? > >