On Tue, 27 May 2003 17:44:47 -0400, Dan Walker wrote: > > Could someone send the url for her report I'd like to read it. > > Dan Walker This is it. http://www.globalgenealogy.com/Census/Sen70.htm Senator Milne stated: “The Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology has recommended that this bill be passed without amendment. I urge honourable senators to do exactly that and without delay.” They've won. Apparently on this list, we can write kudos for Parliamentarians who agree with our “party line” of this list, but cannot criticize those elected officials who don’t. It has been my impression that we are supposed to look up to "that person" as a standard-bearer of the genealogy community. I cannot do that. Nancy

I had nothing to do with de-listing anybody. However, it is unfair and unkind to continually berate Lorna Milne because her approach has not yet borne fruit. It would be just as unfair to continually berate me because Beatty et al v the Chief Statistician et al has not guaranteed the unconditional release of the 1911 census after all. There are limits to what a Liberal Senator can say and do. Maybe she should take a stand and refuse to sponsor this Bill any more. Maybe there is more she can do for us with the Bill in the House than she has been able to do for us so far. Her statements in the Senate raise questions. My interpretation is that she is sucking and blowing at the same time - a rare talent. Pointed remarks can be made without flaming her or anyone else. Lois Sparling [email protected] wrote: >On Tue, 27 May 2003 17:44:47 -0400, Dan Walker wrote: > > > >>Could someone send the url for her report I'd like to read it. >> >>Dan Walker >> >> > >This is it. >http://www.globalgenealogy.com/Census/Sen70.htm >Senator Milne stated: "The Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology has recommended that this bill be passed >without amendment. I urge honourable senators to do exactly that and without delay." >They've won. > >Apparently on this list, we can write kudos for Parliamentarians who agree with our "party line" of this list, but cannot criticize those >elected officials who don't. It has been my impression that we are supposed to look up to "that person" as a standard-bearer of the >genealogy community. I cannot do that. >Nancy > > >==== CANADA-CENSUS-CAMPAIGN Mailing List ==== >How to unsubscribe from Digest Mode. Send a message to >[email protected] that contains >(in the Subject line and body of the message) the command >-- unsubscribe -- and no additional text. > > > >

sucking and blowing at the same time is not rare talent......Confucius say nonpossible Lois Sparling wrote: > I had nothing to do with de-listing anybody. However, it is unfair and > unkind to continually berate Lorna Milne because her approach has not > yet borne fruit. It would be just as unfair to continually berate me > because Beatty et al v the Chief Statistician et al has not guaranteed > the unconditional release of the 1911 census after all. There are > limits to what a Liberal Senator can say and do. Maybe she should take > a stand and refuse to sponsor this Bill any more. Maybe there is more > she can do for us with the Bill in the House than she has been able to > do for us so far. Her statements in the Senate raise questions. My > interpretation is that she is sucking and blowing at the same time - a > rare talent. Pointed remarks can be made without flaming her or anyone > else. > > Lois Sparling > > [email protected] wrote: > > >On Tue, 27 May 2003 17:44:47 -0400, Dan Walker wrote: > > > > > > > >>Could someone send the url for her report I'd like to read it. > >> > >>Dan Walker > >> > >> > > > >This is it. > >http://www.globalgenealogy.com/Census/Sen70.htm > >Senator Milne stated: "The Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology has recommended that this bill be passed > >without amendment. I urge honourable senators to do exactly that and without delay." > >They've won. > > > >Apparently on this list, we can write kudos for Parliamentarians who agree with our "party line" of this list, but cannot criticize those > >elected officials who don't. It has been my impression that we are supposed to look up to "that person" as a standard-bearer of the > >genealogy community. I cannot do that. > >Nancy > > > > > >==== CANADA-CENSUS-CAMPAIGN Mailing List ==== > >How to unsubscribe from Digest Mode. Send a message to > >[email protected] that contains > >(in the Subject line and body of the message) the command > >-- unsubscribe -- and no additional text. > > > > > > > > > > ==== CANADA-CENSUS-CAMPAIGN Mailing List ==== > Read Gordon A. Watts' column on Post 1901 Census issues at > http://globalgazette.net