Do we have any "current" dna/genetic or ancient people discovery's or has nothing new happened in the last 3+ years? On 4/10/2016 8:32 AM, Joy King via wrote: > http://blogs.plos.org/dnascience/2013/08/15/is-the-havasupai-indian-case-a-fairy-tale/

https://nativeheritageproject.com/2016/02/05/further-analysis-of-native-amer ican-dna-haplogroup-c-planned/ https://nativeheritageproject.com/2016/01/28/native-american-haplogroup-x2a- solutrean-hebrew-or-beringian/ -----Original Message----- From: cherokeegene-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:cherokeegene-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Alli via Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:40 PM To: cherokeegene@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [CherokeeGene] Is the Havasupai Indian Case a Fairy Tale? Do we have any "current" dna/genetic or ancient people discovery's or has nothing new happened in the last 3+ years?

Those were interesting links. here's a few that i found, some pretty interesting & helpful info on explaining the tests & what to look for https://dna-explained.com/2014/02/13/clovis-people-are-native-americans-and-from-asia-not-europe/ https://dna-explained.com/2013/10/25/ancestor-of-native-americans-in-asia-was-30-western-eurasian/ https://dna-explained.com/2014/10/21/peopling-of-europe-2014-identifying-the-ghost-population/ http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v506/n7487/full/nature13025.html https://dna-explained.com/2013/07/10/5500-year-old-grandmother-found-using-dna/ https://dna-explained.com/2013/07/04/ancient-dna-analysis-from-canada/ https://nativeheritageproject.com/category/cherokee/ On 4/10/2016 1:26 PM, Joy King wrote: > https://nativeheritageproject.com/2016/02/05/further-analysis-of-native-amer > ican-dna-haplogroup-c-planned/ > > https://nativeheritageproject.com/2016/01/28/native-american-haplogroup-x2a- > solutrean-hebrew-or-beringian/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: cherokeegene-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:cherokeegene-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Alli via > Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:40 PM > To: cherokeegene@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [CherokeeGene] Is the Havasupai Indian Case a Fairy Tale? > > Do we have any "current" dna/genetic or ancient people discovery's or has > nothing new happened in the last 3+ years? > >

I forgot to change it in my posts. Nice to have it reflect the topic. *

Some folks dont know how to fix your broken links, please use the ( insert hyperlink* if you cant make them work like others. thanks * On 04/10/2016 12:26 PM, Joy King via wrote: > https://nativeheritageproject.com/2016/02/05/further-analysis-of-native-amer > ican-dna-haplogroup-c-planned/ > > https://nativeheritageproject.com/2016/01/28/native-american-haplogroup-x2a- > solutrean-hebrew-or-beringian/

http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091105/full/news.2009.1058.html just sayin;) * On 04/10/2016 12:26 PM, Joy King via wrote: > https://nativeheritageproject.com/2016/02/05/further-analysis-of-native-amer > ican-dna-haplogroup-c-planned/ > > https://nativeheritageproject.com/2016/01/28/native-american-haplogroup-x2a- > solutrean-hebrew-or-beringian/

very interesting............even though it was back in 2009, still cool On 4/14/2016 4:06 PM, James via wrote: > http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091105/full/news.2009.1058.html > just sayin;) > * >

So many choices and opinions in the science world. So many people read * old web pages* thinking it is still a fact, but, no it was just on the way of finding the way to more details, as time goes on, things we thing we think are-were facts become a mere note on the wall. People write an error - lets say in ancestry.com tree's - another comes along and claims the notes as a fact and the previous gets corrections and the latter never changes - thus - 99 bottles of beer on the wall wont unleash the confusion added by miss use of facts. Here is a discussion some one might read it and get into the bash. http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/39990/title/Ancient-Skeleton-Sheds-Light-on-Native-American-Roots/ Once we were sitting on proof to 14.300, now they are claiming maybe 26,000 for the NA's I dont have any special opinions, I just read, like any one else and do like any one else, ( oh, thats a fact- whoops, tomorrow I find thats not right any more) So the best thing is, dont insist on what some thinks they know, there is always change and always new finds in facts lead to more finds in facts. For all the people doing research of those NA people intermarriages over time, good searching will provide answers. 99% of what I have read personally, relates the NA's as Asian cultures. You can debate, debunk and dispute, as you wish but be sure- as you do you use known facts. *