If it's supposed to do that automatically, it's OK by me. I'm not complaining just questioning. At 22:22 05/06/01 -0500, you wrote: >Well, troops, at the risk of being non-conformist, I studied that format >quizzically when I first saw it, then decided that it was a logical >representation of the parenthetical offering of birth/death date and then >progressing to reading of the un-enclosed "married ddmmmyyyy" which segues >very nicely to the name of the person married to on the next line. >Really, I'm not an agitator. >Regards to all, >Floyd > >[SNIP] >> Subject: RE: [CFTW] Re:Decendant list [style2] >> >> >> Yes, that's exactly what I am getting too. >> (bd - dd ) marriage date >[SNIP] > > >==== CFT-WIN Mailing List ==== >You can contact the List Manager at: >[email protected] > >============================== >Visit Ancestry.com for a FREE 14-Day Trial and enjoy access to the #1 >Source for Family History Online. Go to: >http://www.ancestry.com/subscribe/subscribetrial1y.asp?sourcecode=F11HB > >