Hi Larry Awhile back there was a discussion about posting newer marriages to the list. Where as unscrupulous character might try obtaining all parties information and try obtaining fradulant credit cards, etc. Please see the following posts..Also my reasons why not to post information which falls in line with the 99 year rule. I'm just trying to protect the rights of living relatives. CAN-ONT-GREY-L Archives From: Shelley Hilton <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Grey Co.] Marriages - County of Grey, Division of Osprey, from 1899-1900 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 17:40:28 -0700 References: <<[email protected]>> <<[email protected]>> Hi Ann, Yes, I've heard about these sort of things, but that sort of information is EASILY available in many sorts of places. I would suspect that Mastercard would be checking for more background information (ie. credit history) of a person than their parents' or grandparents' names. I'm sure that someone applying for their first credit card 100 years after their parents were married would certainly be suspect! I don't see the harm in posting these marriages, but if others object, I will not post any more. Shelley ----- Original Message ----- From: "mcintosh" <[email protected]> To: "Shelley Hilton" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Re: [Grey Co.] Marriages - County of Grey, Division of Osprey, from 1899-1900 > Hi Shelley > I just noticed you had posted 1899-1900, I had a letter sent to me last week > with regards to people taking info of older people off sites and using them > as their parents applying for a master card, charging and then making a mad > dash and never paying, Have you heard anything about this thought I would > ask. > Ann > Subject: 99 year rule re marriages etc. Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:25:39 -0600 From: Ida & Merle King <[email protected]> To: Grey Co Ont <[email protected]> Hi All Thank you Shelley for sending along the marriages to the Grey Co. mailing list. I'm sure everyone is pleased that you are doing such a great service transcribing these items. A friend once sent me privately a transcription of a marriage with the following notation: >I originally hesitated to send this transcription along since it is well within the 99 year rule of privacy. Please use it accordingly. I'm sure if we follow the pattern of the census releases the transcriptions will be fine. later list mom Ida

that thought does not apply as it is easier to get info from graveyards than on posting obits. there is no birth dates or other info revelivent on obits to obtain documents. also the archives are posting info bmd's less than 99 years. searching: DODDS, MANN, LAWRENCE,HUGHES, WEST, CORBETT. [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ida & Merle King" <[email protected]> To: "Larry" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 9:55 AM Subject: Re: [Grey Co.] McLean/McInnis/McQuarrie 99 yr. rule > Hi Larry > > Awhile back there was a discussion about posting newer marriages to the > list. Where as unscrupulous character might try obtaining all parties > information and try obtaining fradulant credit cards, etc. Please see > the following posts..Also my reasons why not to post information which > falls in line with the 99 year rule. I'm just trying to protect the > rights of living relatives. > > CAN-ONT-GREY-L Archives > > From: Shelley Hilton <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Grey Co.] Marriages - County of Grey, Division > of Osprey, from 1899-1900 > Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 17:40:28 -0700 > References: <<[email protected]>> > <<[email protected]>> > > Hi Ann, > > Yes, I've heard about these sort of things, but that sort of > information is > EASILY available in many sorts of places. > > I would suspect that Mastercard would be checking for more > background > information (ie. credit history) of a person than their > parents' or > grandparents' names. I'm sure that someone applying for their > first credit > card 100 years after their parents were married would > certainly be suspect! > > I don't see the harm in posting these marriages, but if others > object, I > will not post any more. > > Shelley