RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. [CASACRAM] Wanda M. (Smith) & Harold G. Davis
    2. This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/JW.2ADI/2217 Message Board Post: Wanda M. Davis, died March 17 1995. Harold G. Davis, died January 11 1999. I am hoping that someone may be able to help me. I have discovered that the Davis people listed above died in Sacramento. I have managed to trace this line from Scotland/Canada/Montana & Washington. I believe Wanda M. Davis was nee Smith. If someone can find an obit or any other snippet of information that would prove my suspicions, it would be very much appreciated. I think that I am very close to finding living relatives of my Smith family.

    09/08/2006 05:57:11
    1. Re: [CASACRAM] Wanda M. (Smith) & Harold G. Davis
    2. Nancy Pratt Melton
    3. I have a 1997 Sacramento Telephone Book and on page 79 there is listed: DAVIS, Harold G 601 Crocker Rd Hope this helps, Nancy Pratt Melton Golden Nugget Library http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~npmelton/index.html smithd@vaniercollege.qc.ca wrote: >This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > >Classification: Query > >Message Board URL: > >http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/JW.2ADI/2217 > >Message Board Post: > >Wanda M. Davis, died March 17 1995. >Harold G. Davis, died January 11 1999. >I am hoping that someone may be able to help me. I have discovered that the Davis people listed above died in Sacramento. I have managed to trace this line from Scotland/Canada/Montana & Washington. I believe Wanda M. Davis was nee Smith. >If someone can find an obit or any other snippet of information that would prove my suspicions, it would be very much appreciated. I think that I am very close to finding living relatives of my Smith family. > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CASACRAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >

    09/10/2006 04:30:06