Good suggestions on including sources, Arleen, but you'll find that most of them are the materials you send in your response to my in inquiry. You give The 1883 Chandler book, and the Roxbury VR's, and the History of the First Church of Roxbury as sources of the Jan. 19 1641/42 death date, but attribute to two of the same sources the June 19 burial date. Five months between death and burial are difficult to accept. Savage, Vol. I, p. 359, says he was buried on January 24,1642. As to the variety of names for Annis, the Roxbury VR death notice calls her Annis; the Hist of the First Church of Roxbury refers to her as Hannah. Torrey has three listing for her marriages. In the one to William Chandler she is called Ann?/Annis?/Anmer?/Hannah [Alcock?], 1603-1683? In the entry for her marriage to John Dane she is called Agnes/Annis/Ann/Hannah (Bayford) CHANDLER. In the entry for her John Parmenter marriage she is Ann/Amis (Bayford) (Chandler) Dane. The History of Woodstock CT Genealogies is quoted as calling her Annis Hooker, sister of the Rev. Thomas Hooker and widow of George Alcock. Torrey does give a marriage of George Alcock and Anne Hooker, but says that she died either 1629, 1630, or 1631. The Virkus Compendium (a notoriusly unreliable source, but sometimes right) says the wife of William Chandler was Annie or Agnes Bayford daughter of Francis. Savage says she was Annis or Hannah (no surname given). The Article Genealogical Research in England, Ancestry of William Chandler of Roxbury, Mass. is perhaps the most reliable source of information, and it gives her name as Annis (or Agnes or Ann) daughter of Francis and Johan Bayford. It also gives four generations of Chandlers prior to William! Note: I have had her in my records for some 40 years Annis (Agnes) Bayford, but have been uncomfortable with all the other information floating around. Having just reviewed all this, I feel better! Bert