LaMona, I have James D Cagle, (you show James A., b. Aug 1855) b. 18 Oct 1854, son of David S Cagle above, married Eunice J Little, b. 21 Sep 1860 (you show 1861). You show two daughters Ida and Malina born 1872 and 1879 respectively. If the DOB of 1861 is correct, she would have been 11 yrs of age at the birth of Ida Cagle. The book by Charles O Cagle indicates Eunice's maiden name was Austin. Could it be that Eunice was previously married. She was 26 years of age at the birth of her first Cagle child. I believe these two daughters were the children of a previous marriage to an Unknown Little and her maiden name was Austin as shown by Charles O Cagle's book. The problem is her date of birth which is also, listed as 21 Sep 1860 in Charles O Cagle's book. Maybe, these children were her step children resulting from the death of her previous husband. It would not be the first time a step mother raised her step children following the death of her husband. Of course, this is pure speculation. However, I don't believe Eunice was giving birth at 11 yrs of age. What do you think. Lee Cagle Okla City ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!