Larry...you are aware that there are several markers...4 I think....that are known to mutate rapidly, even from father to son. I would check out which marker differs and see if it falls in that listing. If that is the only difference, might be an explanation. Joan

Joan, Thanks for pointing that out! It's number 460 and our value is 9. I am not that up on all the details but we were advised by the experts that this is among the hard to mutate markers. The group that are working on this are fifth cousins and our common ancestor was born in 1757. We have only found one other confirmed person that was not from that ancestor. There is another that I have not found time to work in but am looking forward to doing so this fall. Larry On 6/27/2010 9:18 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Larry...you are aware that there are several markers...4 I think....that > are known to mutate rapidly, even from father to son. I would check out which > marker differs and see if it falls in that listing. If that is the only > difference, might be an explanation. Joan > _______________________________________ > > Remember to search the archives use this address > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/?list=CAMPBELL > > Browse the archives at > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/CAMPBELL/ > > Contact the List Manager > mailto:[email protected] > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > __________ NOD32 5226 (20100624) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > > > >