Do we not have a database with rootsweb? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ M F SMITH, 6 yr Army Vet, Ret, AL, APS Genealogy.......... "http://community.webtv.net/CmbtEngrVet/JUSTAVETERAN" and "http://community.webtv.net/DerDoodler/HARRYSGAHANNA" plus opinion line "http://community.webtv.net/Airacorba/VETERANSOPINION"

The idea for a collection of Calvert data sounds like a good one (although I favor the website with links to various branches). However, I have a question about documentation--is it your plan to use source citations for all these entries you're making or are you just entering names and dates without documentation? My guess is that you'd end up with a mess if you tried "passing around" the database for various folks to add to it. Why not just ask people to send their ged.coms to one central location to be merged with the main database? That way, each merged entry will be documented to the person who contributed the data. If you do decide to link to other sites, I hope you will include a link to my genealogy homepage for information about the line of Calverts I'm researching: http://www.familytreemaker.com/users/b/i/l/Carolyn-E-Billingsley/ Thanks, Carolyn

I mail my family tree that a great Aunt did on the Calverts but can remember who. I think it was someone on this list. I just have a webtv so I could snail mail my papers to who ever would like my information It goes back to 1255.

Hi George et al, I think your idea for a repository is a very good one but I also have to agree with the Robert's comments about not having one big database. As for the GenForum idea, I also disagree with that as an alternative as GenForum is likely to be eventually "harvested" by FTM and I don't particularly care for that idea! :) The idea behind the Calvert mailing list homepage was to be able to link to the various different lines of Calverts (and to all the data we can get out there on the web) of both those on and off list. Maybe we could come up with a "Beginning Generations" page that would then link off into the separate websites dealing with those lines. In other words, follow the tree down, say, 5 generations, to where most of us split off (at Leonard) and then have links to the pages dealing with each of the descending lines. For example, from Leonard's son William we would link to a page with William's genealogy and then links to pages with his children's information such as mine and Gary Lee's, who both descend from William (along with a lot of others on the list!)through different son's. This is easier to demonstrate than to explain! :) This way we all can keep track of our own "branches" but can collaborate on the first several generations before we "split". Another way to look at this is that we break into "taskforces" with each one taking on a certain "branch" and maintaining it. For example, I would take on the decendants of say, Richard, (John, Jacob, John, George, William, Leonard) unless there was no one on the father's line (ie. John) in which case I would take on John (Jacob,John,George,William,Leonard) unless there was no one... you get the idea. Then, where there was someone else on the line, we could collaborate on it and on up until we are all in the same "large" research group. Does this make any sense? That way we still have a "central repository" so to speak, but it is maintained by different folks in different places. If anything happens to one of the servers, etc., the rest of the database would still be intact. I would be more than happy to host it in the space we have on Rootsweb (as the space that I have is ad free and plenty big) but I really don't think having one large gedcom is a good idea (plus the fact that I HATE the ads and the layout of the new gedcom format at rootsweb). Ok, so that said, I'm updating the webpage as we speak and anyone out there that has a site that they would like linked... please speak up! Also, if you don't have a site but are interested in getting your data out there, please let me know and I'll see what we can work up to get you on the web! :) Christi Calvert Brogan Proud Rootsweb Donor Visit our list pages at http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~cbrogan Visit our personal homepage at http://users.idworld.net/brogan

Hi I am of the Calvert line and would be willing to help. Please let me know what to do. I am still tracing my line. But am willing to give what I have. Thanks this is great! I have been looking for something like this for a while. Debi C. Miller [email protected]

Nov. 10, 1999 Re Calvert info. At this point I feel I am so old I don't get the drift. My research has been my husband's line. It carries thru right to his father. There is more info. on the later family, who went to OH, in some Church of the Brethren books because there were several generations of ministers in the family. My own connection to the Calvert line is thru relatives such as Glasscock and Jackson, who have a connection to Foxworthy. I find Nicklin most useful re info. on the family. And someone mentioned the Howson family---that connects to Jones and John King has done a tremendous am't of work on this line. Lately, he has been out of contact. His e-mail address: b&[email protected] I am afraid that I really don't have a clear view on what form would be needed for the various lines. There are Calverts in KS who m. a sister of my aunt-in-law. Also a Calvert went to IN and m. my late father's 2c. So you can see what a problem I would have. I would be willing to help out, but I am not able to go into endless details and print-outs etc. Barbara M. Calvert

I thoroughly agree with the individual website & link idea put forth by Mr. Fillerup. That seems the best way to keep up to date information readily available. Also, a central database quickly becomes unwieldy and difficult to manage. Link, link, link, in my opinion. -----Original Message----- From: Robert Fillerup <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 11:33 AM Subject: Re: [CALVERT-L] Calvert Repository > I agree that there should be a "Repository." I disagree that any central file should be >created, and then added to, emailed around, circulated, or what not. I strongly disagree with the >concept that everybody could then contribute their "lines" to a database. We will simply end up >creating another monster like the LDS Ancestral File with a lot of jumbled and conflicting >information. > However, we already have such a central file. It's called the Internet. For example, for some >time I have been creating a web page for the William Calvert-Elizabeth Nodding line. Obviously, >the format is HTML. It contains all the known information about William and Elizabeth. It also >contains a link to my William -Elizabeth Nodding page for Elizabeth's parents. There are links to >other web sites for descendants who are maintaining a site for those offspring. [Now all I have >to do is polish it all off and put it out there!] > > All that is really needed is a volunteer to host a page for a particular ancestor. Link all >of the ancestor pages together at one place and you have exactly what you desire, a giant >repository of Calvert information. > >To repeat: > As soon as there is a central page, it will contain a link to my William Calvert-Elizabeth >Nodding page. All those who descend from William and Elizabeth who are willing, will help me >maintain that page, some by providing their own pages on their particular lines. That way, no one >person has to do a lot of work. In addition, the info can always be as up-to-date as the person >maintaining the page wants it to be. > > A further problem with a central data base is that there are always conflicts in >information. Where I manage the "home page" for a particular individual, I can note the >differences of dates, conflicts, questions, etc, and if somebody disputes what's there, they can >email me with their thoughts, evidence, etc. which I can then add in. > > What I am proposing is essentially identical to the USGenWeb project. Instead of States and >Counties, we'll have Calverts and sub-Calverts, so to speak. There will be an official web page >for each individual Calvert line, with additional pages for further descendants, as the need and >interest arises. > > There are a lot of families on the Net who have organized this way. Let's take advantage of >the tool we already have in place. Please don't attempt to create another central data base! The >LDS Church can't make theirs work. The only way one will work is if there is a single individual >who is willing to devote almost full time to trying to determine which information is the most >accurate on a particular individual. I can guarantee you that the information I would submit to >such a database on the William-Elizabeth line will conflict with what's in O'Gorman, what's in >the LDS Ancestral File, and with what a lot of people already have in their own data bases. >Don't try the "central repository" approach. It simply won't work! > > >==== CALVERT Mailing List ==== >All messages posted to this mailing list are the property of their writers. Please obtain permission from all parties before forwarding or publishing any message from this list. > >

Screening the "input" of files may sound good, but those doing the screening will show their type lineage, and if someone else has a different view, it would be omitted. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ M F SMITH, 6 yr Army Vet, Ret, AL, APS Genealogy.......... "http://community.webtv.net/CmbtEngrVet/JUSTAVETERAN" and "http://community.webtv.net/DerDoodler/HARRYSGAHANNA" plus opinion line "http://community.webtv.net/Airacorba/VETERANSOPINION"

Each proposal that we have heard thus far sounds good and timely. Mike has a good point about a central repository for the various lines of Calverts in one central place. I, also, understand those who are worried about the problems of a central repository.and keeping it updated. And, what do we do when the name changes from Calvert to Jones for example? The proposal of separate home pages for each line might be an answer, but if something happens to the owner, the server, or the provider, the information can be lost. Rootsweb seems to provide an answer. Most of the genealogy societies will continue to support the project in the future, thereby preserving the information. A committee could be established to screen information coming into the list or a specific site. The drawbacks to this proposal are many, but they are not insurmountable. Genforum, as much as I use it, has become an adjunct to Family Tree Maker. I doubt that Broderbund would hesitate to transform the information to their use in some way. (This brings up a cautionary idea that was previously obliquely expressed about copyright infringement. Those who have used the work of others would have to obtain permission from the owners of the copyright to publish on the web.) The transmission of files can be accomplished through GEDCOM files which all of us should be able to download. That would not limit the participants to one particular software. These are not proposals, just thoughts out for others to consider, Oh, another thing, the numbering system should in some way conform to prior research and certainly to a system approved by the Genealogical Societies.. Jim

The idea for a Calvert repository is a good one, but let's be sure known errors do not get posted to it--and O'Gorman's book does contain some erroneous information.

I agree that there should be a "Repository." I disagree that any central file should be created, and then added to, emailed around, circulated, or what not. I strongly disagree with the concept that everybody could then contribute their "lines" to a database. We will simply end up creating another monster like the LDS Ancestral File with a lot of jumbled and conflicting information. However, we already have such a central file. It's called the Internet. For example, for some time I have been creating a web page for the William Calvert-Elizabeth Nodding line. Obviously, the format is HTML. It contains all the known information about William and Elizabeth. It also contains a link to my William -Elizabeth Nodding page for Elizabeth's parents. There are links to other web sites for descendants who are maintaining a site for those offspring. [Now all I have to do is polish it all off and put it out there!] All that is really needed is a volunteer to host a page for a particular ancestor. Link all of the ancestor pages together at one place and you have exactly what you desire, a giant repository of Calvert information. To repeat: As soon as there is a central page, it will contain a link to my William Calvert-Elizabeth Nodding page. All those who descend from William and Elizabeth who are willing, will help me maintain that page, some by providing their own pages on their particular lines. That way, no one person has to do a lot of work. In addition, the info can always be as up-to-date as the person maintaining the page wants it to be. A further problem with a central data base is that there are always conflicts in information. Where I manage the "home page" for a particular individual, I can note the differences of dates, conflicts, questions, etc, and if somebody disputes what's there, they can email me with their thoughts, evidence, etc. which I can then add in. What I am proposing is essentially identical to the USGenWeb project. Instead of States and Counties, we'll have Calverts and sub-Calverts, so to speak. There will be an official web page for each individual Calvert line, with additional pages for further descendants, as the need and interest arises. There are a lot of families on the Net who have organized this way. Let's take advantage of the tool we already have in place. Please don't attempt to create another central data base! The LDS Church can't make theirs work. The only way one will work is if there is a single individual who is willing to devote almost full time to trying to determine which information is the most accurate on a particular individual. I can guarantee you that the information I would submit to such a database on the William-Elizabeth line will conflict with what's in O'Gorman, what's in the LDS Ancestral File, and with what a lot of people already have in their own data bases. Don't try the "central repository" approach. It simply won't work!

Your proposal sounds really great. However, not all of us use FTM. I, for example, use TMG. I have not only my own research, but I willing to enter in the book, "The CALVERT Family, Cortland County Branch" John Betts CALVERT and its continuation by Charles Crossman CALVERT. To send that to your repository, I need to obtain permission from Rev. Robert Harvey CALVERT, Charles Crossman CALVERT's son. I feel he would extend that permission as little is known about our branch of the CALVERT family other than what we have collectively researched out and those publications. It will take me some time before this can be accomplished, and I do not want to infringe upon the numbering system you are proposing. However, as we are not part and parcel of the O'Gorman researched CALVERT's nor the Quaker branch, nor the Anita Calvert BOURGOISE group, nor the NICKLIN group, we do not fit neatly into the tree. Nevertheless, it is an important branch of the CALVERTs and there are a lot of descendants, I am certain, that are as yet unknown to us. I know for a fact, that many of my nearer line moved to Kansas after the Civil war and that there were other CALVERTs there, who may or may not be relatives. Please keep us posted as to the structure and means for this deposition. It is an answer to a concern that I have had for some time. I have plans to deposit my research in the various counties where our CALVERTs migrated to after the initial migration from Ireland. I would like to see the information posted or reposited in such a way that it cannot be lifted wholesale and claimed by someone else. I have had that happen already and it is mighty uncomfortable. I am a willing sharer of my work, but unwilling to place it where copyright would be denied for the research I have done. After all is said and done, I have put forth considerable effort and moneys to get it to the point that I have it thus far, and as long as I live, I expect to take my research forward. Thus, I would wish to reserve the right to make additions and corrections where I find new information. Anyway, keep up the good work. Charlene Calvert Pinkowski [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 1:19 AM Subject: CALVERT-D Digest V99 #185

The following website accepts queries and various data and it is already set to receive various and sundry information on the Calvert surname. <A HREF="http://genforum.genealogy.com/cgi-genforum/finder.cgi?find=Calvert"> Calvert Family Genealogy Forum</A> There are many individual websites dedicated to individual strains of the Calvert family. Dewel D. Lott of Hartselle, AL has published three volumes about the particular family from whom I descend. He has spent many years and untold amounts of money doing this research and making it available to descendants at minimal cost. His work is documented.

I think it's a wonderful idea however I would love to find out more about the Howson line as that is my line. Sarah Howson Calvert, daughter of Charles Calvert and Mary Howson married Nathaniel Jones, according to O'Gorman. Anyone know anything about Howson??? Debi ----- Original Message ----- From: GL Murphy <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 8:18 AM Subject: [CALVERT-L] Calvert Repository ok now i understand what you want to do....I am a Virginia Calvert...but not connected to Lord Baltimore Calvert....according to O'Gorman.....so how would my line be handled?? tho it is in the O'Gorman book.....(my line that is) tho i would rather see a book out rather than it be in any of the pay for things...with a book we can donate them to the local libraries and plus pass on our copies to our kids....and it doenst have to cost any more than if we were to print the pages....we dont have to make a profit out of it that is.....I have the FTM program and have not submitted my line on purpose...i would rather offer it for free rather than have ppl pay for it..... > Subject: [CALVERT-L] Calvert Repository > Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 00:36:18 -500 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > Dear Fellow Calverts, > > I am suggesting a massive project of assembling and publishing information about > the Calvert family. The primary reason for doing this would be to help others find their > Calvert ancestors. Beyond helping others, we would also establish a permanent and > growing library or repository where information about the family would be catalogued. > Later, when our children and grandchildren became interested in family history, they > have a starting point to learn about great-grandfather, etc. (Anybody who thinks what > we are doing now is going to be passed-on to future generations, should stop and > think about where they began their research.) > > The concept would be for each of us to "collectively place" our family lines in > "Ultimate Family Tree". This would be done by sharing a "common file" and E-mailing > the file from person to person. My proposal would be to start with the Virginia > Calverts. The Virginia Calverts alone would create an "Ultimate Family Tree". with > more than 8061 records. After this, we could add in the Quaker Calverts, etc. > > To make this work, we would have to be very "fussy" about record numbers. For > example with the Virginia Calverts, we would be using the numbers assigned in > Descendants of Virginia Calverts. This would take us to at least 8061 records. When > we added in the Quaker Calverts, we would need to move to perhaps a 10,000 series > of record numbers. For loose branches of the family tree, we would need to list > "unknown individuals" to carry these lines back to their roots in the 16th century. > (This is all workable, however we can't have someone saying "Aunt Mytle" is record > no. 1 and she is going to take the place of the 1st Lord Baltimore.) > > The job won't be that difficult, if there are enough volunteers willing to "add" their own > family lines to the FTM program. Once this was up and going, we simply ask the > newcomers to add-in their newly discovered family lines. Also, the "old-timers" would > have a place for adding newly > discovered info about their families. > > For my part in doing this, I will add the complete text from > Descendants of Virginia Calverts, for the 1st Lord Balitimore and his > son Leonard, plus all the Calverts thru the 6th generation in > Descendants of Virginia Calverts. From this point on, we need > volunteers. Please share your thoughts about doing this, and let me > know if you are willing to help. > > George Calvert > [email protected] -- HUGS..... Ginger ICQ #1487139 http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/Shores/6969 http://nisland.signwave.com telnet://nisland.signwave.com:6969 http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Resort/1577 ==== CALVERT Mailing List ==== Any list problems or questions can be sent to the listowner, Christi Calvert Brogan at [email protected]

ok now i understand what you want to do....I am a Virginia Calvert...but not connected to Lord Baltimore Calvert....according to O'Gorman.....so how would my line be handled?? tho it is in the O'Gorman book.....(my line that is) tho i would rather see a book out rather than it be in any of the pay for things...with a book we can donate them to the local libraries and plus pass on our copies to our kids....and it doenst have to cost any more than if we were to print the pages....we dont have to make a profit out of it that is.....I have the FTM program and have not submitted my line on purpose...i would rather offer it for free rather than have ppl pay for it..... > Subject: [CALVERT-L] Calvert Repository > Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 00:36:18 -500 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > Dear Fellow Calverts, > > I am suggesting a massive project of assembling and publishing information about > the Calvert family. The primary reason for doing this would be to help others find their > Calvert ancestors. Beyond helping others, we would also establish a permanent and > growing library or repository where information about the family would be catalogued. > Later, when our children and grandchildren became interested in family history, they > have a starting point to learn about great-grandfather, etc. (Anybody who thinks what > we are doing now is going to be passed-on to future generations, should stop and > think about where they began their research.) > > The concept would be for each of us to “collectively place” our family lines in > “Ultimate Family Tree”. This would be done by sharing a “common file” and E-mailing > the file from person to person. My proposal would be to start with the Virginia > Calverts. The Virginia Calverts alone would create an “Ultimate Family Tree”. with > more than 8061 records. After this, we could add in the Quaker Calverts, etc. > > To make this work, we would have to be very “fussy” about record numbers. For > example with the Virginia Calverts, we would be using the numbers assigned in > Descendants of Virginia Calverts. This would take us to at least 8061 records. When > we added in the Quaker Calverts, we would need to move to perhaps a 10,000 series > of record numbers. For loose branches of the family tree, we would need to list > “unknown individuals” to carry these lines back to their roots in the 16th century. > (This is all workable, however we can't have someone saying "Aunt Mytle" is record > no. 1 and she is going to take the place of the 1st Lord Baltimore.) > > The job won't be that difficult, if there are enough volunteers willing to “add” their own > family lines to the FTM program. Once this was up and going, we simply ask the > newcomers to add-in their newly discovered family lines. Also, the “old-timers” would > have a place for adding newly > discovered info about their families. > > For my part in doing this, I will add the complete text from > Descendants of Virginia Calverts, for the 1st Lord Balitimore and his > son Leonard, plus all the Calverts thru the 6th generation in > Descendants of Virginia Calverts. From this point on, we need > volunteers. Please share your thoughts about doing this, and let me > know if you are willing to help. > > George Calvert > [email protected] -- HUGS..... Ginger ICQ #1487139 http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/Shores/6969 http://nisland.signwave.com telnet://nisland.signwave.com:6969 http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Resort/1577

Can anyone help this gentleman out? I don't have an answer for him but figured someone on the list might. He's not a subscriber, so please send email directly to him at [email protected] and cc the list. Thanks so much! Christi Calvert Brogan Proud Rootsweb Donor Visit our list pages at http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~cbrogan Visit our personal homepage at http://users.idworld.net/brogan -----Original Message----- From: Terry Stevens [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 1999 3:23 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Adam Spence Terry Stevens [email protected] Dear Christi According to the Register of marylands heraldic families P. 338 Adam spence of snow hill,md was granted a manorial grant from the Calvert family for having maternal lineage to the Calvert family. I was wondering if you could tell me how he was related to the calverts? This is a mystery I would love to have solved. Thank you very much Terry

Hello all! I want to thank each and every one of you for subscribing to this Rootsweb genealogy list. If you are receiving this message, you have somehow gotten yourself subscribed to one of the mailing lists at Rootsweb.com. These are surname specific lists meant for sharing information and queries between people on various genealogical searches. If you wish to unsubscribe, or have somehow gotten yourself signed up by accident, you can do so by sending email to "listname"[email protected] or "listname"[email protected] with the message body UNSUBSCRIBE For the listname you are subscribed to, please see the "to" address of this email. It is time now for a brief word from our sponsor :) List guidelines: All Rootsweb lists cannot accept HTML or Rich Text (RTF) formatted email or attachments, please make sure all email is in plain text format before sending to the list. Please feel free to visit the surname resource pages at Rootsweb as well as our personal mailing list pages by going to http://www.rootsweb.com and clicking on Surname Resources for the Rootsweb page and to the Mailing list jump page at http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~cbrogan and selecting the list name for our personal mailing list pages. If you wish to respond to the entire list, you will need to replace the personal name in the to field with the list address, otherwise your response will only go to the person who sent the original message. If you have a problem with another list member, please do not post to the list but rather send email to the listowner and we will handle it off list. DO NOT forward Chain letters, off-topic posts, or virus alerts to the list. There are two sites listed below that deal with these hoaxes. Please check one of them and then email the listowner if you are still concerned. If there is cause for real alarm, he/she will address the list. http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/hoax.html http://www.cheyenne.com/virusinfo/ DO NOT forward other people's mail, email or copyrighted information to the list at any time without specific permission of the author (and clearance from the listowner) This prevents "information stealing" and hurt feelings on the list. DO NOT attempt to sell, advertise or distribute products to the list members without prior authorization from the listowner. Doing so is cause for immediate removal from the list. If you have a genealogy book you have written that you wish to let people know about, please alert the listowner for further instructions. If you would like to read through the archives of this or any other list, please visit: http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl You can reach the surname resources for this and other Rootsweb lists by going to http://resources.rootsweb.com/surnames/ and choosing your specific surname. You can reach the GenConnect Web boards for this and other Rootsweb lists by going to http://cgi.rootsweb.com/~genbbs/indx/FamAssoc.html OK... that's enough of the tough stuff. If anyone has issues with the above rules, please feel free to contact me via email and we can discuss it. If there are large "uprisings" about some of the rules, we will vote on action on the list, but it must first be discussed with the listowner off-list. While we're on the subject of sponsors though, if any of you would like to join in the support of our great host, Rootsweb, please become a sponsor or member by visiting: http://www.rootsweb.com/rootsweb/members/ Again, thanks to all for making these lists what they are today! Now, back to GENEALOGY!!! Christi Calvert Brogan Proud Rootsweb Donor Visit our list pages at http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~cbrogan Visit our personal homepage at http://users.idworld.net/brogan

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01BF21A4.8274A960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I just saw this book posted for bid at ebay. I don't have the funds to bid on this book, but thought someone in the group might be interested. No photo... just the description below. URL http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=190037085 Calvert County Maryland Wills-Genealogy Book "Calvert County,Maryland,WILLS(1954-1700) by Raymond B. Clark and Sara Seth Clark;Published by the Author's in 1974. This is a OUT-OF-PRINT,FIRST EDITION,OVERSIZED STIFF PAPERWRAPS EDITION in NEAR FINE CONDITION,consisting of 99 pages with 278 Wills and a complete Index to Names Mentioned along with Places.This is a Original Publication by these Authors and fills a void created by a number of Court House Fires that destroyed much of this Southern Maryland County's Records.This is a NO RESERVE AUCTION on this Genealogy-Related Book and THIS BOOK IS NO LONGER OBTAINABLE.The Winning Bidder pays 3.20 Priority Shipping in the U.S.GOOD LUCK!!! Cheers Gary Lee Calvert mailto:[email protected] ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01BF21A4.8274A960 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; name="Gary Lee Calvert.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Gary Lee Calvert.vcf" BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Calvert;Gary;Lee FN:Gary Lee Calvert ORG:WB9SMX TEL;WORK;VOICE:765-452-1314 TEL;HOME;VOICE:765-452-1314 ADR;WORK:;;P.O. Box 6353;Kokomo;Indiana;46904-6353;U.S.A. LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=3DQUOTED-PRINTABLE:P.O. Box 6353=3D0D=3D0AKokomo, = Indiana 46904-6353=3D0D=3D0AU.S.A. ADR;HOME:;;2900 North Apperson #86;Kokomo;Indiana;46901;U.S.A. LABEL;HOME;ENCODING=3DQUOTED-PRINTABLE:2900 North Apperson = #86=3D0D=3D0AKokomo, Indiana 46901=3D0D=3D0AU.S.A. X-WAB-GENDER:2 URL:http://members.iquest.net/~gcalvert/home.html URL:http://members.iquest.net/~gcalvert/me.html BDAY:19991107 EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[email protected] EMAIL;INTERNET:[email protected] REV:19991029T052823Z END:VCARD ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01BF21A4.8274A960--

Oct. 26, 1999 Re Calvert/Nodding Some one has done a batch of research on that line. It is pretty much covered in the 2nd section of O'Gorman. It seems to me that someone came up with a good connection to the Calverts desc. from Leonard and Wm. O'Gorman says the tie is not there, but that was in the 1940's. I think someone on this list has found a connection, but I don't know who. Barbara M. Calvert

Just an FYI to all who may be trying to use the GenConnect boards today. This message was received concerning them: The server that houses GenConnect will be down today (Tuesday, Oct 26, 1999) until about 9 pm PST (midnight east coast). It's being moved to a new location. Once it's back up, it may have a new DNS, so if it appears to still be down for you, please allow some time for the DNS to filter its way through the 'Net. If you or your visitors have trouble bringing GenConnect up after tonight, try the following (these are all DNS-caching related): Dump your browser's cache. Empty your 'history' folder. Shut down your browser and restart it. If that still doesn't work, try rebooting your computer. Some browsers cache DNS's. Best of luck, The GenConnect Team After tonight, if you have problems, please let me know and I'll see what we can do. Still working on the new webpages, so be prepared! :) Christi Calvert Brogan Proud Rootsweb Donor Visit our list pages at http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~cbrogan Visit our personal homepage at http://users.idworld.net/brogan