in the days of their removal they were deemed to be uncivilized and this is why they were moved ----- Original Message ----- From: Dusty <dustyc@microgear.net> To: <CHAHTA-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 5:02 PM Subject: Re: [CHAHTA] twinkies > I'm sorry, Patsy - I don't follow the question. Where have you seen the > term "Uncivilized tribes"??? > > dusty > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Patsy Caleb <studentarchaeologist@home.com> > To: <CHAHTA-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 6:17 PM > Subject: Re: [CHAHTA] twinkies > > > > Dusty are there any records on the acts and so called criminal acts that > the > > choctaws did to get classified as "Uncivilized" as itn in the 5 > uncivilized > > tribes" > > > > got to be there somewhere huh > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Dusty <dustyc@microgear.net> > > To: <CHAHTA-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 9:21 AM > > Subject: Re: [CHAHTA] twinkies > > > > > > > I use that joke with the children. They LOVE it! > > > > > > dusty > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Barbara Ellison <greybird7@pisp.net> > > > To: <CHAHTA-L@rootsweb.com> > > > Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 10:08 AM > > > Subject: Re: [CHAHTA] twinkies > > > > > > > > > > LOL :) > > > > That's why I often use the word Aboriginal...it's accurate and doesn't > > > > offend my own senses or anyone else's. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: <Chata1507@aol.com> > > > > To: <CHAHTA-L@rootsweb.com> > > > > Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 7:02 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [CHAHTA] twinkies > > > > > > > > > > > > > As many of my friends have commented we can be glad Columbus wasn't > > > > looking > > > > > for turkey. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== CHAHTA Mailing List ==== > > > > > Need more CHOCTAW information. Visit Rusty Lang's pages at > > > > http://www.choctaw-web.com for articles, censuses, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== CHAHTA Mailing List ==== > > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS LIST: > > > > Send msg. to CHAHTA-L-request@rootsweb.com > > > > Put "one" word in "body" of message:... "unsubscribe" without the > quotes > > > > Nothing in the subject line... Turn off signatures....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== CHAHTA Mailing List ==== > > > Got a GRIPE?? Got a PROBLEM?? Just wanna' WHINE? Don't post it to the > > list...write me, dusty (list administrator) at > > CHAHTA-L-admin@cultures.rootsweb.com > > > > > > > > > ==== CHAHTA Mailing List ==== > > To subscribe to CHOCTAW-SOUTHEAST-L Genealogy mail list: > > Send msg. to CHOCTAW-SOUTHEAST-L-request@rootsweb.com > > Put "one" word in "body" of message:... "subscribe" without the quotes > > Nothing in the subject line... Turn off signatures....... > > > > > ==== CHAHTA Mailing List ==== > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS LIST: > Send msg. to CHAHTA-L-request@rootsweb.com > Put "one" word in "body" of message:... "unsubscribe" without the quotes > Nothing in the subject line... Turn off signatures....... >
The Five Civilized Tribes (Choctaw-Cherokee-Creek-Seminole-Chickasaw) were called "civilized" by the government because they were not nomadic, lived in permanent communities, were amenable to European ideas and culture and had a representative, centralized form of government. They were removed to Indian Territory because they held the most desirable lands throughout the southeast, and without removing them beyond the Mississippi River, those lands could not be opened to encroaching white settlement. dusty
I saw a program on the history channel that is almost opposite to that. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dusty <dustyc@microgear.net> To: <CHAHTA-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 9:16 PM Subject: [CHAHTA] FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES > The Five Civilized Tribes (Choctaw-Cherokee-Creek-Seminole-Chickasaw) were > called "civilized" by the government because they were not nomadic, lived in > permanent communities, were amenable to European ideas and culture and had a > representative, centralized form of government. They were removed to Indian > Territory because they held the most desirable lands throughout the > southeast, and without removing them beyond the Mississippi River, those > lands could not be opened to encroaching white settlement. > > dusty > > > > ==== CHAHTA Mailing List ==== > Markie and Fay's CHOCTAW-SOUTHEAST Home Page: > http://freepages.cultures.rootsweb.com/~choctaw/ >
Now that would be an interesting one to watch. Do you recall the name? dusty ----- Original Message ----- From: Patsy Caleb <studentarchaeologist@home.com> To: <CHAHTA-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 11:50 PM Subject: Re: [CHAHTA] FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES > I saw a program on the history channel that is almost opposite to that. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Dusty <dustyc@microgear.net> > To: <CHAHTA-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 9:16 PM > Subject: [CHAHTA] FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES > > > > The Five Civilized Tribes (Choctaw-Cherokee-Creek-Seminole-Chickasaw) were > > called "civilized" by the government because they were not nomadic, lived > in > > permanent communities, were amenable to European ideas and culture and had > a > > representative, centralized form of government. They were removed to > Indian > > Territory because they held the most desirable lands throughout the > > southeast, and without removing them beyond the Mississippi River, those > > lands could not be opened to encroaching white settlement. > > > > dusty > > > > > > > > ==== CHAHTA Mailing List ==== > > Markie and Fay's CHOCTAW-SOUTHEAST Home Page: > > http://freepages.cultures.rootsweb.com/~choctaw/ > > > > > ==== CHAHTA Mailing List ==== > Choctaw Home Page: > http://freepages.cultures.rootsweb.com/~choctaw/ >