As many on this list may remember my trying to find Wallace. He has been found, but now there are other questions yet to be answered. Wallace first married Mabel (do not know her maiden name). They were found on the 1920 census in Little Rock Ark., county of Pulaski, Big Rock Township. Apparently Mabel owned a hotel there and Wallace is listed as, husband and manager, Mabel of course was listed as head. When I found the obit for Wallace, it states that he had the following relatives. William F. B. Chase and Charles F. Chase (assume these are his two sons). Also listed is a Mrs. Grace Schmeizer of Little Rock. Not sure what relation she may have been. At the time of Wallace's death, he was married to Mamie(Smith), my g-grandmother. My question is: Would anyone know of this family and who Mabel may have been before she married Wallace ? Also, found the cemetery where Wallace is buried (per the obit), which is Pinecrest-Memorial Park and Garden Mausoleum Inc., between Little Rock and Bryant on Hwy 5. In the same cemetery are those listed below. Would anyone be able to tell me about them? If they are related, and their deaths having been not so long ago, perhaps someone out there may know something pertaining to Wallace and Mabel and their family. George E. Chase d/27 Oct. 1997 Lewis F. Chase d/18 Jan. 1999 Mabel Chase d/19 June 1946 Mary M. Chase d/28 March 2002 Ruth P. Chase d/18 Jan. 1999 Thank you, Leta leta.sheaffer@verizon.net

Hi,Roberta, Firstly I am in England so American law is somewhat different to ours. The problem may be that the data was put on their web site either by a member of the Chase list,( I did give a cd with the gedcom on it to some mebers). Alternatively it may have been given by the owner of the Server of the Chase site. I do not believe we can stop familytree.com and Ancestry.com from using the data and selling. I may be wrong. I am trying to contact Dennis Partridge who owns both the Surnameweb and Genealogy surnames site. I need to search my own archies to find what the Site address was immediately after the big crash on Surnameweb. It is unfortunate that I had an accident and dropped my 3 backup portable Hard Drives on the floor and only one now works. One of the other 2 I used only for video and film editing. To add to my woes I have some people who have asked to have details of living relatives removed. At this time I am unable to access the site to alter or remove data. Please bear with me as I have so many things going on at this time as I am expecting my Aussie cousins here in a week's time Keith Hume ----- Original Message ----- From: Roberta Williams To: k.hume3@ntlworld.com Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 3:12 AM Subject: re:exploitation of Chase philantropy Mr. Hume; is there a way to organize Chase family members who feel exploited or violated by Chase.familytreeguide.com and get an injuntion to prevent them from distributing this personal information for profit? I'd be interested and willing to help. Im one of a few up here in Maine that digs and helps others voluntarily and I'd hate to think others might be exploiting that information-and hard to believe they are Chases at all. Sincerely Bertie LaGrange, ME ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com

Hi,Charlie, You are right . I worded the query badly. What i meant to ask was if I was descended from a CHASE female is there any way of proofing this with any form of DNA test? Sorry to be so ambiguous before Keith ----- Original Message ----- From: <ChaseDNAteam@aol.com> To: <chase@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 3:00 AM Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test > > In a message dated 8/26/2006 5:36:38 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > k.hume3@ntlworld.com writes: > > Thanks Charlie, > Have I got this right? > There is no way a DNA test can prove/disprove a link with a member the > CHASE > families either male or female? > > > Keith, I am not sure I understand your question, but I will try to > answer: > > Prove is a very strong word! On the Y-Chromosome DNA test the results > show > with a certain degree of probability of having a common ancestor with the > other individual test takers. For instance, if you match someone on 24 or > 25 out > of 25 markers the probability of having a common ancestor with the person > you > matched might be a 99% probability of having a common ancestor within the > last (X) number of generations. Does the results prove who is the common > ancestor--no, but it could put you on the right track if you are looking > for > additional ancestors. > > Let me give you another example: My wife's Great Grandmother was a Clark. > She lived in Salem, Indiana about 30 miles from Clarksville, Indiana. > Family > stories had always said that her line of Clarks were cousins of the > famous > brothers: William (The Explorer) Clark and George Rogers Clark. I have > one > generation that I cannot prove to connect the two lines. I looked at the > Clark DNA > site and out of over 100 test takers there was only one test taker > claiming > to be a descendant of William Clark the explorer. (Lewis and Clark > Expedition) > > We found a male descendant (with the Clark surname) from my wife's Clark > line to take the DNA test. He matched the person claiming to be a William > Clark's descendant 24/25 markers. The probability of having a common > ancestor was > listed as 99%. Did this prove who the common ancestor was--no. Did it > prove > our theory, that we tested by taking the DNA test. I believe it did. So > now, we > know that my wife's ancestor was kin to the famous duo--we just need to > find > out how! > > If your results only match 20/25 your probability would be 0% of having a > common ancestor. > > Sorry to be long winded--I hope I answered your question. > > Charlie Scott > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

heritageseeker, What do you know about the "Cheerie Chase Club for the Blind"? -Grant __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

January 1917 issue of the Chase Chronicle INTERMENTS: NOT SURE OF PLACE OF BURIALS ISAAC CHASE, Son of Daniel and Martha Kimball. Feb. 27, 1786. about 98. (Scrofulous sores.) Born in West Newbury. HANNAH (Berry) CHASE, Wife of Isaac Chase. May 6, 1771. aged about 83. “She lived with her husband above 60 years and hath left of her posterity above 90 children and grand children, and great grand children; the last being 25 children.” "She died with a cancer." VANDALISM Next to stealing a corpse is the crime of stealing a grave stone. It's too late now to prosecute the men who stole the stones from ISAAC CHASE’S private yard. He gave an acre near his home on the Blackstone River for a grave yard for his own family and his neighbors. A few years ago, we were trying to locate the resting place of Isaac and his family. We found the lot from his deed and his will. But we could find no grave stones or graves. A lot of cows were feeding on the lot. An old man living nearby said the bodies were there but all the stones were carried off years ago when they were building a new mill on the river. They were "awful short" of flat stones the old man said, so they took all the stones from Mr. Chase's yard and they "came in very handy." Mr. Chase and his family had all died or moved away, and the stones were deliberately stolen and put into the mill. This is not so very strange. A few years ago the writer was trying to get facts concerning some old families in a town in Essex County, Mass. He made no headway, but he found a live man smoking his pipe nearby. Upon inquiry he found that a few years before some enterprising landscape artist took the job to beautify the old cemetery. He laid it out like an amphitheatre, gently rising from the street, putting the taller stones at the rear and making aisles as he pleased. In carrying out this regeneration he plowed up much of the land, and very piously put all the upturned bones into a big dry goods box and sunk the box and covered it in a lower corner of the yard where it would be "safe." Then arranging the stones according to size and color, there were very few bodies anywhere near where they first were buried; but as the native said he was good enough to save most of the stones, but if they were broken or would not fit into his scheme he piled them up nearby in the back part of the yard and there they are. This is simply damnable, but it's true. This is just as bad as it is to steal a corpse.

Hi Kathy, Did Isaac die of both scrofula (a disease of the neck tissue) and tuberculosis (a disease of lung tissue)? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kathleen Caslin" <kathyc_7@msn.com> To: <chase@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 4:49 AM Subject: Re: [CHASE] Lt. Nathaniel Chase > Hi James, > > I am a decesdant of Isaac Chase through his son Henry...who was the uncle > of your Nathaniel! My Henry moved to Petersham and then to Vermont from > Sutton/ Millbury and that was where my Chase line is from. > > Nice to meet you cousin!! > > The Worcester Library has a great section on Genealogy. It was in the > registers of the Daughters of the American Revolution in the library that > I > found the information about Henry's service in the revolution. You will > find > Nathaniels there. Check with a local chapter of the DAR or the Worcester > library. > > It was also in the Worcester Library that I found the information that > stated that Isacc died of scrofula...tuberculosis...and that Hannah Berry, > his wife...died of "a lump in the breast". I found it interesting to find > an 18th century ancestor who died of breast cancer...since there is an > issue > with it in the females in my family today. > > Lonnie Chase who is also on this list is also a decesdant of Isaac. > > Kathy Caslin kathyc_7@msn.com > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >

Hi James, I am a decesdant of Isaac Chase through his son Henry...who was the uncle of your Nathaniel! My Henry moved to Petersham and then to Vermont from Sutton/ Millbury and that was where my Chase line is from. Nice to meet you cousin!! The Worcester Library has a great section on Genealogy. It was in the registers of the Daughters of the American Revolution in the library that I found the information about Henry's service in the revolution. You will find Nathaniels there. Check with a local chapter of the DAR or the Worcester library. It was also in the Worcester Library that I found the information that stated that Isacc died of scrofula...tuberculosis...and that Hannah Berry, his wife...died of "a lump in the breast". I found it interesting to find an 18th century ancestor who died of breast cancer...since there is an issue with it in the females in my family today. Lonnie Chase who is also on this list is also a decesdant of Isaac. Kathy Caslin kathyc_7@msn.com

This Dudley Chase mentioned in regards to Almira Chase could prove that my line goes back to Thomas Chase.

Looking for information about Almira Chase born 1819 Oswego NY. She married Hiram Comstock in Mexico Oswego in 1841. They had a daughter born March 31 1855 Port Ontario Oswego NY her name was Valentia Elizabeth Comstock. They lived in Dodge County MN. Almira died Feb 25 1903 at Dodge Centre Dodge county MN. Her father was Dudley Chase. She may have had a brother named Levi Chase. Looking for anything that may help me determine if Almira was indeed Levi Chase,s sister. Regards Russ Chase

Thanks,Dick, That does clarify the issue Keith ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Chase" <rachase@triad.rr.com> To: <chase@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 7:49 PM Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test > Keith -- I may have inadvertently implied that, but the correct answer is > "no". In fact, since we are dealing with the probabilities associated > with > the random mutations of markers over time (number of generations), there > is > no "certainty" in the comparison of any test results from two or more > individuals. The number of markers there are to compare (i.e., 12 -- 25 -- > 37 -- etc.) and the number of matches, and genetic "distance" of > non-matches > are the basis for the calculated probability of a common ancestor with > each > generation back from the one of the individuals tested. And actually, the > probability of a common ancestor actually increases the further back you > go > (greater number of generations since the common ancestor). This is because > the more intervening generations there between the common ancestor and the > present, the greater the likelihood there is that there will have been > mutations in markers resulting in the present day non-matches in the tests > of the two individuals we are comparing. > > > > Dick > > -----Original Message----- > From: chase-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:chase-bounces@rootsweb.com] On > Behalf Of Keith Hume > Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 5:16 AM > To: chase@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test > > > > Hi,Dick, > > That is good news however are you saying that more than 6 generations is > > accurate in EVERY case? > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

In a message dated 8/26/2006 5:36:38 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, k.hume3@ntlworld.com writes: Thanks Charlie, Have I got this right? There is no way a DNA test can prove/disprove a link with a member the CHASE families either male or female? Keith, I am not sure I understand your question, but I will try to answer: Prove is a very strong word! On the Y-Chromosome DNA test the results show with a certain degree of probability of having a common ancestor with the other individual test takers. For instance, if you match someone on 24 or 25 out of 25 markers the probability of having a common ancestor with the person you matched might be a 99% probability of having a common ancestor within the last (X) number of generations. Does the results prove who is the common ancestor--no, but it could put you on the right track if you are looking for additional ancestors. Let me give you another example: My wife's Great Grandmother was a Clark. She lived in Salem, Indiana about 30 miles from Clarksville, Indiana. Family stories had always said that her line of Clarks were cousins of the famous brothers: William (The Explorer) Clark and George Rogers Clark. I have one generation that I cannot prove to connect the two lines. I looked at the Clark DNA site and out of over 100 test takers there was only one test taker claiming to be a descendant of William Clark the explorer. (Lewis and Clark Expedition) We found a male descendant (with the Clark surname) from my wife's Clark line to take the DNA test. He matched the person claiming to be a William Clark's descendant 24/25 markers. The probability of having a common ancestor was listed as 99%. Did this prove who the common ancestor was--no. Did it prove our theory, that we tested by taking the DNA test. I believe it did. So now, we know that my wife's ancestor was kin to the famous duo--we just need to find out how! If your results only match 20/25 your probability would be 0% of having a common ancestor. Sorry to be long winded--I hope I answered your question. Charlie Scott

Hi,Dick, Claudia was of enormous assistance to me and we visited her home in Barrie Ontario and undertook a 2,500 journey to our ancestors sites. You are right about the transfer to a new server but you will doubrless have seen the fuss this has caused with the database, I continue to try and contact Dennis Partridge but so far no luck. perhaps he is on holiday Keith ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek Chase" <chasede@nbnet.nb.ca> To: <chase@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test > Keith > > Yes you will remember Claudia MacArthur-Hume had provided some genealogy > information to us back in the 90's I believe and I think a good portion of > it is on the CHASE database site... > > There have been a lot of changes in the site, such as the "search" and > opening pages...I guess this moved to a new server <?> > > As to the DNA I think it is more or less an indicator of being on the > correct "track" as it were in one's research, but it is not an end in > itself. I think the object is still to "prove" your own lineage as > accurately as possible, but the DNA matching provides a search area. > > Derek > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Hume" <k.hume3@ntlworld.com> > To: <chase@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 6:27 AM > Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test > > >> Dick, >> I did not realise or probably forgot that you and I were both descendants >> of James P. Chase. >> I have powerful evidence that my Hume ancestor Peter married his daughter >> ,Sarah, in what is now New Brunswick and indeed some years ago I visited >> the >> site of Peter's first and later Land Grants >> The difference between you descent is I James P. was my 3 times Great >> Grandfather. The reason for this is my grandfather was born in 1835 near >> Baddeck,( This in a 100 year old letter written by him) and my Dad was >> born >> in 1890 with me being born in 1930. >> If I have no luck getting Dennis partridge I am prepared to put the data >> on >> another website but with an increse in interest I would prefer to leave >> it >> where it is at present. >> Keith >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Derek Chase" <chasede@nbnet.nb.ca> >> To: <chase@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:09 PM >> Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test >> >> >>> Yeah ... agreed. >>> >>> I have completed my linkages to join up with the William line, being >>> Capt. >>> George Bedford Chase, who had James P. Chase(my 5th g grandfather) the >>> Loyalist who settled here . That is why i enquired as to who was >>> handling >>> the DNA page update. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Richard Chase" <rachase@triad.rr.com> >>> To: <chase@rootsweb.com> >>> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 6:58 PM >>> Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test >>> >>> >>>> Keith -- The Y chromosome dna does tend to mutate over a number of >>>> generations, that is, the value of an individual allele (or marker) can >>>> change between two generations. But I think that the test results that >>>> we >>>> have for the CHASE individuals who have taken the 25 marker test rather >>>> clearly show that 6 generations is not a limit for valid comparisons. >>>> In >>>> both the Aquila and William lines there are very close matches for >>>> individuals who are 10 generations removed from the known common >>>> ancestor. >>>> >>>> Dick Chase >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: chase-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:chase-bounces@rootsweb.com] On >>>> Behalf Of Keith Hume >>>> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 3:05 PM >>>> To: chase@rootsweb.com >>>> Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test >>>> >>>> Hi,Charlie, >>>> This gets more and more intriguing!. >>>> Am I right in thinking that her connections are all on the female Chase >>>> line >>>> >>>> as I understand that is the only way this test can be relavent. >>>> Also about 18 months ago I was looking at some articles on DNA testing >>>> and >>>> read that from 6 generations back , using the "male" test you could not >>>> rely >>>> >>>> on the data due to minor mutations. >>>> Do you or anyone on the list know anything about this? >>>> Keith Hume >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: <ChaseDNAteam@aol.com> >>>> To: <chase@rootsweb.com> >>>> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:24 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test >>>> >>>> >>>>> To: Chase Group >>>>> >>>>> Today we had one of the test takers, who matches the William Chase >>>>> descendants, upgrade from 12 to 37 markers. As we build a base at 37 >>>>> markers we might >>>>> start seeing a difference in the results. If this happens, it could >>>>> show >>>>> a >>>>> difference for the children of William or at some generation. We won't >>>>> know >>>>> until we get some results back. This is also an idea for the Aquila >>>>> descendants. >>>>> >>>>> The basic 12 marker test shows if you have a common ancestor with >>>>> those >>>>> with >>>>> proven research. For some, this might be all you need. For those of >>>>> you >>>>> who >>>>> are still trying to prove your research, this is an additional tool. >>>>> (Upgrades: 12 to 25 or 25-37 = $49; 12 to 37 =$99) >>>>> >>>>> We also have, I think, our first Chase female doing the mtDNA test >>>>> ($129). >>>> >>>>> I >>>>> admit, I know very little about the mtDNA test and how to read the >>>>> results. I >>>>> guess we will learn together. >>>>> >>>>> Charlie Scott >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>>> CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>>> quotes >>>>> in the subject and the body of the message >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>> CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>> quotes >>>> in >>>> the subject and the body of the message >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>> CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>> quotes >>>> in the subject and the body of the message >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes >>> in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

Joyce: He may have been a LT. in the Militia after the war in the town where he lived. Ginger

I really don't know much about my Chase line. Maybe someone can tell me where I fit. My gr-gr-grandmother was Mary Chase. b abt 1832. Her sisters were Almira (married Merrick) and Sarah b 1835 (married Bell). Mary Married Newton Colby and is buried in Nunda, NY. The girls went to school in Nunda. I believe her parents may have been Levi and Elizabeth Chase. Elizabeth is buried in Nunda. Also buried in Nunda is Sarah, wife of Moses Chase d. July 1868. There are probably more Chase burials there, however the records were lost in a fire. I think the Chase family is from New Hampshire as is the Colbys. Colbys came onto Maine in 1630 then to NH.

ChaseDNAteam@aol.com wrote Betty, it would probably be a waste of money! What I recommend is to list the names, locations lived, and name of spouse of your earliest known Chase ancestor and see if any of the group knows anything about your line. Charlie Scott *** Since I am female and my father the last male Chase I am researching DNA is of no help.This is my earliest Chase, if someone can make a connection it would be most welcome. I have several ideas but have found no connections. James Chase b. 1 Oct 1796 in NY (maybe Albany Co.) d. 8 Oct 1869 in LeRoy, Genesse, New York married about 1824 to Rebecca Winne b. 19 Feb 1803 in Guilden/Guilderland, New York. Familysearch.org has a son Nicholas Chase, parents James Chase and Rebecca Winne birth 14 Sep 1828 christening 20 Jan 1828, Presbyterian, New Scotland, Albany, New York. (No, I didn't type it wrong that's what it states.) 1850 Grove, Allegeny, NY census shows James Chace and wife Rebecca with children: Elizabeth - 1825 -aft 1880 census m1 Ebenezer Lawrence, m2 Plumley Strouts Alida Jane - 19 Nov 1829 Grove, Allegeny, NY 1 Apr 1903 NY m James Lawrence Emiline - 1834 Grove, Allegeny, NY 10 Feb 1874 m.William Harris Mary - 1836 ("died young") James Henry - 17 June 1840 Grove, Allegany, New York 28 May 1882 Pavilion, NY m. Jane Elizabeth Meldrum 1860 Pavilion, Genesse, NY census James H. is the only child at home. I have researched all the children in hopes of finding info on James and Rebecca but am still at a loss. Can someone PLEASE connect James to his parents I would be forever grateful. Betty Genealogy is my Hobby, I collect ancestors !

Keith -- I may have inadvertently implied that, but the correct answer is "no". In fact, since we are dealing with the probabilities associated with the random mutations of markers over time (number of generations), there is no "certainty" in the comparison of any test results from two or more individuals. The number of markers there are to compare (i.e., 12 -- 25 -- 37 -- etc.) and the number of matches, and genetic "distance" of non-matches are the basis for the calculated probability of a common ancestor with each generation back from the one of the individuals tested. And actually, the probability of a common ancestor actually increases the further back you go (greater number of generations since the common ancestor). This is because the more intervening generations there between the common ancestor and the present, the greater the likelihood there is that there will have been mutations in markers resulting in the present day non-matches in the tests of the two individuals we are comparing. Dick -----Original Message----- From: chase-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:chase-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Keith Hume Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 5:16 AM To: chase@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [CHASE] DNA test Hi,Dick, That is good news however are you saying that more than 6 generations is accurate in EVERY case?

Hello James, Do you know who Nathaniel's wife was and when they got married? Cheers, Jeffrey On 8/25/06, James Klim <JKlim@massasoit.mass.edu> wrote: > > Hi all: I am researching one of my ancestors, Lt. Nathaniel Chase from > Grafton/Sutton Massachusetts B.1748. D.1826 Cattaraugus. County New > York. Son of Timothy, B. Jan 12th 1717/18 D. 1808 Royalton, > Massachusetts; son of Isaac, son of Daniel; son of Aquila Chase. I am a > member of the Robert Treat Paine chapter from Taunton Massachusetts > "Sons of the American Revolutionary war" I would like to honor my Chase > ancestors as I have honored my Sacketts and Edsons. If you can > > help with any records for any of my Chase ancestors that fought in the > Revolutionary War I would be thankful. > > > > Best Regards > > > > James R. Klim > > 18 Robins Street > > East Bridgewater, Ma-02333 > > > > James R. Klim/Supervisor > > Massasoit Community College > > Brockton, ma- 02302-3996 > > Tel: 1-508-588-9100 Ext 1181 > > Fax; 1-508-427-1220 > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > -- Jeffrey Chace http://www.chace.demon.nl

Thank you very much!!! Beverly Alexander ----- Original Message ----- From: <chase1858@hughes.net> To: <chase@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [CHASE] Aaron Chase 1767-1812 Lempster, NH (CHASE, STEVENS,MORRILL) > > > Source: " Seven Generations of The descendants of Aquila And Thomas Chase" > Compiled by John Carroll Chase and George Walter Chamberlain > > > CAPT. JONATHAN 4 CHASE (Daniel,3 Daniel2), born in Newburv > 1 Mar. 1732/3; died in Hopkinton, N. H., 6 Feb. 1815, aged 83. He > married 7 June 1760, SARAH STICKNEY, daughter of Col. Jeremiah > and Elizabeth (Carleton) Stickney of Concord. She was born in > Rumford (now Concord), 14 Oct. 1737, and died in Hopkinton, 10 > Mar. 1812, aged 74. > > Capt. Jonathan was at the battle of Bennington and the tak- > ing of Burgoyne. In 1755 he belonged to Col. Rogers's Rangers in > the French War. In an action with the Indians near Lake George > he noticed a large stump, through a hole in which shots were > being fired. He supposed the person behind the stump would na- > turally wish to know the result of his shot, so after a short > interval > after a shot he aimed his musket at the hole and discharged it and > a huge savage leaped into the air and fell dead. The Indians soon > retreated and as Mr. Chase passed the stump he snatched a large > wooden hominey spoon which hung to the Indian's side. The > spoon was carried home and is preserved as a family relic It is > now in possession of Dr. Leonard Chase of Springfield, Vt it is > a curious specimen of savage workmanship having the figure of an > Indian carved on the handle with a projection as a pedestal. He > was in a sitting posture and holding to his mouth a water bottle > > > The Gen. Assembly of N. H. 25 Jan. 1772, granted to Jona- > than Chase, Beech Island in Conn. river between Cornish and > Windsor. He commanded a Regiment at the surrender of Bur- > goyne and was active throughout the War of the Revolution. > (N. H. Hist. Coll. Vol. VII, pg. 72, 219, 223, 254, 263 and Adj. > Gen. Rep. Col. 11, 1866, pps. 306, 309, 330, 331;.. > > Children, born in Concord, N. H.: > > 316. SAMUEL,4 b. 10 Mar. 1761. > > 317. MOSES, b. 30 Oct. 1763. > > 318. AARON, b. 27 Oct. 1766. ************* > > 319. JEREMIAH STICKNEY, b. 27 May 1768. > > 320. CHARLES, b. 9 July 1770. > > 321. DANIEL, b. 13 Apr. 1772. > ************************************************ > >> >> I need any information on the parents and siblings of Aaron CHASE >> b. 1767, d. 27 May 1812 Lempster, Cheshire Co, NH (now Sullivan >> Co). He married on 25 Dec 1790 to Dorothy STEVENS. They had >> they following children: >> >> Joseph Philbrick Chase b. 5 Nov 1791 Lempster, d. 6 Feb 1881 >> Sutton, Merrimack Co, NH m. Sabrina MORRILL >> Lydia Chase b. 1793 >> Barak chase b. 1796 >> Daniel Chase b. 1799 >> Marriner Chase b. 1801 >> Nancy S. Chase b. 1804 >> Mary Chase b. 1807 >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CHASE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

I would like to add a comment on Lt. Nathaniel Chase, as follows: !MILITARY: DAR PATRIOT INDEX; ; Centennial Edition, Part 1, Washington, 1990; p 546; RVGS Library, Medford, OR. NOTE: Records Nathaniel as a Pvt in Patriotic Service, NH, MA (no military service). Gives baptism 2-8-1756 MA; died 12-18-26 NY; married (1) Rachel Pierce (2) Naomi Kelley. After years of research, I cannot find a reference to his being a Lt. However, this was apparently a likable man. Was it simply a "nickname" out of respect? Or has anyone found authentication for the Lt. address? Joyce Chase Jarvis Ashland, OR

Let me try and clarify this once and for all. 1) The original database used to be part of my site with surnameweb and entry to it was byself ONLY and the site owner 2) Some 2 years ago I was informed by the site owner that his server had crashed but some data had survived. ( Correspondence on this to the list may be in rootsweb archives) 3) This data with the exception of the Database was transferred to its current site by Surnameweb HOWEVER the Database was transfered to an entirely different site which I had access to for updating. 4) Since then there has been very little interest by anyone to add information,( I believe that 2 people asked but never took it forward) 5) To illustrate that this database has not been under my EXCLUSIVE CONTROL ie I had the only copy I would ask any member who has a copy to make this known to the list. 6) I have a copy of the database as it stood 5 years ago. If anyone wishes me to search it I am willing to do so until we can sort this mess out As the most injured party in this mess I feel agrieved that some suspicion has been cast upon me I have also taken issue with Ancestry.com for using data on my family which could only have originated with me. It may be well to remember that some list members have probably used the facility with such as Ancestry.com not realising that a situation such as this coulsd arise. If anyone has any further comments plese send to me as soon as possible Keith Hume ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lisa R. Martin" <lrmart@cfl.rr.com> To: "Keith Hume" <k.hume3@ntlworld.com> Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 3:57 AM Subject: Re: Unethical sharing of information > Hummm in the case that the list owner turned the info over to the site > then wouldn't all the info that was on your site be on this site? I gave > you my family info however this site doesn't have my family info on it. > Interesting..... Meg promised to keep me informed on what she finds out. > Oh by the way it says owner: K. Hume which Meg finds to hard to believe > that you would post such things. > I'm thinking it might have been submitted by another using your name or > they used your info and didn't change the owner name. > > We'll see > Lisa > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Hume" <k.hume3@ntlworld.com> > To: "Lisa R. Martin" <lrmart@cfl.rr.com> > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 3:39 PM > Subject: Re: Unethical sharing of information > > >>I have contacted Meg in the past. Please assure her I have NEVER given >>anyone permission to use any of the information for gain. >> I am STRONGLY opposed to this. >> I have to be careful as some 2 years ago I also was asked to pay by >> Ancestry.com for my info >> The problem is that I issued the Database and other data on a cd which >> raised money in the US for Charity. >> However I do not believe this is how the info got there. >> If you go to the Chase online DataBase, and make a query, you will >> probably end up on the Family TREE site. >> I repeat I never gave permission for this to happen and I am mortified if >> the list owner had anything to do with it for I knew him as a trustworthy >> fellow >> Keith >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Lisa R. Martin" <lrmart@cfl.rr.com> >> To: "KEITH HUME" <k.hume3@ntlworld.com> >> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:42 PM >> Subject: Fw: Unethical sharing of information >> >> >>> I'm forwarding this to you, in another of the letters she mentions your >>> name in such that she trusted you with her information. >>> >>> Lisa >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: <caned7937@mypacks.net> >>> To: <CHASE-L@rootsweb.com> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:38 PM >>> Subject: Unethical sharing of information >>> >>> >>>>I just found information on Chase.familytreeguide.com and they want me >>>>to pay $35.00 to access my family tree or download a gedcom. >>>> The information on the David Watkins family and my grandmother, Maria >>>> was used freely on the Chase website for free interchange of >>>> information. I am trying very hard to keep the information I have >>>> free. So I am upset and surprised to find information I shred with the >>>> Chase-L site on a money making site. >>>> Can you tell me what this is about? I am the only one that >>>> knows these facts. Who did this?.... I >>>> must admit to being upset. Meg Chase Stockwell >>>> PLease send your response to caned7937@mypacks.net >>>> >>>> I went back to the site again and found my name is published, my >>>> childrens names and my husbands, my sister and >>>> her son and husbands....all without my permission...all living. I >>>> deeply believed the Chase site to have an understanding that >>>> personal information was not to be shared and I >>>> trusted you all completely.. What is going on? All this on a paid >>>> site. >>>> What can be done if anything to keep privacy sacred. My mother is >>>> still living. All my personal >>>> comments are included on this site. All my years of work are included. >>>> I never thought any of you would be unethical. Meg >>>> >>>> Please respond to <caned7937@mypacks.net> >>>> >>> >