Hi All, I can confirm that I also experienced a similar problem about a month ago. At first I thought it was a quirk of my data, until I discovered that it had passed through several generations of GEDCOM exports and subsequent imports as I moved data around between databases. The problem was noticed when I read the GEDCOM into an external utility program, as the misplaced MARR tag caused some confusion in the program. After contacting the author of the program, he updated it to highlight such entries, and advised that the genealogy program he used checked for anomolies like this one. I do not think that CFTW created the problem, but it certainly passes it on. In my case the MARR tag occurred within the 0 @I individual records, not the 0 @F family ones. Ian Fettes Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Reply to: fettesi@st.net.au -----Original Message----- From: Gschneidinger Max <Max.Gschneidinger@ZP.SIEMENS.DE> To: CFT-WIN-L@rootsweb.com <CFT-WIN-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Tuesday, 14 July 1998 19:01 Subject: GEDCOM problem >GEDCOM export from CFTW (I use ver 2.31x) produces (and did the same in >older versions) a MARR line where it apparently shouldn't be. (I found out >because a Gedcom into HTML converter showed a warning concerning the MARR >tag and showed only part of the files)