I like the short version concept. What does it take to make the change? If a vote is required, you have mine. Gordon ----- Original Message ----- From: Maralyn A. Wellauer <fhea@execpc.com> To: <CAN-MB-WINNIPEG-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 16, 1999 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [CAN-MB-WINNIPEG-L] Re: CAN-MB-WINNIPEG-D Digest V99 #50 > CA-MB-WPG would seem to be descriptive, if agreeable. > > Maralyn > -----Original Message----- > From: Susan Edwards <susanedw@uoguelph.ca> > To: CAN-MB-WINNIPEG-L@rootsweb.com <CAN-MB-WINNIPEG-L@rootsweb.com> > Date: Saturday, October 16, 1999 3:25 PM > Subject: [CAN-MB-WINNIPEG-L] Re: CAN-MB-WINNIPEG-D Digest V99 #50 > > > >Is there any way we can eliminate the CAN-MB-WINNIPEG at the beginning of > >the subject lines? This seems to take up almost all of the line and forces > >one to look at every listing in the Digest. > > > >Just a thought. > > > >Susan > > > > > >==== CAN-MB-WINNIPEG Mailing List ==== > >Visit the Manitoba GenWeb Project > >http://www.rootsweb.com/~canmb/ > > > > > ==== CAN-MB-WINNIPEG Mailing List ==== > Canada GenWeb Archives Project > http://www.rootsweb.com/~canwgw/cgwarchives.html > Primary Records for Canada > >