Yes, Ira, good you do so. THAT'S the way to inovate and that's why your programm is so very fine and rich. (Perhaps new gedcom versions should try to meet more of the very good gen-programms - especially of the best: CFT.) Very happy, healthy and creative New Year to all! th. Ira J. Lund wrote: > .... Actually, the way I look at GEDCOM is that it > is a transfer media and should not constrict my program. If I program > something that GEDCOM can't handle then I feel that's GEDCOM's problem and > that I should not limit my program to meet only items that can be > transfered via GEDCOM. So I don't actually place that much importance on > GEDCOM. I program CFT-Win the way I feel it should be - then (after the > fact) try to fit it to GEDCOM for transfering of data. This is the case of > a RESI or ADDR tag allowing for individual AND family events.