Are you saying that William1 and William2 might be brothers? Anita -- "Bruce E. Carpenter" <carp@tezukayama-u.ac.jp> wrote: "and we may assume that William2 (b. ca. 1605), by virtue of being named with William1 in Shalbourne Westcourt tenant records, was his father's eldest son and heir." I think this is mistaken. The youngest was usually named in manor records, with the intention to maintain family claims to the land for the longest period of time. Clearly William (2) was the youngest. BC ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CARPENTER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _____________________________________________________________ Prices, software, charts & analysis. Click here to open your online FX trading account. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2111/fc/Ioyw6iifUxWPkwyOY5EBFwXePBzTCqBeCYag0HBUozEM23gmhLCIEf/