Seeing as you are so familiar with the old system of money in GB, can you tell me what a "bob" was, my grandmother used that currency from 1900-1920 before she emigrated to Canada. Jane in Cooksville (Mississauga) Ontario, Canada ----- Original Message ----- From: Malcolm Moody <malcolm@archivecdbooks.ca> To: <can-ont-simcoe@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE] Measures & chains & acres,lumbermen and farmers > Hi Paul, > > Since we seem to be in "silly season": I suspect that Napoleon had > as much to do with the inauguration of the metric system as King > Henry 8(?) had to do with the length of the standard Imperial yard. > It just happened on his "watch." I will, however, stand up for the > metric system (even though I am and old ****, and was bought up on > the silly, and completely arbitrary, Imperial system of measurement. > > The exact measurement of each of the metric standards is now based > on some quite esoteric physical constant but they also approximate to > (and were originally derived from) a straightforward piece of > physical mensuration available to all. The meter, for instance, is > now based on the wavelength of a particular color of light, but in > practical terms 100 km equates to about one degree of arc (4 minutes > of rotation at the equator) at the earth's surface. The kilogram is > defined by a lump of some rare metal but it is very close to the > weight (actually mass, but lets not get into that) of a liter of pure > water. These two units, together with the second as a length of > time, are enough to derive all the other units of measurement we > need. (Fortunately the second was defined by the astronomers way > back and is related to the speed of rotation of the Earth so we don't > have to deal with Imperial and Metric seconds!) Using multiples of > ten means that we can define larger and smaller metric units by > simply moving the decimal point, without the need to remember 1760 > yards in a mile or 16 ounces in a pound, unless its' liquid when it's > 20 ounces, except if you live in the US that is when its ...... and > so on and so forth. > > When people in Canada decry the metric system i wonder how they > would have got on with Imperial currency if it hadn't been phased out > in the early 1800's. How about 240 cents to the dollar? How about > 12 cents to the dime? And a halfcrown instead of a quarter? (NB: > There was NO "crown"!) Still sound OK? Try working out an 8% and a > 6% tax in your head using 240 cent dollars. > > My only problem with the metric system is that I was bought up on > the Imperial system and when I look at a length it comes into my mind > in feet and inches, not in meters and centimeters - or I think it's > going to weigh so many pounds (not stones thank goodness) rather than > kilos - so I'm constantly doing mental arithmetic to convert into the > metric system to know how much I need, or how far I have to go. > > No, lets keep furlongs, poles, peks, barrels and stones and > hundredweights (112 lb. - of course!) in the history books where they > belong! > > And a Merry Christmas (Ooops! Sorry!) Happy Holiday to you all. :-) > > Malcolm > > Archive CD Books Canada Inc. > President: Malcolm Moody > PO Box 11 > Manotick > Ontario, K4M 1A2 > Canada. > (613) 692-2667 > WEB SITE: http://www.ArchiveCDBooks.ca > > On 23 Dec, 2007, at 3:02 AM, can-ont-simcoe-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:55:56 -0500 > > From: "Paul and Ruth Robins" <robins0379@rogers.com> > > Subject: Re: [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE] Measures & chains & acres, lumbermen and > > farmers > > To: <can-ont-simcoe@rootsweb.com> > > Message-ID: <200712221756.lBMHu0aA028749@mail.rootsweb.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > It was always my understanding, that it was NAPOLEON who > > commissioned the > > study which eventually became the metric standard. The metre became > > 1 / > > what-ever of the distance between the Equator, and the North Pole. > > > > I also understand that is why The BRITISH WORLD got > > together, and > > THUMPED him :-) > > > > Pierre What's-his-face finessed Canada into the Metric system > > during his > > Hay-day !!!! > > > > I hope that they are using IMPERIAL MEASURE in his corner of > > Eternity !!!!!! > > > > Comprennez-vous ? > > > > Paul Robins > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CAN-ONT-SIMCOE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Merry Christmas Jane I found this site which may be of interest to you. It is an "English-to-American" dictionary and explains. You'll find your bob in there. http://english2american.com/dictionary/b.html Happy Christmas to all, Doreen ========= > From: jwatt@ica.net > To: can-ont-simcoe@rootsweb.com > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:00:14 -0500 > Subject: Re: [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE] [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE Money > > Seeing as you are so familiar with the old system of money in GB, can you > tell me what a "bob" was, my grandmother used that currency from 1900-1920 > before she emigrated to Canada. > Jane in Cooksville (Mississauga) Ontario, Canada > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Malcolm Moody > To: > Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 12:30 PM > Subject: Re: [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE] Measures & chains & acres,lumbermen and > farmers > > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Since we seem to be in "silly season": I suspect that Napoleon had >> as much to do with the inauguration of the metric system as King >> Henry 8(?) had to do with the length of the standard Imperial yard. >> It just happened on his "watch." I will, however, stand up for the >> metric system (even though I am and old ****, and was bought up on >> the silly, and completely arbitrary, Imperial system of measurement. >> >> The exact measurement of each of the metric standards is now based >> on some quite esoteric physical constant but they also approximate to >> (and were originally derived from) a straightforward piece of >> physical mensuration available to all. The meter, for instance, is >> now based on the wavelength of a particular color of light, but in >> practical terms 100 km equates to about one degree of arc (4 minutes >> of rotation at the equator) at the earth's surface. The kilogram is >> defined by a lump of some rare metal but it is very close to the >> weight (actually mass, but lets not get into that) of a liter of pure >> water. These two units, together with the second as a length of >> time, are enough to derive all the other units of measurement we >> need. (Fortunately the second was defined by the astronomers way >> back and is related to the speed of rotation of the Earth so we don't >> have to deal with Imperial and Metric seconds!) Using multiples of >> ten means that we can define larger and smaller metric units by >> simply moving the decimal point, without the need to remember 1760 >> yards in a mile or 16 ounces in a pound, unless its' liquid when it's >> 20 ounces, except if you live in the US that is when its ...... and >> so on and so forth. >> >> When people in Canada decry the metric system i wonder how they >> would have got on with Imperial currency if it hadn't been phased out >> in the early 1800's. How about 240 cents to the dollar? How about >> 12 cents to the dime? And a halfcrown instead of a quarter? (NB: >> There was NO "crown"!) Still sound OK? Try working out an 8% and a >> 6% tax in your head using 240 cent dollars. >> >> My only problem with the metric system is that I was bought up on >> the Imperial system and when I look at a length it comes into my mind >> in feet and inches, not in meters and centimeters - or I think it's >> going to weigh so many pounds (not stones thank goodness) rather than >> kilos - so I'm constantly doing mental arithmetic to convert into the >> metric system to know how much I need, or how far I have to go. >> >> No, lets keep furlongs, poles, peks, barrels and stones and >> hundredweights (112 lb. - of course!) in the history books where they >> belong! >> >> And a Merry Christmas (Ooops! Sorry!) Happy Holiday to you all. :-) >> >> Malcolm >> >> Archive CD Books Canada Inc. >> President: Malcolm Moody >> PO Box 11 >> Manotick >> Ontario, K4M 1A2 >> Canada. >> (613) 692-2667 >> WEB SITE: http://www.ArchiveCDBooks.ca >> >> On 23 Dec, 2007, at 3:02 AM, can-ont-simcoe-request@rootsweb.com wrote: >> >>> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:55:56 -0500 >>> From: "Paul and Ruth Robins" >>> Subject: Re: [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE] Measures & chains & acres, lumbermen and >>> farmers >>> To: >>> Message-ID: >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >>> >>> It was always my understanding, that it was NAPOLEON who >>> commissioned the >>> study which eventually became the metric standard. The metre became >>> 1 / >>> what-ever of the distance between the Equator, and the North Pole. >>> >>> I also understand that is why The BRITISH WORLD got >>> together, and >>> THUMPED him :-) >>> >>> Pierre What's-his-face finessed Canada into the Metric system >>> during his >>> Hay-day !!!! >>> >>> I hope that they are using IMPERIAL MEASURE in his corner of >>> Eternity !!!!!! >>> >>> Comprennez-vous ? >>> >>> Paul Robins >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > CAN-ONT-SIMCOE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CAN-ONT-SIMCOE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Read what Santa`s been up to! For all the latest, visit asksantaclaus.spaces.live.com! http://asksantaclaus.spaces.live.com/

Thanks very much Doreen, what a fun site! Merry Christmas and a Happy and Healthy New Year to you all. Jane in Cooksville (Mississauga) Ontario, Canada ----- Original Message ----- From: Conlin <conlin2004@hotmail.com> To: <can-ont-simcoe@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 1:22 PM Subject: Re: [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE] [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE Money > > > Merry Christmas Jane > > I found this site which may be of interest to you. It is an "English-to-American" dictionary and explains. You'll find your bob in there. > > http://english2american.com/dictionary/b.html > > > Happy Christmas to all, > > Doreen

Jane . EVERYTHING ( NOW) IS FROM MEMORY . I MAY STAND TO BE CORRECTED. Believe the " Bob " was a slang term for a Pound. In which case 5 bob was roughly equally to 20 Bucks .. in the " Good Old Days " . Or am I confusing this with ' QUID ' ??? I STILL THINK IN IMPERIAL MEASURE . and as Malcolm, I do quick conversions. For pure " Hellery ", when I am asked , usually at the Hospital, how much I weigh, I tell them 15 STONE . My only problem is that metric, in most cases, is TOO FINE, but with temperature, it is not fine enough. Anybody have any idea just how much 40 centimetres of snow really is ??? And when the WEATHER CHANNEL SAYS THAT TOMORROW'S TEMPERATURE WILL BE 6.7 DEGREES CELSIUS .. DO I NEED A SCARF AND GLOVES, OR NOT !!! INCIDENTALLY, Malcolm, is the QUEEN'S PLATE, at Woodbine, still not run for 50 Guineas ? Keep it up, Good Folks, this is the Best Fun that I have had in quite a while !!!!! Paul Robins -----Original Message----- From: can-ont-simcoe-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:can-ont-simcoe-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Jane Watt Sent: December-23-07 1:00 PM To: can-ont-simcoe@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE] [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE Money Seeing as you are so familiar with the old system of money in GB, can you tell me what a "bob" was, my grandmother used that currency from 1900-1920 before she emigrated to Canada. Jane in Cooksville (Mississauga) Ontario, Canada ----- Original Message ----- From: Malcolm Moody <malcolm@archivecdbooks.ca> To: <can-ont-simcoe@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE] Measures & chains & acres,lumbermen and farmers > Hi Paul, > > Since we seem to be in "silly season": I suspect that Napoleon had > as much to do with the inauguration of the metric system as King > Henry 8(?) had to do with the length of the standard Imperial yard. > It just happened on his "watch." I will, however, stand up for the > metric system (even though I am and old ****, and was bought up on > the silly, and completely arbitrary, Imperial system of measurement. > > The exact measurement of each of the metric standards is now based > on some quite esoteric physical constant but they also approximate to > (and were originally derived from) a straightforward piece of > physical mensuration available to all. The meter, for instance, is > now based on the wavelength of a particular color of light, but in > practical terms 100 km equates to about one degree of arc (4 minutes > of rotation at the equator) at the earth's surface. The kilogram is > defined by a lump of some rare metal but it is very close to the > weight (actually mass, but lets not get into that) of a liter of pure > water. These two units, together with the second as a length of > time, are enough to derive all the other units of measurement we > need. (Fortunately the second was defined by the astronomers way > back and is related to the speed of rotation of the Earth so we don't > have to deal with Imperial and Metric seconds!) Using multiples of > ten means that we can define larger and smaller metric units by > simply moving the decimal point, without the need to remember 1760 > yards in a mile or 16 ounces in a pound, unless its' liquid when it's > 20 ounces, except if you live in the US that is when its ...... and > so on and so forth. > > When people in Canada decry the metric system i wonder how they > would have got on with Imperial currency if it hadn't been phased out > in the early 1800's. How about 240 cents to the dollar? How about > 12 cents to the dime? And a halfcrown instead of a quarter? (NB: > There was NO "crown"!) Still sound OK? Try working out an 8% and a > 6% tax in your head using 240 cent dollars. > > My only problem with the metric system is that I was bought up on > the Imperial system and when I look at a length it comes into my mind > in feet and inches, not in meters and centimeters - or I think it's > going to weigh so many pounds (not stones thank goodness) rather than > kilos - so I'm constantly doing mental arithmetic to convert into the > metric system to know how much I need, or how far I have to go. > > No, lets keep furlongs, poles, peks, barrels and stones and > hundredweights (112 lb. - of course!) in the history books where they > belong! > > And a Merry Christmas (Ooops! Sorry!) Happy Holiday to you all. :-) > > Malcolm > > Archive CD Books Canada Inc. > President: Malcolm Moody > PO Box 11 > Manotick > Ontario, K4M 1A2 > Canada. > (613) 692-2667 > WEB SITE: http://www.ArchiveCDBooks.ca > > On 23 Dec, 2007, at 3:02 AM, can-ont-simcoe-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:55:56 -0500 > > From: "Paul and Ruth Robins" <robins0379@rogers.com> > > Subject: Re: [CAN-ONT-SIMCOE] Measures & chains & acres, lumbermen and > > farmers > > To: <can-ont-simcoe@rootsweb.com> > > Message-ID: <200712221756.lBMHu0aA028749@mail.rootsweb.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > It was always my understanding, that it was NAPOLEON who > > commissioned the > > study which eventually became the metric standard. The metre became > > 1 / > > what-ever of the distance between the Equator, and the North Pole. > > > > I also understand that is why The BRITISH WORLD got > > together, and > > THUMPED him :-) > > > > Pierre What's-his-face finessed Canada into the Metric system > > during his > > Hay-day !!!! > > > > I hope that they are using IMPERIAL MEASURE in his corner of > > Eternity !!!!!! > > > > Comprennez-vous ? > > > > Paul Robins > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CAN-ONT-SIMCOE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CAN-ONT-SIMCOE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message